VS

Mazda CX-80 vs Volvo EX90 comparison

Compare performance (327 HP vs 680 HP), boot space and price (49,300 £ vs 72,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-80 or Volvo EX90?

Mazda CX-80 vs Volvo EX90: Key differences

Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • slightly lighter
details

Volvo EX90

2.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • clearly more electric range
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-80 is substantially cheaper – starting at 49,300 £ , while the Volvo EX90 costs 72,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 22,834 £.

As for electric range, the Volvo EX90 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 620 km, about 560 km more than the Mazda CX-80.

EX90

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX90 offers substantially more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 327 HP. That’s roughly 353 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX90 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.2 s, while the Mazda CX-80 takes 6.8 s. That’s about 2.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX90 delivers markedly more torque with 870 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 320 Nm more.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 7 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-80 is slightly lighter – 2,131 kg compared to 2,555 kg. The difference is around 424 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mazda CX-80 carries only slightly more – 650 kg compared to 605 kg. That’s a difference of about 45 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX90 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £72,200
EX90

Volvo EX90

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 333 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 17.8 - 19.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 570 - 620 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX90
Volvo EX60
VS
Volvo's all-electric duo—the flagship EX90 and its sleeker, more compact EX60—go head-to-head in a battle of tech, space and real-world practicality. We'll cut through the Scandinavian serenity to tell you which suits a growing family, the eco-commuter, or your taste for tech and luxury (and which …
Volvo EX90
Volvo ES90
VS
The Volvo EX90 and Volvo ES90 are Volvo's newest premium electric models, each showcasing the brand's focus on safety, luxury and advanced electrified powertrains. The EX90 is the flagship electric SUV while the ES90 delivers similar technology in a more traditional sedan/fastback form, so your …
Mazda CX-80
Volvo EX90

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-80

The Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.

details
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-5
cx-80_meltingcopper_germany_act-10
cx-80_homura_germany_int-2

Reviews Mazda CX-80

3.1 (1 Reviews)
rate
Lrs
3 May 2026, 21:06:02

Good chunk of steel on steroids

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Volvo EX90

The Volvo EX90 feels like a Scandinavian fortress on wheels, combining serene luxury with smart safety features that make everyday driving remarkably calm and confident. It dresses cutting-edge electric technology in understated elegance, so buyers who want peace of mind without shouting about it will find it hard to resist.

details
305698_Volvo_EX90
305699_Volvo_EX90
305702_Volvo_EX90
305707_Volvo_EX90
305714_Volvo_EX90
305743_Volvo_EX90

Reviews Volvo EX90

2.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
CHD
22 Apr 2026, 11:15:18

Full of faults — at least every other day there's something that needs to be fixed. Consumption 24 kWh/100 km in summer; in winter the range is half of what was promised. The safety would be good if the promised features actually worked.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-80
Volvo XC90
VS
In the CX-80 vs XC90 duel, Mazda punches above its class with an elegant, driver-focused cabin and taut handling that makes this three-row SUV feel more like a sporty wagon, while Volvo’s XC90 leans into Scandinavian calm — airy space, top-tier safety kit and a plush ride. Choose the Mazda if you …
Mazda CX-80
VW Tayron
VS
The Mazda CX-80 and the VW Tayron are mid-size SUVs aimed at buyers who want roomy, family-capable vehicles with a balance of comfort and everyday usability. This comparison shows how the CX-80’s premium-feeling cabin and driver-focused dynamics stack up against the Tayron’s pragmatic space, …
Audi Q7
Mazda CX-80
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Audi Q7 and the Mazda CX-80 offer distinct experiences tailored for different types of drivers. The Audi Q7 exudes luxury with its high-end interior, advanced tech features, and robust performance, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a premium driving …
Mazda CX-60
Mazda CX-80
VS
The Mazda CX-60 and Mazda CX-80 are closely related SUVs that target different buyers: the CX-60 is a premium two-row midsize focused on driving dynamics and efficiency, while the CX-80 stretches that formula into a larger three-row package for families who need extra space. Choosing between them …
Audi Q6 e-tron
Volvo EX90
VS
In the battle of electric SUVs, the Audi Q6 e-tron stands out with its sleek design and advanced technology, offering a luxurious interior and a robust performance that Audi is known for. Meanwhile, the Volvo EX90 impresses with its commitment to safety and sustainability, combining innovative …
Mercedes EQS SUV
Volvo EX90
VS
In the realm of luxury electric SUVs, the Mercedes EQS SUV and the Volvo EX90 both emerge as formidable contenders, each with unique strengths. The Mercedes EQS SUV dazzles with its opulent interior and innovative MBUX Hyperscreen, offering unparalleled comfort and technological advancement for …
Kia Sorento
Mazda CX-80
VS
In the competitive midsize SUV segment, the Kia Sorento and Mazda CX-80 stand out with their unique blend of style, technology, and practicality. The Sorento impresses with its spacious interior and advanced driver-assistance features, making it a family-friendly choice, while the CX-80 captivates …
Volvo EX90
Porsche Cayenne
VS
Unsure whether the Volvo EX90 or the Porsche Cayenne is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-80
Volvo EX90

Costs and Consumption
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
Price
72,200 - 91,700 £
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
17.8 - 19.3 kWh/100km
Electric Range
60 km
Electric Range
570 - 620 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
91 - 146 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
6 - 7
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
Curb weight
2,555 - 2,765 kg
Trunk capacity
258 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,890 mm
Width
1,964 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
649 - 650 kg
Payload
545 - 605 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
Power HP
333 - 680 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.2 - 6.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
Torque
480 - 870 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
Power kW
245 - 500 kW
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Volvo
What drivetrain options does the Mazda CX-80 have?

The Mazda CX-80 is available as All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.