What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 reaches a peak output of 327 HP, depending on the model.

What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda CX-80 according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Mazda CX-80 consumes 1.60 L.

What is the Mazda CX-80’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 61 km.

How fast can the Mazda CX-80 go?

The Mazda CX-80 reaches up to 219 km/h.

How much luggage fits in the Mazda CX-80?

Depending on configuration, up to 258 L fit inside.

How big is the Mazda CX-80 overall?

Overall, the Mazda CX-80 is 4995 mm long, 1890 mm wide and 1714 mm high.

What drivetrain options does the Renault Espace have?

The Renault Espace is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Renault Espace?

Up to 200 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What are the consumption figures for the Renault Espace in liters per 100 km?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 4.90 L.

What is the Renault Espace’s trunk volume?

Depending on configuration, up to 692 L fit inside.

What are the dimensions of the Renault Espace?

Length 4746 mm, width 1830 mm, height 1645 mm – those are the dimensions of the Renault Espace.

Mazda CX-80 vs Renault Espace - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault Espace has a evident advantage in terms of price – it starts at 37500 £, while the Mazda CX-80 costs 48200 £. That’s a price difference of around 10672 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-80 manages with 1.60 L and is therefore decisively more efficient than the Renault Espace with 4.90 L. The difference is about 3.30 L per 100 km.

Espace @ Renault Group Media

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 has a noticeable edge – offering 327 HP compared to 200 HP. That’s roughly 127 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is noticeable quicker – completing the sprint in 6.80 s, while the Renault Espace takes 8.80 s. That’s about 2 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mazda CX-80 performs noticeable better – reaching 219 km/h, while the Renault Espace tops out at 174 km/h. The difference is around 45 km/h.

CX-80 @ Mazda Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: offers more seating capacity – vs .

In curb weight, Renault Espace is evident lighter – 1673 kg compared to 2131 kg. The difference is around 458 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Renault Espace offers decisively more room – 692 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 434 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Renault Espace performs slightly better – up to 2224 L, which is about 253 L more than the Mazda CX-80.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 a bit takes the win – 650 kg compared to 581 kg. That’s a difference of about 69 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mazda CX-80 shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

Reviews Mazda CX-80

Reviews Renault Espace

4.5 (2 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

In the showdown between the Mazda CX-80 and the Volvo XC90, both vehicles offer a compelling blend of luxury and practicality. While the CX-80 impresses with its sporty handling and sleek design, the XC90 shines with its superior safety features and spacious interior. Ultimately, the choice may …

@ Mazda Motor Corporation

Mazda CX-80

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kodiaq

VS

In the competitive SUV market, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a premium feel that often rivals higher-priced models. On the other hand, the Skoda Kodiaq impresses with its spacious interior and practical versatility, making it an excellent …

Costs and Consumption
Price 48200 - 60200 £	Price 37500 - 41400 £
Consumption L/100km 1.6 - 5.8 L	Consumption L/100km 4.90 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 61 km	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 35 - 151 g/km	co2 110 g/km
Fuel tank capacity 70 - 74 L	Fuel tank capacity 55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 7	Seats 5 - 7
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 2131 - 2240 kg	Curb weight 1673 - 1783 kg
Trunk capacity 258 L	Trunk capacity 212 - 692 L
Length 4995 mm	Length 4746 mm
Width 1890 mm	Width 1830 mm
Height 1714 mm	Height 1645 mm
Max trunk capacity 1971 L	Max trunk capacity 2054 - 2224 L
Payload 649 - 650 kg	Payload 404 - 581 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV	Engine Type Full Hybrid
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 254 - 327 HP	Power HP 200 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.8 - 8.4 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 8.80 s
Max Speed 195 - 219 km/h	Max Speed 174 km/h
Torque 500 - 550 Nm	Torque -
Number of Cylinders 4 - 6	Number of Cylinders 3
Power kW 187 - 241 kW	Power kW 147 kW
Engine capacity 2488 - 3283 cm3	Engine capacity 1199 cm3