When comparing the Ford Puma and the MG ZS, it’s clear that both models appeal to different segments of the compact SUV market. The Ford Puma impresses with its sporty handling and innovative interior design, making it a favorite for those seeking a dynamic driving experience. Meanwhile, the MG ZS offers exceptional value for money, with a spacious cabin and robust features, appealing to budget-conscious buyers without sacrificing style.
In the booming compact SUV segment, the Ford Puma and MG ZS stand out as popular choices among drivers seeking style, convenience, and performance. This article delves into a detailed comparison of these two vehicles, evaluating their technical specifications, innovative features, and overall value for money.
The Ford Puma presents a sleek and modern silhouette, measuring between 4186 mm and 4226 mm in length, with a width of 1805 mm and a height of up to 1555 mm. Its dynamic design features a sporty front grille, LED headlights, and pronounced wheel arches, giving it an aggressive stance on the road.
On the other hand, the MG ZS offers a more robust appearance with dimensions ranging from 4323 mm to 4430 mm in length, a width of 1809 mm to 1818 mm, and a height of 1635 mm to 1649 mm. The ZS’s design incorporates sharp lines and a bold front fascia, making it a standout in urban environments.
The Ford Puma is available with a range of engine options, including petrol MHEV and electric variants. The petrol engines deliver impressive power outputs of up to 168 HP while maintaining a low fuel consumption of between 5.4 L/100km to 6 L/100km. The electric model offers a range of up to 376 km with a battery capacity of 43 kWh.
In comparison, the MG ZS is equipped with 1.5L petrol and electric full hybrid engines. The electric version achieves a top power of 197 HP with a fuel consumption as low as 5 L/100km and an electric range of up to 440 km using a 65.7 kWh battery. The ZS performs admirably with an acceleration of 0-100 km/h in just 8.6 seconds for its electric model.
Inside the Ford Puma, drivers will find a spacious cabin designed for comfort, boasting ample legroom and a trunk capacity ranging from 456 L to 523 L. The vehicle is well-equipped with the latest technology, including an intuitive infotainment system featuring a touchscreen display, smartphone integration, and advanced safety features such as adaptive cruise control and lane-keeping assistance.
The MG ZS also offers a comfortable interior with a trunk capacity of 443 L to 448 L. It comes with a user-friendly infotainment system, including a digital display, smartphone connectivity, and various driver assistance features that enhance safety and convenience on the road. The modern finishes and spaciousness make it an appealing option for families.
The Ford Puma is praised for its dynamic driving characteristics, supported by its front-wheel-drive configuration and options for both manual and automatic transmissions. The nimble handling and responsive steering make it enjoyable to drive, especially through winding roads.
In contrast, the MG ZS offers a solid, comfortable ride with responsive handling. Its electric and hybrid models provide a quiet driving experience, with snappy acceleration and smooth power delivery thanks to the automatic transmission. The ZS is particularly well-suited for city driving, making it easy to navigate through congested streets.
When comparing the Ford Puma and MG ZS, both vehicles offer compelling features that cater to the needs of modern drivers. The Puma provides a sportier ride, cutting-edge technology, and a variety of engine options. Meanwhile, the ZS shines with its hybrid efficiency, generous electric range, and affordability.
Your choice will ultimately depend on your driving preferences and lifestyle needs. Whether you value performance and style in the Ford Puma or practicality and efficiency in the MG ZS, both SUVs deliver on their promise, making them worthy contenders in today’s competitive automotive landscape.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 24800 - 34800
£
|
Price
about 18000 - 34300
£
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6
L
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 6.5
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.7
kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.3 - 17.8
kWh
|
Electric Range
364 - 376
km
|
Electric Range
320 - 440
km
|
Battery Capacity
43
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
49.3 - 65.7
kWh
|
co2
121, 129, 128, 136, 0
g/km
|
co2
0, 113, 115, 145
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
42
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
41
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563
kg
|
Curb weight
1380 - 1620
kg
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523
L
|
Trunk capacity
443 - 448
L
|
Length
4186 - 4226
mm
|
Length
4323 - 4430
mm
|
Width
1805
mm
|
Width
1809 - 1818
mm
|
Height
1550 - 1555
mm
|
Height
1635 - 1649
mm
|
Payload
367 - 469
kg
|
Payload
450 - 490
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Full Hybrid, Petrol
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Schaltgetriebe
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
125 - 168
HP
|
Power HP
116 - 197
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.6 - 8.7
s
|
Max Speed
160 - 210
km/h
|
Max Speed
168 - 175
km/h
|
Torque
170 - 290
Nm
|
Torque
280
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Power kW
92 - 124
kW
|
Power kW
85 - 145
kW
|
Engine capacity
999
cm3
|
Engine capacity
1498
cm3
|
Top speed
160 - 210
km/h
|
Top speed
168 - 175
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2021 - 2025
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, C, E
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
MG
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.