Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-80 vs MINI Countryman comparison
Compare performance (327 HP vs 313 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 30,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or MINI Countryman?
Mazda CX-80 vs MINI Countryman: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
CX-80
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
MINI Countryman is substantially cheaper – starting at 30,100 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 19,243 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the MINI Countryman with 5.9 L/100km. The difference is about 1.9 L/100km.
As for electric range, the MINI Countryman offers considerably more range – reaching up to 497 km, about 437 km more than the Mazda CX-80.
Countryman
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers very slightly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 313 HP. That’s roughly 14 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Countryman is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.6 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers slightly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 494 Nm. That’s about 56 Nm more.
CX-80
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, MINI Countryman is noticeably lighter – 1,570 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 561 kg.
Looking at boot space, the MINI Countryman offers considerably more boot space – 505 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 247 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries clearly more – 650 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 150 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The MINI Countryman is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £30,100
MINI Countryman
Mazda CX-80
MINI Countryman
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
MINI Countryman
The MINI Countryman turns the cheeky charm of a classic MINI into a proper all-rounder, blending playful styling with surprisingly usable space for everyday life. It still grins at city lights but will happily tackle muddy lanes, perfect for buyers who want character without sacrificing practicality.
details
Mazda CX-80
MINI Countryman
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
Price
30,100 - 39,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.9 - 6.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 15.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
Electric Range
463 - 497 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
co2
0 - 149 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
Curb weight
1,570 - 2,075 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
Trunk capacity
450 - 505 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,843 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Payload
475 - 500 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
122 - 313 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.6 - 10.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
230 - 494 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
90 - 230 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A, E
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
MINI
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.