VS

Ford Puma vs MG ZS comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 18,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or MG ZS?

Ford Puma vs MG ZS: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • markedly cheaper
  • slightly more power
  • marginally more efficient
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Puma

Ford Puma vs MG ZS — quick editorial snapshot

Ford Puma vs MG ZS pits a playful, tech-forward compact crossover against a value-focused, roomy hybrid SUV. The Ford Puma leans into driving enjoyment and clever everyday practicality with its washable MegaBox and updated SYNC system, while the MG ZS trades a bit of polish for a lower price, generous rear space and a full-hybrid drivetrain that feels electric in town. Buyers will notice the Puma’s sharper steering and more engaging character immediately, whereas the MG ZS makes its case with family-friendly room, standard assist systems and a reassuring seven-year warranty. That sets the scene: one car chases driving feel and refined tech, the other chases space, cost-effectiveness and hybrid efficiency.

ZS

Character and on-road behaviour

The Ford Puma is the more expressive car on twisty B-roads — direct steering, tight body control and a generally sporty temperament give it a small-car fun factor that’s rare in this segment. The MG ZS takes the conservative route: its hybrid system makes urban starts smooth and effortless, but the steering and suspension prioritise safety and serenity over engagement, so it never feels lively. In town the ZS’s hybrid torque masks transmission fuss, whereas the Puma’s three-cylinder sometimes feels buzzy at low revs and the dual-clutch can be hesitant in stop‑and‑go traffic. Choose the Puma if you want to enjoy driving, and the MG ZS if you prefer calm, predictable progress and electric‑like urban sprints.

Puma

Comfort and long-distance usability

On long trips the Ford Puma generally settles into a composed, motorway-friendly rhythm with good front-seat support and useful driver aids that reduce fatigue on long stretches. The MG ZS, despite roomy seats and easy ingress for rear passengers, reveals its compromises on the motorway: louder wind and tyre noise and a firmer ride make long hours less relaxing than you might hope. Rear occupants are more comfortable in the MG ZS thanks to noticeably more leg- and headroom, while the Puma’s back seat feels tight for taller adults on extended journeys. If you prioritise front-seat comfort and a composed highway demeanour, the Puma nudges ahead; for rear-seat passengers and everyday family hauling, the ZS is the kinder option.

ZS

Practicality and everyday usability

The Ford Puma stands out for smart load-lugging — its MegaBox and a wide, practical boot opening make awkward items easy to stow and clean, which pays off for active lifestyles. The MG ZS counters with overall larger rear accommodation and a genuinely usable cargo bay that swallows family kit without fuss, and its higher seating position makes loading and access easier for children and older passengers. Inside, both cars push touchscreen-led controls, but the Puma’s newer infotainment and wireless phone mirroring feel more modern; the ZS’s system works but leans on wired connections and simpler ergonomics. In short: Puma wins clever luggage tricks and modern connectivity, MG ZS wins outright space and everyday family practicality.

Puma

Cabin feel, materials and technology

Step into the Ford Puma and you’ll notice a more contemporary cockpit design with bigger screens and a generally fresher impression, even if some panels still use hard plastics — the overall feel aims upscale relative to price. The MG ZS makes its value obvious: durable surfaces and sensible layout, but many plastics and trims lack finesse and the result feels functional rather than premium. Technology is a clear divider: the Puma’s updated SYNC offering and wireless smartphone integration feel smoother day-to-day, whereas the MG ZS bundles generous driver assistance and a long warranty that reduces ownership anxiety despite the simpler interface. If perceived quality and gadget polish matter, the Puma is preferable; if equipment level and ownership reassurance are priorities, the ZS scores more points.

ZS

Buyer fit — who should pick which car

Choose the Ford Puma if you’re a driver who values engagement, contemporary in-car tech and clever cargo solutions, and you’re willing to pay a bit more for a sharper feel and a more modern cabin. Opt for the MG ZS if your priorities are rear-seat space, the lowest purchase outlay for a hybrid setup, strong standard safety tech and a long warranty that lowers running‑worry — it’s the pragmatic family and budget-conscious pick. Both cars make sensible compromises, so the decision largely comes down to whether you want a playful, tech-forward crossover (Puma) or a roomy, cost-effective hybrid that prioritises space and ownership peace of mind (MG ZS). The next technical comparison will spell out the specific equipment, packaging and drivetrain trade-offs behind those everyday impressions.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

MG ZS is markedly cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,923 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG ZS uses 5.1 L/100km and is marginally more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.3 L/100km.

ZS

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS offers slightly more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 29 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.7 s. That’s about 1.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers clearly more torque with 290 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 142 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is marginally lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,330 kg. The difference is around 14 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers somewhat more boot space – 523 L compared to 443 L. That’s a difference of about 80 L.

When it comes to payload, the MG ZS carries marginally more – 470 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 1 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma comes out clearly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 404 - 417 km
details
Ford Puma
MG ZS

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

MG ZS

The MG ZS is a compact crossover that delivers strong value with a roomy cabin and straightforward tech, making it a sensible choice for budget-minded buyers. It’s easy to live with, offering comfortable rides and a practical layout that suits daily commutes and family errands.

details
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-07
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-21
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-luxury_interior
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-16

Reviews MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
Constantin
9 Jun 2026, 22:34:01

I replaced my Dacia Jogger with an MG ZS Hybrid and I don't regret it.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ahmed
30 Sept 2025, 14:05:11

With all the features it offers at that price, the MG has no competition. A BMW X1 of similar dimensions with a few extra upgrades costs more than twice as much, and considering that 40% of MG’s spare parts come from Germany (Bosch, Continental, etc.), I’d go for the MG ZS Hybrid without a second thought.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Ford Puma
Kia EV2
VS
The Ford Puma and Kia EV2 represent two different approaches in the compact crossover class: the Puma delivers engaging handling, practical packaging and petrol/hybrid options, while the EV2 is a clean-sheet electric aimed at low running costs, range and modern tech. Choose the Puma if driving …
Ford Puma
Opel Frontera
VS
The Ford Puma feels like a sprightly urban fox — compact, efficient and packed with modern tech, perfect if you want lively handling and low running costs for daily driving. The Opel Frontera is all rugged charm and chunky presence, built for dirt tracks and weekend hauls rather than tight city …
MG ZS
Nissan Juke
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Nissan Juke pits a practical, value-oriented small SUV (the MG ZS) against a more stylised, compact crossover with sharper driving character (the Nissan Juke). This quick guide highlights how they differ in space, equipment, engines and running costs so you can pick the …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
MG MG3
MG ZS
VS
Choosing between the compact MG3 hatchback and the larger MG ZS crossover comes down to whether you prioritise city-friendly agility and low running costs or interior space and practicality. This comparison covers driving character, equipment, fuel economy and ownership costs to help you pick the …
Ford Puma
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Ford Puma and Toyota C-HR are rival compact crossovers that blend city-friendly footprints with SUV styling—one leaning towards playful driving dynamics and clever practicality, the other toward bold design and hybrid efficiency. This comparison will help you choose between the Puma’s engaging …
Ford Puma
VW Taigo
VS
The Ford Puma and Volkswagen Taigo are compact crossover SUVs that bring raised ride height and SUV styling to the city-friendly hatchback segment. This comparison looks at driving feel, practicality, efficiency and equipment to help you decide which one better matches your priorities.
Ford Puma
MG ZS

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
115 - 145 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
443 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,818 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
375 - 470 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
148 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
Brand
Ford
Brand
MG
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.