What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 reaches a peak output of 327 HP, depending on the model.

What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda CX-80 according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Mazda CX-80 consumes 4 L.

What is the Mazda CX-80’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 60 km.

How much luggage fits in the Mazda CX-80?

Depending on configuration, up to 258 L fit inside.

Is the Volvo ES90 offered with different drivetrains?

The Volvo ES90 is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Volvo ES90's engine?

Up to 680 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What is the Volvo ES90’s energy consumption?

Average electricity consumption is 15.90 kWh.

What is the electric driving range of the Volvo ES90?

The WLTP range is up to 700 km.

What is the battery capacity of the Volvo ES90?

The battery capacity is 102 kWh.

What maximum speed does the Volvo ES90 reach?

Depending on the model, top speed is 180 km/h.

How many liters of cargo space does the Volvo ES90 offer?

Depending on configuration, up to 424 L fit inside.

What are the dimensions of the Volvo ES90?

The Volvo ES90 measures 5000 mm long, 1942 mm wide and 1546 mm high.

Mazda CX-80 vs Volvo ES90 - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mazda CX-80 has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 49300 £, while the Volvo ES90 costs 61700 £. That’s a price difference of around 12377 £.

As for range, the Volvo ES90 performs significantly better – achieving up to 700 km, about 640 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

CX-80

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo ES90 has a decisively edge – offering 680 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 353 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo ES90 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.80 s. That’s about 2.80 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo ES90 pulls clearly perceptible stronger with 870 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 320 Nm difference.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is somewhat lighter – 2131 kg compared to 2410 kg. The difference is around 279 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo ES90 offers clearly perceptible more room – 424 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 166 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 distinct takes the win – 650 kg compared to 500 kg. That’s a difference of about 150 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Volvo ES90 proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Volvo ES90 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews Mazda CX-80

Reviews Volvo ES90

3.5 (2 Reviews)

Claire Shabukriela
2 Nov 2025, 13:00:19

I personally think this new model is the best for my family because it is super safe and sound.

Top Car Comparisons

Mazda CX-80

Toyota Highlander

VS

In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Mazda CX-80 stands out with its sleek design and engaging driving dynamics, offering a more premium feel than many of its rivals. Meanwhile, the Toyota Highlander impresses with its spacious interior and reputation for reliability, making it an attractive …

Mazda CX-80

VW Tayron

VS

In the latest face-off between the Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron, drivers will find compelling features that cater to different preferences. The CX-80 boasts a sleek design with a focus on driver engagement and a spacious interior, while the Tayron impresses with its technology and practicality. …

Costs and Consumption
Price 49300 - 61400 £	Price 61700 - 81000 £
Consumption L/100km 4 - 5.6 L	Consumption L/100km -
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km 15.9 - 17.1 kWh
Electric Range 60 km	Electric Range 651 - 700 km
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity 88 - 102 kWh
co2 91 - 146 g/km	co2 0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity -	Fuel tank capacity -

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type Hatchback
Seats 7	Seats 5
Doors -	Doors 5
Curb weight 2131 - 2240 kg	Curb weight 2410 - 2610 kg
Trunk capacity 258 L	Trunk capacity 424 L
Length -	Length 5000 mm
Width 1890 mm	Width 1942 mm
Height -	Height 1546 mm
Max trunk capacity -	Max trunk capacity 1427 L
Payload 649 - 650 kg	Payload 490 - 500 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV	Engine Type Electric
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP 254 - 327 HP	Power HP 333 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.8 - 8.4 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 4 - 6.6 s
Max Speed -	Max Speed 180 km/h
Torque 500 - 550 Nm	Torque 480 - 870 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4 - 6	Number of Cylinders -
Power kW 187 - 241 kW	Power kW 245 - 500 kW
Engine capacity 2488 - 3283 cm3	Engine capacity -