VS

Mazda MX-30 vs Renault R5 comparison

Compare performance (170 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (30,800 £ vs 24,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda MX-30 or Renault R5?

Mazda MX-30 vs Renault R5: Key differences

Mazda MX-30

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more power
  • only slightly more trunk space
details

Renault R5

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • visibly more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

MX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault R5 is clearly cheaper – starting at 24,000 £ , while the Mazda MX-30 costs 30,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,848 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Renault R5 is visibly more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 18.3 kWh/100km for the Mazda MX-30. That’s a difference of about 3.5 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Renault R5 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 405 km, about 320 km more than the Mazda MX-30.

R5

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda MX-30 offers somewhat more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 20 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault R5 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 8 s, while the Mazda MX-30 takes 9.1 s. That’s about 1.1 s quicker.

MX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault R5 is noticeably lighter – 1,447 kg compared to 1,849 kg. The difference is around 402 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mazda MX-30 offers only slightly more boot space – 350 L compared to 326 L. That’s a difference of about 24 L.

When it comes to payload, the Renault R5 carries barely more – 418 kg compared to 402 kg. That’s a difference of about 16 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault R5 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £24,000
R5

Renault R5

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 122 - 150 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 15.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 307 - 405 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault R5
VW ID.3
VS
Choosing between the retro-inspired Renault 5 and the practical VW ID.3 comes down to whether you value character and compact city agility or proven electric range and grown-up practicality. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show where each car shines and which one fits different kinds …
Renault R5
Kia EV2
VS
The Renault 5 and the Kia EV2 represent two different takes on the compact electric — the Renault 5 leans on retro styling and urban agility, while the Kia EV2 focuses on modern practicality and value. This comparison will help you decide between personality and usable space by looking at range, …
Mazda MX-30
Renault R5

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda MX-30

The Mazda MX-30 trades conventional EV practicality for a boutique vibe, wrapping easy urban agility and a stylish, artisan interior into a compact package that stands out in the crossover crowd. It’s ideal for city-minded buyers who value design and driving feel over long-distance trips, and its quirky details prove Mazda can be playful without losing its driver-focused soul.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_48_highres
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_41_highres
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_28_highres
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_1_highres

Reviews Mazda MX-30

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault R5

The Renault 5 blends classic styling cues with contemporary design, giving it a playful and characterful presence on the road. It’s a city-focused hatchback that feels nimble and cleverly packaged, ideal for drivers who want personality and practicality.

details
D9BB3E56-4B0D-4E48-A734-11A1714B92A5
79A3C149-BC71-4BE3-A149-986DD84D251C
DDEACB99-545B-4C72-B12C-AB35E7B77365

Reviews Renault R5

4.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
Walter
4 Nov 2025, 21:42:46

Practical, nimble, and fun to drive. For rather small drivers up to 1.75 m there's plenty of space even on the back seat. Useful driver-assist systems, and Android Auto works well. Very economical in summer. In winter a lot of energy is used in the first five minutes to bring the battery up to 20°C, which makes consumption on short winter trips very high.

Frequently compared as well

Renault R5
CUPRA Raval
VS
The Renault R5 and the CUPRA Raval represent two very different takes on the compact electric car — the Renault R5 leans on retro charm and urban practicality, while the CUPRA Raval emphasizes sporty dynamics and bold design. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they stack up on …
Renault R5
VW ID.Polo
VS
This short comparison pits the Renault 5 against the Volkswagen ID. Polo to help you choose which compact electric suits your needs. We'll focus on design, range, practicality, driving feel and ownership costs so you can pick the right city car.
Renault R5
Renault Twingo
VS
Deciding between the Renault 5 and the Renault Twingo comes down to whether you prefer the retro-inspired style and modern reinterpretation of the 5 or the Twingo’s proven compact practicality. This comparison focuses on driving character, interior space, running costs and everyday usability to …
CUPRA Born
Renault R5
VS
The CUPRA Born feels grown-up and focused — a proper hot‑hatch–inspired EV with genuine pace, sensible range and more practical space than its looks suggest, while the Renault 5 is a cheeky, retro‑flavoured city car built to charm tight streets rather than scorch the autobahn. Choose the Born if …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Renault Clio
Renault R5
VS
The Clio is the sensible, all-weather hatch — efficient, tech-rich and practical for families and commuters who want a solid everyday car. The R5 is a cheeky retro reboot with electric city credentials and heaps of character — pick the Clio for logic and space, the R5 for style and smile-inducing …
Renault R5
Volvo EX30
VS
The Renault 5 brings playful retro charm and clever city-sized packaging, while the Volvo EX30 feels like a pocket rocket from the future with serious EV range and safety tech. If you want personality and urban thrift go R5, but if you crave rapid electric shove, cutting-edge gadgets and …
Renault R5
Toyota Yaris
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Renault R5 and Toyota Yaris offer distinctive takes on compact car design and functionality. The Renault R5 impresses with its retro-modern aesthetic and nimble handling, making it a joy for urban driving. Meanwhile, the Toyota Yaris shines with its reliability and …
Mazda MX-30
Renault R5

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,800 - 37,100 £
Price
24,000 - 27,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 15.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
85 km
Electric Range
307 - 405 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
22 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,849 kg
Curb weight
1,447 - 1,524 kg
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
Trunk capacity
326 L
Length
4,395 mm
Length
-
Width
1,848 mm
Width
1,744 mm
Height
1,555 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,137 - 1,155 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
402 kg
Payload
396 - 418 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
170 HP
Power HP
122 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8 - 9 s
Max Speed
140 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
-
Torque
225 - 245 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
125 kW
Power kW
90 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
830 cm3
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Renault
What drivetrain options does the Mazda MX-30 have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.