VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Volvo ES90 comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 69,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Volvo ES90?

Mazda CX-80 vs Volvo ES90: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • noticeably lighter
details

Volvo ES90

4.3 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • substantially more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-80 is clearly cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Volvo ES90 costs 69,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 20,606 £.

As for electric range, the Volvo ES90 offers substantially more range – reaching up to 706 km, about 646 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

ES90

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo ES90 offers considerably more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 353 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo ES90 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 2.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo ES90 delivers clearly more torque with 870 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 320 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is noticeably lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,610 kg. The difference is around 479 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries visibly more – 650 kg compared to 460 kg. That’s a difference of about 190 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo ES90 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £69,900
ES90

Volvo ES90

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 456 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 706 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Volvo ES90
Volvo EX60
VS
The Volvo EX90 and EX60 represent Volvo’s two-tier electric SUV lineup: the EX90 is the flagship focused on maximum space, safety and tech, while the EX60 is a smaller, more city-friendly alternative offering a sharper balance of efficiency and value. This comparison will focus on range, …
Volvo ES90
Polestar 5
VS
The Volvo EX90 and Polestar 5 go head-to-head as Scandinavian heavyweights: the EX90 pampers with safety, space and serene electric refinement, while the Polestar 5 trades plushness for sharper handling and a more driver-focused, performance-luxury feel. Choose the EX90 if you want a buttoned-up …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo ES90

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Volvo ES90

The Volvo ES90 stands out as a luxury sedan, embodying Scandinavian elegance combined with innovative technology. Its sleek design is complemented by a plush interior that emphasizes comfort and safety, aligning with Volvo's renowned reputation. With advanced features and a focus on sustainability, the ES90 is a testament to the brand's commitment to responsible luxury.

details
serpimg_28cCvx

Reviews Volvo ES90

4.3 (5 Reviews)
rate
Lars Erik
7 May 2026, 10:23:42

What a car. It's so easy to drive and so quiet. The interior is amazing, and if you ask me it's very beautiful.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Long-distance driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Peter
7 May 2026, 10:22:08

This is a great car with the best driving and the calmness and luxury you need.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Peter
27 Apr 2026, 05:22:37

This is the most silent and smooth riding car I have ever tried. It is super easy to use and very comfortable. Cooling and heating in all seats, air suspension and overall exceptional interior.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Claire Shabukriela
2 Nov 2025, 13:00:19

I personally think this new model is the best for my family because it is super safe and sound.

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Volvo EX90
Volvo ES90
VS
The Volvo EX90 and Volvo ES90 are Volvo's newest premium electric models, each showcasing the brand's focus on safety, luxury and advanced electrified powertrains. The EX90 is the flagship electric SUV while the ES90 delivers similar technology in a more traditional sedan/fastback form, so your …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Mercedes EQE
Volvo ES90
VS
The Mercedes EQE and Volvo ES90 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mazda CX-5
Mazda CX-80
VS
Unsure whether the Mazda CX-5 or the Mazda CX-80 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mercedes EQS
Volvo ES90
VS
Unsure whether the Mercedes EQS or the Volvo ES90 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-80
Peugeot 5008
VS
In the clash between the Mazda CX-80 and the Peugeot 5008, both SUVs deliver a commendable blend of style and functionality. The Mazda CX-80 impresses with its sleek aesthetics and a robust performance offering, suited for those who prioritize driving dynamics. Meanwhile, the Peugeot 5008 shines …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo ES90

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
69,900 - 74,600 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 kWh/100km
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
706 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
2,610 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,942 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
460 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
456 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 - 5.4 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
670 - 870 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
335 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Volvo
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.