VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Volvo ES90 comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 61,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Volvo ES90?

Mazda CX-80 vs Volvo ES90: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

  • visibly cheaper
  • moderately lighter

Volvo ES90

3.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • substantially more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-80 is visibly cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Volvo ES90 costs 61,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,377 £.

As for electric range, the Volvo ES90 offers substantially more range – reaching up to 700 km, about 640 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

ES90

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo ES90 offers considerably more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 353 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo ES90 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 2.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo ES90 delivers clearly more torque with 870 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 320 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is moderately lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,410 kg. The difference is around 279 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Volvo ES90 offers noticeably more boot space – 424 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 166 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries visibly more – 650 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 150 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo ES90 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £61,700
ES90

Volvo ES90

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 333 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.9 - 17.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 651 - 700 km
Mazda CX-80
Volvo ES90

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details

Volvo ES90

The Volvo ES90 stands out as a luxury sedan, embodying Scandinavian elegance combined with innovative technology. Its sleek design is complemented by a plush interior that emphasizes comfort and safety, aligning with Volvo's renowned reputation. With advanced features and a focus on sustainability, the ES90 is a testament to the brand's commitment to responsible luxury.

details
Mazda CX-80
Volvo ES90

Costs and Consumption

Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
61,700 - 81,000 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.9 - 17.1 kWh/100km
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
651 - 700 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
88 - 102 kWh
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
2,410 - 2,610 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
424 L
Length
-
Length
5,000 mm
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,942 mm
Height
-
Height
1,546 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,427 L
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
490 - 500 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 6.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Volvo
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.