Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs MINI Countryman - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (168 HP vs 313 HP), boot space and price (24800 £ vs 31500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or MINI Countryman?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £ , while the MINI Countryman costs 31500 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6771 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: MINI Countryman manages with 4.60 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.80 L per 100 km.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s a bit more efficient than the MINI Countryman with 15.70 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.60 kWh.
As for electric range, the MINI Countryman performs somewhat better – achieving up to 462 km, about 86 km more than the Ford Puma.
Countryman
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the MINI Countryman has a convincingly edge – offering 313 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 145 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Countryman is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 5.40 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 2 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the MINI Countryman performs to a small extent better – reaching 250 km/h, while the Ford Puma tops out at 210 km/h. The difference is around 40 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: MINI Countryman pulls significantly stronger with 494 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 204 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is evident lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1620 kg. The difference is around 304 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers barely noticeable more room – 523 L compared to 505 L. That’s a difference of about 18 L.
In maximum load capacity, the MINI Countryman performs slightly better – up to 1530 L, which is about 247 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, MINI Countryman minimal takes the win – 500 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 31 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The MINI Countryman sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Ford Puma
MINI Countryman
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £31,500
MINI Countryman
Ford Puma
2 (7 Reviews)
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
MINI Countryman
The MINI Countryman turns the cheeky charm of a classic MINI into a proper all-rounder, blending playful styling with surprisingly usable space for everyday life. It still grins at city lights but will happily tackle muddy lanes, perfect for buyers who want character without sacrificing practicality.
details
Ford Puma
MINI Countryman
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
Price
31500 - 45300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.6 - 7.8 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.7 - 16.8 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
Electric Range
432 - 462 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
64.60 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 177 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
Curb weight
1620 - 2075 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
Trunk capacity
450 - 505 L
|
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
Length
4444 - 4447 mm
|
|
Width
1805 mm
|
Width
1843 mm
|
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
Height
1635 - 1661 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1450 - 1530 L
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
460 - 500 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Electric, Petrol
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
163 - 313 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
Max Speed
170 - 250 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
250 - 494 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
120 - 230 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1499 - 1998 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A, G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
MINI
|
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?
The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.