VS

Mercedes C Class Sedan vs VW T-Roc comparison

Compare performance (680 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (41,300 £ vs 26,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes C Class Sedan or VW T-Roc?

Mercedes C Class Sedan vs VW T-Roc: Key differences

Mercedes C Class Sedan

  • significantly more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • visibly more trunk space

VW T-Roc

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • a bit lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

C Class Sedan

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

VW T-Roc is considerably cheaper – starting at 26,400 £ , while the Mercedes C Class Sedan costs 41,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,887 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mercedes C Class Sedan uses 1.6 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 3.9 L/100km.

T-Roc

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes C Class Sedan offers significantly more power – delivering 680 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 530 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes C Class Sedan is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.4 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.9 s. That’s about 5.5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes C Class Sedan delivers considerably more torque with 1,020 Nm compared to 250 Nm. That’s about 770 Nm more.

C Class Sedan

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, VW T-Roc is a bit lighter – 1,465 kg compared to 1,695 kg. The difference is around 230 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes C Class Sedan offers visibly more boot space – 455 L compared to 284 L. That’s a difference of about 171 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes C Class Sedan carries only slightly more – 570 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 55 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes C Class Sedan is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £41,300
C Class Sedan

Mercedes C Class Sedan

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 183 - 680 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.6 - 9 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 11 - 117 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Lexus LBX
VW T-Roc
VS
The Lexus LBX feels like a posh city cocoon — whisper-quiet, well-stitched and leaning into hybrid efficiency and premium touches — while the VW T‑Roc is a cheeky, practical all-rounder that drives with more snap, offers more space and gives better value for the money. Choose the LBX if you want …
Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
Skoda Kamiq is the sensible choice — clever packaging, a surprisingly big boot and a friendlier price tag make it the practical everyman’s crossover. If you crave sharper styling, a firmer, more engaging drive and a touch more tech polish, the VW T‑Roc feels more premium, but expect to pay a little …
Mercedes C Class Sedan
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mercedes C Class Sedan

The Mercedes C‑Class is the compact executive that dresses like it owns the boulevard, with an interior that blends modern elegance and plush comfort to make everyday driving feel unexpectedly special. On the road it pairs poise with a hint of cheeky agility, rewarding drivers who want refinement without forfeiting a touch of fun — and yes, it still looks great in the driveway.

details
21C0295_008
21C0295_012
21C0295_018
21C0297_041
21C0297_069

Reviews Mercedes C Class Sedan

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

VW T-Roc

The VW T-Roc mixes cheeky, coupe-like styling with the everyday sense and space of an SUV, so it looks fun without sacrificing family sense. It’s a likeable all-rounder with tidy road manners and plenty of personality, ideal if you want a car that’s practical enough for chores but entertaining enough to enjoy.

details
DB2025AU01832_medium
DB2025AU01833_medium
DB2025AU01840_medium
DB2025AU01844_medium
DB2025AU01835_medium
DB2025AU01866_medium
DB2025AU01834_medium
DB2025AU01852_medium

Reviews VW T-Roc

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
Ester
17 Sept 2025, 14:29:41

I've been driving the VW T‑Roc for a few months now and I'm totally satisfied. 🚗 The higher seating position gives me a great feeling of security and the visibility in city traffic is excellent. I especially like the modern infotainment system — everything works intuitively and quickly. On the motorway it feels very calm and stable, even at higher speeds. Overall a great car that's a lot of fun and still economical.

Frequently compared as well

VW Golf
VW T-Roc
VS
The VW Golf still sets the benchmark in the compact class — a composed, all‑round hatch that rewards drivers with precise steering, efficient engines and sensible practicality for daily life. The VW T‑Roc trades a bit of that pinch‑perfect poise for SUV style, a higher seating position and a …
SEAT Arona
VW T-Roc
VS
Sibling rivalry in compact-SUV clothing: the SEAT Arona and VW T‑Roc go head-to-head — one brings Spanish spice and value, the other German polish and refinement. We’ll compare driving feel, practicality, tech and running costs so you can pick the compact crossover that deserves a spot in your …
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
The SEAT Ateca is the sensible, roomy sibling that prioritises practicality and comfort, while the VW T‑Roc plays the cooler, more characterful role with sharper styling and a slightly cheekier drive — both share the VW Group's solid underpinnings and similar engines. Choose the Ateca if you need …
Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling …
Skoda Karoq
VW T-Roc
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible family hero — roomy boot, comfortable seats and clever practicality — while the VW T‑Roc swaps some of that pragmatism for sharper styling and a livelier, more involving drive. Choose the Karoq for space and value, the T‑Roc if you want personality and a bit more fun …
Renault Captur
VW T-Roc
VS
The Renault Captur and VW T-Roc both stand out in the compact SUV segment, each offering unique strengths to cater to different audiences. The Captur boasts a stylish, urban design with customizable options and a focus on fuel efficiency, making it perfect for city dwellers. In contrast, the T-Roc …
Audi A3 Sportback
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive realm of compact cars, the Audi A3 Sportback and VW T-Roc both offer distinct advantages that cater to different preferences. While the A3 Sportback boasts a premium interior and refined performance, the T-Roc shines with its versatility, spaciousness, and slightly higher driving …
Mercedes C Class Sedan
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
Price
41,300 - 103,400 £
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
11 - 117 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
19.5 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
41 - 205 g/km
co2
126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
50 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Sedan
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
4
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,695 - 2,195 kg
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
Trunk capacity
315 - 455 L
Trunk capacity
284 L
Length
4,751 mm
Length
-
Width
1,820 - 1,900 mm
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
Height
1,438 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
480 - 570 kg
Payload
368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
183 - 680 HP
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.4 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
235 - 250 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 1,020 Nm
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
135 - 500 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1,496 - 1,999 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, B, D, G
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
VW
What drivetrain options does the Mercedes C Class Sedan have?

The Mercedes C Class Sedan is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.