VS

Mazda MX-30 vs VW T-Cross comparison

Compare performance (170 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (30,800 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda MX-30 or VW T-Cross?

Mazda MX-30 vs VW T-Cross: Key differences

Mazda MX-30

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • slightly more power
details

VW T-Cross

4 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • very slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • considerably lighter
  • markedly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

MX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

VW T-Cross is considerably cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Mazda MX-30 costs 30,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,454 £.

T-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mazda MX-30 offers slightly more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 20 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the VW T-Cross is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.4 s, while the Mazda MX-30 takes 9.1 s. That’s about 0.7 s quicker.

MX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, VW T-Cross is considerably lighter – 1,267 kg compared to 1,849 kg. The difference is around 582 kg.

Looking at boot space, the VW T-Cross offers markedly more boot space – 455 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 105 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW T-Cross carries moderately more – 480 kg compared to 402 kg. That’s a difference of about 78 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mazda MX-30 is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £30,800
MX-30

Mazda MX-30

  • Engine Type Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 170 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 18.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 85 km
details

Frequently compared as well

SEAT Arona
VW T-Cross
VS
The SEAT Arona and the VW T-Cross are closely matched compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want city-friendly dimensions, practical interiors and a touch of SUV style. This comparison focuses on space, fuel economy, driving feel, safety and running costs to help you decide which suits your …
Toyota Yaris Cross
VW T-Cross
VS
Choosing between the Toyota Yaris Cross and the VW T‑Cross means deciding whether you want Toyota’s hybrid efficiency and nimble city manners or Volkswagen’s more conventional, spacious small SUV package. The Yaris Cross focuses on low running costs and urban agility, while the T‑Cross delivers a …
Mazda MX-30
VW T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda MX-30

The Mazda MX-30 trades conventional EV practicality for a boutique vibe, wrapping easy urban agility and a stylish, artisan interior into a compact package that stands out in the crossover crowd. It’s ideal for city-minded buyers who value design and driving feel over long-distance trips, and its quirky details prove Mazda can be playful without losing its driver-focused soul.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_48_highres
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_41_highres
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_28_highres
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_1_highres

Reviews Mazda MX-30

4.6 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

VW T-Cross

The VW T-Cross is a small, city-friendly crossover that blends practical packaging with easygoing driving manners and a high seating position for good visibility. It’s a sensible, comfortable choice for buyers who want the convenience and style of an SUV without big compromises.

details
DB2021AU01108_medium
DB2021AU01109_medium
DB2021AU01111_medium
DB2021AU01114_medium
DB2021AU01120_medium
DB2021AU01124_medium

Reviews VW T-Cross

4 (5 Reviews)
rate
Arturo
27 May 2026, 04:19:26

In terms of interior space and driving, the T‑Cross is far superior.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Monika
12 Feb 2026, 07:34:19

I chose the T‑Cross — more comfortable and roomier inside, especially for adult passengers; bought on the model‑year clearance — running costs work out cheaper even taking into account fuel savings from the Toyota hybrid (planned over five years); I like the space and the VW suited me better — I prefer the view through the front windshield.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Erasmo Paone
21 Oct 2025, 21:49:59

Very practical, interior space is excellent. Lacks charm, fuel consumption is a bit high.

Frequently compared as well

VW T-Cross
VW Taigo
VS
Meet the VW T‑Cross and VW Taigo: two compact crossovers from Volkswagen chasing the same urban buyers but with very different personalities — the practical, upright T‑Cross versus the swoopy, style-first Taigo. Read on to see which one earns a place in your driveway, whether you prize family …
VW Golf
VW T-Cross
VS
Deciding between the VW Golf and the VW T‑Cross comes down to whether you want a traditional hatchback with sharper driving dynamics or a compact crossover that prioritizes space, practicality and a higher seating position. The Golf rewards with more engaging handling and a refined interior, while …
VW Polo
VW T-Cross
VS
The VW Polo is a nimble, wallet-friendly hatch that makes city driving and tight parking effortless, while the VW T-Cross trades the Polo’s sprightliness for SUV practicality — higher seating, a roomier boot and a more commanding road presence. Pick the Polo if you want cheap, lively motoring; …
Renault Captur
VW T-Cross
VS
In the compact crossover showdown, the Renault Captur dazzles with bold styling, quirky customization and clever interior tricks, while the VW T-Cross takes a quieter route—solid build, practical space and no-nonsense usability. Choose the Captur if you want personality and fun; pick the T‑Cross if …
Opel Frontera
VW T-Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Opel Frontera and the VW T-Cross, the Frontera stands out with its robust off-road capabilities and rugged design, catering to adventure enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the T-Cross impresses with its urban practicality, spacious interior, and advanced tech features, …
Toyota Corolla Cross
VW T-Cross
VS
Toyota Corolla Cross and VW T-Cross go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Toyota Corolla …
Jeep Avenger
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Jeep Avenger stands out with its rugged styling and off-road capabilities, appealing to adventure enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the VW T-Cross offers a more refined approach with its sleek design and practical interior, making it an ideal choice for urban …
Nissan Juke
VW T-Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Nissan Juke and VW T-Cross stand out with their distinctive designs and dynamic performance. The Juke’s bold styling and spirited driving experience appeal to those seeking a sportier vibe, while the T-Cross offers practicality and a spacious interior, …
Mazda MX-30
VW T-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
30,800 - 37,100 £
Price
21,400 - 32,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
85 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
22 g/km
co2
124 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,849 kg
Curb weight
1,267 - 1,338 kg
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
Trunk capacity
455 L
Length
4,395 mm
Length
-
Width
1,848 mm
Width
1,784 mm
Height
1,555 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,137 - 1,155 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
402 kg
Payload
463 - 480 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
170 HP
Power HP
95 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.4 - 11.3 s
Max Speed
140 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
-
Torque
175 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
125 kW
Power kW
70 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
830 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
Mazda
Brand
VW
What drivetrain options does the Mazda MX-30 have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.