VS

Mercedes C-Class EQ vs MG ZS comparison

Compare performance (489 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (58,000 £ vs 18,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes C-Class EQ or MG ZS?

Mercedes C-Class EQ vs MG ZS: Key differences

Mercedes C-Class EQ

  • clearly more power
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely more trunk space
details

MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • clearly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

C-Class EQ

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

MG ZS is clearly cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Mercedes C-Class EQ costs 58,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 40,047 £.

ZS

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes C-Class EQ offers clearly more power – delivering 489 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 292 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes C-Class EQ is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.7 s. That’s about 4.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes C-Class EQ delivers substantially more torque with 800 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 652 Nm more.

C-Class EQ

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is clearly lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 2,460 kg. The difference is around 1,130 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes C-Class EQ offers barely more boot space – 470 L compared to 443 L. That’s a difference of about 27 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes C-Class EQ carries only slightly more – 505 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 35 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes C-Class EQ is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £58,000
C-Class EQ

Mercedes C-Class EQ

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 489 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.3 - 15.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 706 - 753 km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
Kia Sportage
MG ZS
VS
The Kia Sportage and MG ZS are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want practical, everyday family transport—each offers a different mix of comfort, technology and value. This quick comparison shows how the Sportage’s more refined ride and stronger engine choices compare with the ZS’s budget-friendly …
Mercedes C-Class EQ
MG ZS

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mercedes C-Class EQ

The Mercedes C‑Class EQ blends the familiar poise and luxury of the C‑Class with Mercedes' EQ electric ethos, delivering a quietly refined and modern driving experience. Inside, it pairs upscale materials and tech-forward touches with a composed ride that suits both city commuting and longer journeys.

details
2027-mercedes-benz-c-class-ev
2027-mercedes-benz-c-class-ev (1)
2027-mercedes-benz-c-class-ev (2)
2027-mercedes-benz-c-class-ev (3)
2027-mercedes-benz-c-class-ev (4)
2027-mercedes-benz-c-class-ev (5)
2027-mercedes-benz-c-class-ev (6)
2027-mercedes-benz-c-class-ev (7)
2027-mercedes-benz-c-class-ev (9)
2027-mercedes-benz-c-class-ev (8)
2027-mercedes-benz-c-class-ev

Reviews Mercedes C-Class EQ

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

MG ZS

The MG ZS is a compact crossover that delivers strong value with a roomy cabin and straightforward tech, making it a sensible choice for budget-minded buyers. It’s easy to live with, offering comfortable rides and a practical layout that suits daily commutes and family errands.

details
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-07
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-21
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-luxury_interior
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-16

Reviews MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
Constantin
9 Jun 2026, 22:34:01

I replaced my Dacia Jogger with an MG ZS Hybrid and I don't regret it.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ahmed
30 Sept 2025, 14:05:11

With all the features it offers at that price, the MG has no competition. A BMW X1 of similar dimensions with a few extra upgrades costs more than twice as much, and considering that 40% of MG’s spare parts come from Germany (Bosch, Continental, etc.), I’d go for the MG ZS Hybrid without a second thought.

Frequently compared as well

Mercedes C-Class EQ
Mercedes GLC EQ
VS
Comparing the Mercedes C‑Class EQ and the Mercedes GLC EQ pits a sleek, electrically powered executive saloon against a compact electric SUV — two different takes on premium Mercedes electrification. This brief comparison will focus on their size, practicality, driving feel and tech so you can …
Ford Kuga
MG ZS
VS
The Ford Kuga and MG ZS are compact SUVs that both promise practicality and value, but they target different priorities: the Kuga leans toward sharper handling, a more refined cabin and a wider range of powertrains, while the ZS focuses on affordability and simple, roomy practicality. Choose the …
MG ZS
Nissan Juke
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Nissan Juke pits a practical, value-oriented small SUV (the MG ZS) against a more stylised, compact crossover with sharper driving character (the Nissan Juke). This quick guide highlights how they differ in space, equipment, engines and running costs so you can pick the …
MG ZS
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …
MG ZS
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the MG ZS and Toyota Yaris Cross present compelling choices for consumers seeking style and versatility. The MG ZS impresses with its value-for-money proposition, spacious interior, and bold design, while the Toyota Yaris Cross offers a refined driving …
Citroen C3 Aircross
MG ZS
VS
Citroen C3 Aircross and MG ZS go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Citroen C3 Aircross or …
MG MG3
MG ZS
VS
Choosing between the compact MG3 hatchback and the larger MG ZS crossover comes down to whether you prioritise city-friendly agility and low running costs or interior space and practicality. This comparison covers driving character, equipment, fuel economy and ownership costs to help you pick the …
Dacia Duster
MG ZS
VS
In the battle of budget-friendly SUVs, the Dacia Duster squares off against the MG ZS, each offering distinct charms. The Dacia Duster is renowned for its rugged durability and remarkable off-road capability, making it a favorite for those seeking adventure without breaking the bank. Meanwhile, the …
Mercedes C-Class EQ
MG ZS

Costs and Consumption
Price
58,000 - 67,600 £
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.3 - 15.6 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
706 - 753 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
115 - 145 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Sedan
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,460 kg
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
Trunk capacity
470 L
Trunk capacity
443 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,892 mm
Width
1,818 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 kg
Payload
375 - 470 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
489 HP
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
800 Nm
Torque
148 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
360 kW
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
MG
Is the Mercedes C-Class EQ offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.