VS

Mazda CX-80 vs NIO EL8 comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 653 HP), boot space and price (49300 £ vs 71100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or NIO EL8?

Mazda CX-80 vs NIO EL8: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

  • clearly cheaper
  • noticeable lighter

NIO EL8

  • convincingly more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • significantly quicker from 0–100 km/h
  • minimal more trunk space

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-80 has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 49300 £ , while the NIO EL8 costs 71100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21729 £.

As for electric range, the NIO EL8 performs clearly better – achieving up to 510 km, about 450 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

EL8

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the NIO EL8 has a convincingly edge – offering 653 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 326 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the NIO EL8 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.10 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.80 s. That’s about 2.70 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: NIO EL8 pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 850 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 300 Nm difference.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers somewhat more seating capacity – 7 vs 6.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is noticeable lighter – 2131 kg compared to 2613 kg. The difference is around 482 kg.

In terms of boot space, the NIO EL8 offers minimal more room – 265 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 7 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 slightly takes the win – 650 kg compared to 577 kg. That’s a difference of about 73 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The NIO EL8 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Mazda CX-80
NIO EL8

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis
from about £71,100
EL8

NIO EL8

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 653 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 21.2 - 22 kWh
  • Electric Range : 390 - 510 km

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details

NIO EL8

The NIO EL8 feels like a tech-savvy living room on wheels, blending upscale comfort with playful design for buyers who want electric refinement without the clinical vibe. It’s roomy, packed with clever features and a relaxed driving character that turns everyday trips into something a little more fun.

details
Mazda CX-80
NIO EL8

Costs and Consumption

Price
49300 - 61400 £
Price
71100 - 90800 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 22 kWh
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
390 - 510 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
73.5 - 90 kWh
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
6
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2131 - 2240 kg
Curb weight
2613 - 2633 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
265 L
Length
-
Length
5099 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1989 mm
Height
-
Height
1750 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
810 L
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
557 - 577 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
653 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.10 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
200 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
850 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
480 kW
Engine capacity
2488 - 3283 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
NIO
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.