VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Renault Espace comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 200 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 37,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Renault Espace?

Mazda CX-80 vs Renault Espace: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • markedly more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Renault Espace

4.1 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • markedly lighter
  • substantially more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault Espace is clearly cheaper – starting at 37,500 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,786 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mazda CX-80 uses 4 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Renault Espace with 4.9 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.

Espace

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers clearly more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 200 HP. That’s roughly 127 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.8 s, while the Renault Espace takes 8.8 s. That’s about 2 s quicker.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 7 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Espace is markedly lighter – 1,673 kg compared to 2,131 kg. The difference is around 458 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Renault Espace offers substantially more boot space – 692 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 434 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries somewhat more – 650 kg compared to 581 kg. That’s a difference of about 69 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda CX-80 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,300
CX-80

Mazda CX-80

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 254 - 327 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4 - 5.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 60 km
Mazda CX-80
Renault Espace

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details

Renault Espace

The Renault Espace is the sort of roomy, clever family cruiser that makes long journeys feel effortless, its interior prioritising comfort and practical thinking without drifting into blandness. It won't pretend to be a sports car, but its composed ride, smart packaging and a whisper of French flair make it a sensible and subtly stylish choice for buyers who value space and versatility.

details
Mazda CX-80
Renault Espace

Costs and Consumption

Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
37,500 - 41,400 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
110 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
55 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
1,673 - 1,783 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
212 - 692 L
Length
-
Length
4,746 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,830 mm
Height
-
Height
1,645 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
2,054 - 2,224 L
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
404 - 581 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
200 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
174 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
147 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
1,199 cm3

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Renault
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.