VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Nissan Ariya comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 435 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 54,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Nissan Ariya?

Mazda CX-80 vs Nissan Ariya: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • very slightly lighter
details

Nissan Ariya

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • substantially more electric range
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-80 is a bit cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Nissan Ariya costs 54,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,520 £.

As for electric range, the Nissan Ariya offers substantially more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 357 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

Ariya

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Ariya offers clearly more power – delivering 435 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 108 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Nissan Ariya is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 5 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 1.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Ariya delivers only slightly more torque with 600 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 50 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is very slightly lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,277 kg. The difference is around 146 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Nissan Ariya offers noticeably more boot space – 415 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 157 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries clearly more – 650 kg compared to 363 kg. That’s a difference of about 287 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Nissan Ariya holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

£54,848
Ariya

Nissan Ariya

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 435 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 24.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 417 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Explorer EV
Nissan Ariya
VS
Comparing the Ford Explorer EV and the Nissan Ariya, this short guide helps you decide which electric crossover fits your priorities: the Explorer EV emphasizes spacious, family-friendly utility while the Ariya focuses on sleek styling and tech-forward efficiency. We'll compare range, interior …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-80
Nissan Ariya

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Nissan Ariya

The Nissan Ariya wraps futuristic, sculpted styling around a calm, high-tech cabin, making the switch to electric feel surprisingly easy and grown-up. It’s a comfortable, sensible EV that favors everyday usability and clever packaging over headline-grabbing theatrics — ideal for buyers who want an elegant, low-fuss electric car without the ego.

details
Ariya_2022_Highlights_High_007
Ariya_2022_Highlights_High_001
Ariya_2022_Statics_High_050
Ariya_2022_Dynamics_High_040
Ariya_2022_Statics_High_055
Ariya_2022_Interiors_High_091
Ariya_2022_Interiors_High_073

Reviews Nissan Ariya

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Nissan Qashqai
Nissan Ariya
VS
Choosing between the Nissan Qashqai and the Nissan Ariya means deciding between a practical, conventionally powered compact SUV and a fully electric, more tech-focused crossover. This comparison highlights differences in driving feel, range and charging, interior space and equipment, and running …
Nissan Ariya
Omoda 5
VS
The Nissan Ariya and the Omoda 5 represent two different takes on the modern compact crossover — one from an established EV maker, the other a bold newcomer with value-packed features. This comparison focuses on range, technology, space and driving character so you can decide which fits your …
Mercedes EQA
Nissan Ariya
VS
Mercedes EQA and Nissan Ariya go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Lexus RZ
Nissan Ariya
VS
The Lexus RZ and Nissan Ariya compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Nissan Ariya
Skoda Elroq
VS
In the growing segment of electric SUVs, the Nissan Ariya and Skoda Elroq stand out for their unique design and innovative features. The Ariya impresses with its sleek silhouette and advanced technology, offering a spacious interior and a range of up to 300 miles. Conversely, the Elroq combines …
Audi Q7
Mazda CX-80
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Audi Q7 and the Mazda CX-80 offer distinct experiences tailored for different types of drivers. The Audi Q7 exudes luxury with its high-end interior, advanced tech features, and robust performance, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a premium driving …
CUPRA Tavascan
Nissan Ariya
VS
Unsure whether the CUPRA Tavascan or the Nissan Ariya is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-80
Nissan Ariya

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
54,800 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
24.5 kWh/100km
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
417 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
2,277 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
415 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,850 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
363 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
435 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
600 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
320 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Nissan
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.