VS

Mazda CX-80 vs MINI Aceman comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 27,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or MINI Aceman?

Mazda CX-80 vs MINI Aceman: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly more power
details

MINI Aceman

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • considerably more electric range
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly lighter
  • moderately more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

MINI Aceman is substantially cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 22,328 £.

As for electric range, the MINI Aceman offers considerably more range – reaching up to 355 km, about 295 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

Aceman

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers markedly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 69 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Aceman is marginally quicker – completing the sprint in 6.4 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 0.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers visibly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 350 Nm. That’s about 200 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, MINI Aceman is markedly lighter – 1,720 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 411 kg.

Looking at boot space, the MINI Aceman offers moderately more boot space – 300 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 42 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries a bit more – 650 kg compared to 530 kg. That’s a difference of about 120 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MINI Aceman holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,000
Aceman

MINI Aceman

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 184 - 258 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 309 - 355 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Mazda CX-80
MINI Aceman

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

MINI Aceman

The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.

details
P90545616_highRes_mini-aceman-se-04-20
P90545628_highRes_mini-aceman-se-04-20
P90547839_highRes_the-new-mini-aceman-

Reviews MINI Aceman

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
GEORGXRM
5 Jan 2026, 00:44:07

Amazing interior, sporty-funky exterior, great handles, good amount of power.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

MINI Aceman
MINI Countryman
VS
Comparing the MINI Aceman and the MINI Countryman helps you decide between a compact, city-focused crossover and a roomier, more practical small SUV. The Aceman prioritises agile handling, crisp urban packaging and striking style, while the Countryman brings more interior space, versatile cargo …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
MINI Aceman
Renault R5
VS
The MINI Aceman feels like a posh city rocket — cheeky handling, premium finishes and a slick interior make it the choice for drivers who want style and go‑kart fun wrapped in crossover practicality. The Renault 5, by contrast, pares back the flash for retro charm, more usable space and a …
Audi Q7
Mazda CX-80
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Audi Q7 and the Mazda CX-80 offer distinct experiences tailored for different types of drivers. The Audi Q7 exudes luxury with its high-end interior, advanced tech features, and robust performance, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a premium driving …
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-80
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-5 or the Mazda CX-80 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
MINI Aceman
smart #1
VS
The battle of the urbane compact SUVs heats up with the MINI Aceman and Smart #1 each vying for supremacy. The MINI Aceman delivers quintessential British charm, offering a lively driving experience and advanced tech wrapped in a stylish package. Meanwhile, the Smart #1 strikes back with its sleek, …
MINI Aceman
Volvo EX30
VS
In the highly anticipated showdown between the MINI Aceman and the Volvo EX30, both electric vehicles bring their unique flair to the compact SUV market. The MINI Aceman captivates with its playful design and nimble handling, embodying the brand's spirited character, while the Volvo EX30 impresses …
MINI Aceman
Tesla Model Y
VS
Unsure whether the MINI Aceman or the Tesla Model Y is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-80
MINI Aceman

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
27,000 - 36,400 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
300 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,754 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
450 - 530 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
MINI
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.