VS

Mazda CX-80 vs NIO EL8 comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 653 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 71,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or NIO EL8?

Mazda CX-80 vs NIO EL8: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • markedly lighter
details

NIO EL8

  • clearly more power
  • considerably more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-80 is substantially cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the NIO EL8 costs 71,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,729 £.

As for electric range, the NIO EL8 offers considerably more range – reaching up to 510 km, about 450 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

EL8

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the NIO EL8 offers clearly more power – delivering 653 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 326 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the NIO EL8 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.1 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 2.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the NIO EL8 delivers noticeably more torque with 850 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 300 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 6.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is markedly lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,613 kg. The difference is around 482 kg.

Looking at boot space, the NIO EL8 offers only slightly more boot space – 265 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 7 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries moderately more – 650 kg compared to 577 kg. That’s a difference of about 73 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The NIO EL8 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £71,100
EL8

NIO EL8

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 653 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 21.2 - 22 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 390 - 510 km
Mazda CX-80
NIO EL8

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details

NIO EL8

The NIO EL8 feels like a tech-savvy living room on wheels, blending upscale comfort with playful design for buyers who want electric refinement without the clinical vibe. It’s roomy, packed with clever features and a relaxed driving character that turns everyday trips into something a little more fun.

details
Mazda CX-80
NIO EL8

Costs and Consumption

Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
71,100 - 90,800 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 22 kWh/100km
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
390 - 510 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
73.5 - 90 kWh
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
6
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
2,613 - 2,633 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
265 L
Length
-
Length
5,099 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,989 mm
Height
-
Height
1,750 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
810 L
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
557 - 577 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
653 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
200 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
850 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
480 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
NIO
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.