Ford VS MG

VS

When comparing the Ford Puma and the MG ZS, it’s clear that both models appeal to different segments of the compact SUV market. The Ford Puma impresses with its sporty handling and innovative interior design, making it a favorite for those seeking a dynamic driving experience. Meanwhile, the MG ZS offers exceptional value for money, with a spacious cabin and robust features, appealing to budget-conscious buyers without sacrificing style.

Ford

details

MG

details

In the booming compact SUV segment, the Ford Puma and MG ZS stand out as popular choices among drivers seeking style, convenience, and performance. This article delves into a detailed comparison of these two vehicles, evaluating their technical specifications, innovative features, and overall value for money.

Design and Dimensions

The Ford Puma presents a sleek and modern silhouette, measuring between 4186 mm and 4226 mm in length, with a width of 1805 mm and a height of up to 1555 mm. Its dynamic design features a sporty front grille, LED headlights, and pronounced wheel arches, giving it an aggressive stance on the road.

On the other hand, the MG ZS offers a more robust appearance with dimensions ranging from 4323 mm to 4430 mm in length, a width of 1809 mm to 1818 mm, and a height of 1635 mm to 1649 mm. The ZS’s design incorporates sharp lines and a bold front fascia, making it a standout in urban environments.

Performance and Engine Specifications

The Ford Puma is available with a range of engine options, including petrol MHEV and electric variants. The petrol engines deliver impressive power outputs of up to 168 HP while maintaining a low fuel consumption of between 5.4 L/100km to 6 L/100km. The electric model offers a range of up to 376 km with a battery capacity of 43 kWh.

In comparison, the MG ZS is equipped with 1.5L petrol and electric full hybrid engines. The electric version achieves a top power of 197 HP with a fuel consumption as low as 5 L/100km and an electric range of up to 440 km using a 65.7 kWh battery. The ZS performs admirably with an acceleration of 0-100 km/h in just 8.6 seconds for its electric model.

Interior Comfort and Technology

Inside the Ford Puma, drivers will find a spacious cabin designed for comfort, boasting ample legroom and a trunk capacity ranging from 456 L to 523 L. The vehicle is well-equipped with the latest technology, including an intuitive infotainment system featuring a touchscreen display, smartphone integration, and advanced safety features such as adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assistance.

The MG ZS also offers a comfortable interior with a trunk capacity of 443 L to 448 L. It comes with a user-friendly infotainment system, including a digital display, smartphone connectivity, and various driver assistance features that enhance safety and convenience on the road. The modern finishes and spaciousness make it an appealing option for families.

Driving Experience and Handling

The Ford Puma is praised for its dynamic driving characteristics, supported by its front-wheel-drive configuration and options for both manual and automatic transmissions. The nimble handling and responsive steering make it enjoyable to drive, especially through winding roads.

In contrast, the MG ZS offers a solid, comfortable ride with responsive handling. Its electric and hybrid models provide a quiet driving experience, with snappy acceleration and smooth power delivery thanks to the automatic transmission. The ZS is particularly well-suited for city driving, making it easy to navigate through congested streets.

Conclusion: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

When comparing the Ford Puma and MG ZS, both vehicles offer compelling features that cater to the needs of modern drivers. The Puma provides a sportier ride, cutting-edge technology, and a variety of engine options. Meanwhile, the ZS shines with its hybrid efficiency, generous electric range, and affordability.

Your choice will ultimately depend on your driving preferences and lifestyle needs. Whether you value performance and style in the Ford Puma or practicality and efficiency in the MG ZS, both SUVs deliver on their promise, making them worthy contenders in today’s competitive automotive landscape.

Ford
MG

Costs and Consumption

Price
about 24800 - 34800 £
Price
about 18000 - 34300 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L
Consumption L/100km
5 - 6.5 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.7 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
17.3 - 17.8 kWh
Electric Range
364 - 376 km
Electric Range
320 - 440 km
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
49.3 - 65.7 kWh
co2
121, 129, 128, 136, 0 g/km
co2
0, 113, 115, 145 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
41 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1380 - 1620 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
443 - 448 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4323 - 4430 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1809 - 1818 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1635 - 1649 mm
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
450 - 490 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Electric, Full Hybrid, Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Schaltgetriebe
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.6 - 8.7 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
168 - 175 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
280 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1498 cm3
Top speed
160 - 210 km/h
Top speed
168 - 175 km/h

General

Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2021 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, E
Brand
Ford
Brand
MG

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.