Compare performance (168 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 18,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or MG ZS?
In the booming compact SUV segment, the Ford Puma and MG ZS stand out as popular choices among drivers seeking style, convenience, and performance. This article delves into a detailed comparison of these two vehicles, evaluating their technical specifications, innovative features, and overall value for money.
The Ford Puma presents a sleek and modern silhouette, measuring between 4186 mm and 4226 mm in length, with a width of 1805 mm and a height of up to 1555 mm. Its dynamic design features a sporty front grille, LED headlights, and pronounced wheel arches, giving it an aggressive stance on the road.
On the other hand, the MG ZS offers a more robust appearance with dimensions ranging from 4323 mm to 4430 mm in length, a width of 1809 mm to 1818 mm, and a height of 1635 mm to 1649 mm. The ZS’s design incorporates sharp lines and a bold front fascia, making it a standout in urban environments.
The Ford Puma is available with a range of engine options, including petrol MHEV and electric variants. The petrol engines deliver impressive power outputs of up to 168 HP while maintaining a low fuel consumption of between 5.4 L/100km to 6 L/100km. The electric model offers a range of up to 376 km with a battery capacity of 43 kWh.
In comparison, the MG ZS is equipped with 1.5L petrol and electric full hybrid engines. The electric version achieves a top power of 197 HP with a fuel consumption as low as 5 L/100km and an electric range of up to 440 km using a 65.7 kWh battery. The ZS performs admirably with an acceleration of 0-100 km/h in just 8.6 seconds for its electric model.
Inside the Ford Puma, drivers will find a spacious cabin designed for comfort, boasting ample legroom and a trunk capacity ranging from 456 L to 523 L. The vehicle is well-equipped with the latest technology, including an intuitive infotainment system featuring a touchscreen display, smartphone integration, and advanced safety features such as adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assistance.
The MG ZS also offers a comfortable interior with a trunk capacity of 443 L to 448 L. It comes with a user-friendly infotainment system, including a digital display, smartphone connectivity, and various driver assistance features that enhance safety and convenience on the road. The modern finishes and spaciousness make it an appealing option for families.
The Ford Puma is praised for its dynamic driving characteristics, supported by its front-wheel-drive configuration and options for both manual and automatic transmissions. The nimble handling and responsive steering make it enjoyable to drive, especially through winding roads.
In contrast, the MG ZS offers a solid, comfortable ride with responsive handling. Its electric and hybrid models provide a quiet driving experience, with snappy acceleration and smooth power delivery thanks to the automatic transmission. The ZS is particularly well-suited for city driving, making it easy to navigate through congested streets.
When comparing the Ford Puma and MG ZS, both vehicles offer compelling features that cater to the needs of modern drivers. The Puma provides a sportier ride, cutting-edge technology, and a variety of engine options. Meanwhile, the ZS shines with its hybrid efficiency, generous electric range, and affordability.
Your choice will ultimately depend on your driving preferences and lifestyle needs. Whether you value performance and style in the Ford Puma or practicality and efficiency in the MG ZS, both SUVs deliver on their promise, making them worthy contenders in today’s competitive automotive landscape.
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
MG ZS is markedly cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,923 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG ZS uses 5.1 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS offers slightly more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 29 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.7 s. That’s about 1.3 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers clearly more torque with 290 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 142 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is marginally lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,330 kg. The difference is around 14 kg.
When it comes to payload, the MG ZS carries marginally more – 470 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 1 kg.
The Ford Puma comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
The MG ZS arrives as a cheeky and practical choice for shoppers who want SUV style and family-friendly space without blowing the budget. It may not pretend to be premium, but with sensible equipment, easy-to-live-with driving manners and surprising value, it makes a persuasive case for anyone after sensible transport with a bit of personality.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
115 - 145 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,818 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
375 - 470 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
MG
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España