@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ MINI / BMW Group Press
VS

Ford Puma vs MINI Countryman – Which model is better for everyday use?

Two cars, one duel: Ford Puma meets MINI Countryman.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Puma vs. MINI Countryman: A Tale of Two Stylish SUVs

In the bustling market of compact SUVs, the Ford Puma and MINI Countryman have managed to capture the spotlight with their distinctive styles and cutting-edge technology. Both models cater to the modern driver who demands a blend of practicality and charisma. Let’s dive into how these two vehicles stack up against each other in terms of design, performance, and innovation.

Countryman @ MINI / BMW Group Press

Design and Space

The Ford Puma boasts a sleek and sporty design with a touch of elegance, perfect for the urban landscape. Its compact dimensions, with a length ranging from 4186 to 4226 mm, provide excellent maneuverability, making it an ideal choice for city dwellers. Despite its compact size, the Puma offers a spacious interior with up to 523 liters of trunk space, accommodating the needs of an active lifestyle.

On the other hand, the MINI Countryman presents itself with a robust and adventurous aesthetic, slightly longer at around 4445 mm. The Countryman's interior is designed for comfort and versatility, with a trunk capacity ranging between 450 to 505 liters, depending on the model. Its larger profile suggests an SUV ready for both city streets and country roads.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Performance and Efficiency

When it comes to performance, the Ford Puma offers a range of petrol MHEV and electric options. Power output varies from 125 to 168 HP, and the model is known for its impressive fuel efficiency with petrol variants consuming between 5.4 to 6 L/100km. The electric variant of the Puma takes efficiency a step further, offering range figures between 364 to 376 km with a 43 kWh battery.

The MINI Countryman ups the ante with a broader engine selection, including petrol, diesel, and fully electric options. Its power output can soar up to 313 HP for the more athletic models. Fuel consumption for the petrol variants spans from 5.9 to 7.8 L/100km, while its electric version offers a more extended range of up to 462 km, supported by a 64.6 kWh battery.

Countryman @ MINI / BMW Group Press

Technology and Innovation

Both vehicles are equipped with state-of-the-art technology to enhance the driving experience. The Ford Puma integrates advanced safety features and convenience systems, including adaptive cruise control and a comprehensive digital cockpit for a futuristic driving feel.

Meanwhile, the MINI Countryman is no slouch, featuring a range of high-tech innovations such as a dual-clutch automatic transmission system and MINI’s own infotainment system, designed for both entertainment and functionality. The availability of all-wheel-drive in the Countryman also provides additional traction and stability, catering to those who venture off the beaten path.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Conclusion

Choosing between the Ford Puma and the MINI Countryman comes down to preference and lifestyle needs. The Ford Puma appeals to those seeking efficiency and a dynamic driving experience wrapped in a compact design. Meanwhile, the MINI Countryman offers a well-rounded package with more power and versatility for those who need a bit more room and off-road capability.

Both vehicles stand out with their unique attributes, securing their places in the fiercely competitive compact SUV segment. Ultimately, whether it's the stylish practicality of the Puma or the audacious charm of the Countryman, drivers are bound to find a model that resonates with their driving aspirations.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Countryman @ MINI / BMW Group Press

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Puma has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the MINI Countryman costs 31500 £. That’s a price difference of around 6771 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: MINI Countryman manages with 4.60 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.80 L per 100 km.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s a bit more efficient than the MINI Countryman with 15.70 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.60 kWh.

As for range, the MINI Countryman performs somewhat better – achieving up to 462 km, about 86 km more than the Ford Puma.

Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MINI Countryman has a convincingly edge – offering 313 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 145 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Countryman is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 2 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the MINI Countryman performs to a small extent better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: MINI Countryman pulls significantly stronger with 494 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 204 Nm difference.

Countryman @ MINI / BMW Group Press

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is evident lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1620 kg. The difference is around 304 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers barely noticeable more room – 523 L compared to 505 L. That’s a difference of about 18 L.

In maximum load capacity, the MINI Countryman performs slightly better – up to 1530 L, which is about 247 L more than the Ford Puma.

When it comes to payload, MINI Countryman minimal takes the win – 500 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 31 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the MINI Countryman shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £31,500
Countryman @ MINI / BMW Group Press

MINI Countryman

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Electric, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 163 - 313 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.6 - 7.8 L
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.7 - 16.8 kWh
  • Electric Range : 432 - 462 km
details

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

MINI Countryman

The MINI Countryman turns the cheeky charm of a classic MINI into a proper all-rounder, blending playful styling with surprisingly usable space for everyday life. It still grins at city lights but will happily tackle muddy lanes, perfect for buyers who want character without sacrificing practicality.

details
P90484775_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count @ MINI / BMW Group Press
P90484787_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count @ MINI / BMW Group Press
P90484779_highRes_mini-cooper-se-count @ MINI / BMW Group Press
P90454013_highRes_mini-cooper-s-countr @ MINI / BMW Group Press

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
MG MG4
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered compact crossover that feels taut and practical — with Ford's lively chassis, a roomy MegaBox boot and mild‑hybrid frugality — the Puma is the small SUV to live with. But if you're ready to go electric without blowing the budget, the MG4 serves up surprising …
Ford Puma
MINI Countryman
Puma @ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Countryman @ MINI / BMW Group Press

Costs and Consumption
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
31500 - 45300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7.8 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
15.7 - 16.8 kWh
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
432 - 462 km
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
64.60 kWh
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
0 - 177 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1620 - 2075 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
450 - 505 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4444 - 4447 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1843 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1635 - 1661 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1450 - 1530 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
460 - 500 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Electric, Petrol
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
163 - 313 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
170 - 250 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
250 - 494 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
120 - 230 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1499 - 1998 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A, G
Brand
Ford
Brand
MINI

Similar Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Renault Group Media
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Opel / Stellantis Media
Opel Frontera
VS
The Ford Puma feels like a sprightly urban fox — compact, efficient and packed with modern tech, perfect if you want lively handling and low running costs for daily driving. The Opel Frontera is all rugged charm and chunky presence, built for dirt tracks and weekend hauls rather than tight city …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Golf
VS
In the competitive arena of compact cars, the Ford Puma and VW Golf stand out for their exceptional blend of style and performance. The Puma impresses with its sporty design and agile handling, while the Golf continues to be a benchmark for interior quality and tech features. Ultimately, choosing …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Focus
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
BYD Dolphin Surf
VS
The Ford Puma and the BYD Dolphin went head-to-head in a thrilling comparison, showcasing unique strengths for diverse drivers. The Ford Puma offers a smooth blend of performance and style with its more traditional compact SUV design, appealing to those who value a sporty driving experience. …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Bayon
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover market, the Ford Puma and Hyundai Bayon both offer compelling choices for urban drivers. The Ford Puma is praised for its sporty handling and stylish design, making it a favorite for those who enjoy a dynamic driving experience. Meanwhile, the Hyundai Bayon …
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
@ Hyundai Motor Company
Hyundai Kona
VS
In this exciting comparison, the Ford Puma takes on the Hyundai Kona, two standout competitors in the crossover segment. The Puma impresses with its engaging driving dynamics and stylish design, while the Kona offers a more tech-savvy interior and a range of efficient powertrains. Ultimately, both …
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.