Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mazda MX-30 vs Mercedes EQA - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (170 HP vs 292 HP), boot space and price (30800 £ vs 44200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda MX-30 or Mercedes EQA?
MX-30
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mazda MX-30 has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 30800 £ , while the Mercedes EQA costs 44200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 13389 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Mercedes EQA: with 14.40 kWh per 100 km, it’s noticeable more efficient than the Mazda MX-30 with 18.30 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.90 kWh.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQA performs clearly better – achieving up to 561 km, about 476 km more than the Mazda MX-30.
EQA
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQA has a significantly edge – offering 292 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 122 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQA is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 6 s, while the Mazda MX-30 takes 9.10 s. That’s about 3.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Mercedes EQA performs to a small extent better – reaching 160 km/h, while the Mazda MX-30 tops out at 140 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
MX-30
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Mazda MX-30 is slightly lighter – 1849 kg compared to 2045 kg. The difference is around 196 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Mazda MX-30 offers minimal more room – 350 L compared to 340 L. That’s a difference of about 10 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Mercedes EQA performs a bit better – up to 1320 L, which is about 165 L more than the Mazda MX-30.
When it comes to payload, Mercedes EQA barely noticeable takes the win – 425 kg compared to 402 kg. That’s a difference of about 23 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mercedes EQA sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mazda MX-30
Mercedes EQA
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £44,200
Mercedes EQA
Mazda MX-30
4.6 (1 Reviews)
The Mazda MX-30 trades conventional EV practicality for a boutique vibe, wrapping easy urban agility and a stylish, artisan interior into a compact package that stands out in the crossover crowd. It’s ideal for city-minded buyers who value design and driving feel over long-distance trips, and its quirky details prove Mazda can be playful without losing its driver-focused soul.
details
Mercedes EQA
5 (1 Reviews)
The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.
details
Mazda MX-30
Mercedes EQA
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30800 - 37100 £
|
Price
44200 - 57400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.30 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.4 - 16.9 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
85 km
|
Electric Range
476 - 561 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
70.50 kWh
|
|
co2
22 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1849 kg
|
Curb weight
2045 - 2115 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
|
Trunk capacity
340 L
|
|
Length
4395 mm
|
Length
4463 mm
|
|
Width
1848 mm
|
Width
1834 mm
|
|
Height
1555 mm
|
Height
1608 - 1613 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1137 - 1155 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1320 L
|
|
Payload
402 kg
|
Payload
425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
170 HP
|
Power HP
190 - 292 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.10 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
140 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
385 - 520 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
125 kW
|
Power kW
140 - 215 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
830 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
What drivetrain options does the Mazda MX-30 have?
Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.