Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda CX-80 vs Renault Captur comparison
Compare performance (327 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Renault Captur?
Mazda CX-80 vs Renault Captur: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
CX-80
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Renault Captur is substantially cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 27,943 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is slightly more efficient than the Renault Captur with 4.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.
Captur
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers clearly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 169 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Renault Captur takes 8.9 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mazda CX-80 delivers clearly more torque with 550 Nm compared to 265 Nm. That’s about 285 Nm more.
CX-80
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.
In terms of curb weight, Renault Captur is clearly lighter – 1,323 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 808 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Renault Captur offers clearly more boot space – 422 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 164 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries clearly more – 650 kg compared to 453 kg. That’s a difference of about 197 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mazda CX-80 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £49,300
Mazda CX-80
Mazda CX-80
Renault Captur
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda CX-80
The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
details
Renault Captur
The Renault Captur is a stylish and practical compact crossover that combines a high seating position and easy manoeuvrability with a comfortable, well‑equipped cabin. Its flexible interior layout and modern infotainment make it a sensible, polished choice for city drivers and small families.
details
Mazda CX-80
Renault Captur
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
Price
21,400 - 28,600 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
7
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
Curb weight
1,323 - 1,441 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
Width
1,797 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Payload
447 - 453 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Renault
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.