What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

What is the maximum horsepower of the Mazda CX-80?

The Mazda CX-80 reaches a peak output of 327 HP, depending on the model.

What is the fuel consumption of the Mazda CX-80 according to the manufacturer?

On average, the Mazda CX-80 consumes 4 L.

What is the Mazda CX-80’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 60 km.

How much luggage fits in the Mazda CX-80?

Depending on configuration, up to 258 L fit inside.

What drive types are available for the Volvo XC40?

The Volvo XC40 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

How powerful is the Volvo XC40's engine?

Up to 197 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

What is the fuel consumption of the Volvo XC40 according to the manufacturer?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 6.50 L.

What maximum speed does the Volvo XC40 reach?

The Volvo XC40 reaches up to 180 km/h.

What are the Volvo XC40’s length, width and height?

The Volvo XC40 measures 4425 mm long, 1863 mm wide and 1652 mm high.

Mazda CX-80 vs Volvo XC40 - Differences and prices compared

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-80

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Volvo XC40 has a noticeable advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12566 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mazda CX-80 manages with 4 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.50 L. The difference is about 2.50 L per 100 km.

XC40

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 327 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 130 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mazda CX-80 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 6.80 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.60 s. That’s about 0.80 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mazda CX-80 pulls decisively stronger with 550 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 250 Nm difference.

CX-80

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mazda CX-80 offers clearly perceptible more seating capacity – 7 vs 5.

In curb weight, Volvo XC40 is clearly perceptible lighter – 1688 kg compared to 2131 kg. The difference is around 443 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC40 offers convincingly more room – 452 L compared to 258 L. That’s a difference of about 194 L.

When it comes to payload, Mazda CX-80 to a small extent takes the win – 650 kg compared to 532 kg. That’s a difference of about 118 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mazda CX-80 proves to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mazda CX-80 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

Reviews Mazda CX-80

Reviews Volvo XC40

5 (3 Reviews)

Top Car Comparisons

Nissan Qashqai

Volvo XC40

VS

The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …

Volvo XC40

VW T-Roc

VS

The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …

Costs and Consumption
Price 49300 - 61400 £	Price 36800 - 47200 £
Consumption L/100km 4 - 5.6 L	Consumption L/100km 6.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km -	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 60 km	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity -	Battery Capacity -
co2 91 - 146 g/km	co2 147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity -	Fuel tank capacity 54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 7	Seats 5
Doors -	Doors 5
Curb weight 2131 - 2240 kg	Curb weight 1688 kg
Trunk capacity 258 L	Trunk capacity 452 L
Length -	Length 4425 mm
Width 1890 mm	Width 1863 mm
Height -	Height 1652 mm
Max trunk capacity -	Max trunk capacity 1328 L
Payload 649 - 650 kg	Payload 532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV	Engine Type Petrol MHEV
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Automatic Gearbox	Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 254 - 327 HP	Power HP 163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 6.8 - 8.4 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed -	Max Speed 180 km/h
Torque 500 - 550 Nm	Torque 265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders 4 - 6	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 187 - 241 kW	Power kW 120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity 2488 - 3283 cm3	Engine capacity 1969 cm3