VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Mercedes T Class comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 131 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 23,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Mercedes T Class?

Mazda CX-80 vs Mercedes T Class: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • visibly more efficient
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Mercedes T Class

4 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • markedly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mercedes T Class is significantly cheaper – starting at 23,000 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 26,361 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Mercedes T Class with 5.1 L/100km. The difference is about 1.1 L/100km.

T Class

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers clearly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 131 HP. That’s roughly 196 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Mercedes T Class takes 11.6 s. That’s about 4.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 280 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mercedes T Class is markedly lighter – 1,556 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 575 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries marginally more – 650 kg compared to 630 kg. That’s a difference of about 20 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-80 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,300
CX-80

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range 60 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mercedes T Class
VW Caddy
VS
In the increasingly competitive segment of versatile vans, the Mercedes T-Klasse stands out with its premium feel and luxurious interior, positioning it as a strong contender against the VW Caddy. While the Caddy offers practicality and functionality with its robust design and efficient engine …
Mazda CX-80
Mercedes T Class

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Mercedes T Class

The Mercedes T-Class dresses everyday practicality in a premium suit, blending the sensible utility of a small van with the refinement you expect from the three-pointed star. Its flexible interior and clever details make it a brilliantly pragmatic choice for families and active owners who want comfort and usefulness without the fuss.

details
22C0257_016
22C0257_018
22C0258_003
22C0258_007
22C0257_013

Reviews Mercedes T Class

4 (1 Reviews)
rate
Derek Woolfson
20 May 2026, 17:10:55

Better all around

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Mazda CX-80
MG MGS9
VS
Mazda CX-80 and MG MGS9 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-80 or the MG MGS9 is …
Mercedes Citan
Mercedes T Class
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact vans, the Mercedes Citan and the Mercedes T-Klasse each bring their own distinct appeal. While the Citan excels with its agility and urban maneuverability, the T-Klasse stands out with its spacious interior and enhanced comfort features, catering to families …
Lexus RX
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the battle of luxury and practicality, the Lexus RX and Mazda CX-80 present distinct offerings that cater to different driver preferences. The RX impresses with its refined interior and advanced technology, delivering a smooth ride that epitomizes luxury. Meanwhile, the CX-80 combines stylish …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Mercedes T Class
Peugeot Rifter
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Mercedes T-Class and Peugeot Rifter, discerning motorists will find intriguing differences. The T-Class delights with a luxury appeal typical of the Mercedes brand, boasting cutting-edge technology and premium interior finishes that elevate everyday utility. …
Mazda CX-30
Mazda CX-80
VS
Mazda CX-30 and Mazda CX-80 go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Mazda CX-30 or the Mazda …
Mazda CX-80
Mercedes T Class

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
23,000 - 30,500 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 7.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
135 - 167 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
High Roof Estate
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
1,556 - 1,678 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,859 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
521 - 630 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
95 - 131 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.6 - 15.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
200 - 270 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, D, E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.