@ Mazda Motor Corporation
VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Mitsubishi Outlander – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mazda CX-80 or Mitsubishi Outlander fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mitsubishi Outlander has a slightly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 42800 £, while the Mazda CX-80 costs 48200 £. That’s a price difference of around 5366 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mitsubishi Outlander manages with 0.80 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 1.60 L. The difference is about 0.80 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Mitsubishi Outlander performs distinct better – achieving up to 85 km, about 24 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 has a barely noticeable edge – offering 327 HP compared to 306 HP. That’s roughly 21 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 6.80 s, while the Mitsubishi Outlander takes 7.90 s. That’s about 1.10 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-80 performs evident better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Outlander tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 49 km/h.

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers evident more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Mitsubishi Outlander is minimal lighter – 2070 kg compared to 2131 kg. The difference is around 61 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mitsubishi Outlander offers decisively more room – 495 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 237 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mazda CX-80 performs distinct better – up to 1971 L, which is about 567 L more than the Mitsubishi Outlander.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 hardly perceptible takes the win – 650 kg compared to 595 kg. That’s a difference of about 55 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mitsubishi Outlander proves to be is largely superior and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mitsubishi Outlander is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £42,800
default

Mitsubishi Outlander

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 306 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.80 L
  • Electric Range : 83 - 85 km
details

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 exemplifies a perfect blend of sophisticated design and dynamic performance, making it a standout model in the SUV market. With its sleek lines and contemporary interior, it delivers a sense of luxury typically reserved for higher-end marques. This model also offers impressive handling and a comfortable ride, ensuring an enjoyable driving experience in various conditions.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10 @ Mazda Motor Corporation
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mitsubishi Outlander

5 (1)
rate

The Outlander continues to impress with its spacious interior and versatile seating options, making it a top choice for families on the go. With its sleek design and thoughtful features, this SUV effortlessly combines style and practicality, ensuring a comfortable ride for all passengers. Additionally, the Outlander's advanced safety technologies provide peace of mind, making it a reliable companion for both daily commutes and weekend adventures.

details

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC90
VS
In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC90, both vehicles offer a compelling blend of luxury and practicality. While the CX-80 impresses with its sporty handling and sleek design, the XC90 shines with its superior safety features and spacious interior. Ultimately, the choice may …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
In the latest face-off between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron, drivers will find compelling features that cater to different preferences. The CX-80 boasts a sleek design with a focus on driver engagement and a spacious interior, while the Tayron impresses with its technology and practicality. …
Mazda CX-80
Mitsubishi Outlander
CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Consumption
Price
48200 - 60200 £
Price
42800 - 51000 £
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 5.8 L
Consumption L/100km
0.80 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
61 km
Electric Range
83 - 85 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
35 - 151 g/km
co2
19 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
70 - 74 L
Fuel tank capacity
53 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
Curb weight
2070 - 2120 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
495 L
Length
4995 mm
Length
4719 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1862 mm
Height
1714 mm
Height
1746 - 1750 mm
Max trunk capacity
1971 L
Max trunk capacity
1404 L
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
545 - 595 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
-
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
-
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
306 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.90 s
Max Speed
195 - 219 km/h
Max Speed
170 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
225 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
2360 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Mitsubishi

Similar Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan X-Trail
Mitsubishi Outlander
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV market, the Nissan X-Trail and Mitsubishi Outlander stand out with their distinct features and capabilities. The X-Trail boasts a spacious interior and advanced safety technology, making it an excellent choice for families, while the Outlander impresses with its …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
Mitsubishi Outlander
VS
The Skoda Karoq and Mitsubishi Outlander compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mitsubishi Outlander
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
In the competitive landscape of modern SUVs, the Mitsubishi Outlander and Volkswagen Tayron stand out for their distinct offerings. The Mitsubishi Outlander impresses with its robust all-wheel-drive system and a comfortable, family-oriented interior, making it a versatile choice for both urban and …
Mitsubishi Outlander
Lynk & Co 08
VS
Unsure whether the Mitsubishi Outlander or the Lynk & Co 08 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
Mitsubishi Outlander
VS
The Ford Kuga and Mitsubishi Outlander both bring strong attributes to the compact SUV market, yet cater to slightly different audiences. The Kuga is praised for its sporty handling and modern, tech-rich interior, making it an appealing option for urban drivers who appreciate a sleek design. On the …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC60
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 and Volvo XC60 stand out with their distinct approaches to luxury and practicality. The CX-80 impresses with its engaging driving dynamics and stylish design, making it a favorite for those who prioritize performance and aesthetics. Meanwhile, …
@ Mazda Motor Corporation
Mazda CX-80
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Touareg
VS
In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Touareg, the Mazda shines with its sleek design and fuel-efficient performance that appeals to drivers seeking both aesthetics and economy. Conversely, the Touareg stands out by offering a luxurious interior and robust powertrain options that cater …
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.