VS

Mercedes Citan Transporter vs Nissan Interstar comparison

Compare performance (131 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (21,700 £ vs 36,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Citan Transporter or Nissan Interstar?

Mercedes Citan Transporter vs Nissan Interstar: Key differences

Mercedes Citan Transporter

  • substantially cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • substantially lighter
details

Nissan Interstar

  • markedly more power
  • markedly more electric range
details

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Citan Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mercedes Citan Transporter is substantially cheaper – starting at 21,700 £ , while the Nissan Interstar costs 36,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,418 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Mercedes Citan Transporter uses 5.1 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Nissan Interstar with 7.5 L/100km. The difference is about 2.4 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Nissan Interstar offers markedly more range – reaching up to 410 km, about 120 km more than the Mercedes Citan Transporter.

Interstar

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Nissan Interstar offers markedly more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 131 HP. That’s roughly 39 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Nissan Interstar delivers visibly more torque with 380 Nm compared to 270 Nm. That’s about 110 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: Mercedes Citan Transporter offers more seats – 5 vs 3.

In terms of curb weight, Mercedes Citan Transporter is substantially lighter – 1,381 kg compared to 2,053 kg. The difference is around 672 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Nissan Interstar carries significantly more – 1,447 kg compared to 787 kg. That’s a difference of about 660 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes Citan Transporter holds a narrow overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £21,700
Citan Transporter

Mercedes Citan Transporter

  • Engine Type Diesel, Petrol, Electric
  • Transmission Manual, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 95 - 131 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.1 - 6.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 18.7 - 21.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 262 - 290 km
Mercedes Citan Transporter
Nissan Interstar

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mercedes Citan Transporter

The Mercedes Citan is a practical, city-friendly van that blends Mercedes' premium touches with sensible commercial utility — it's nimble in tight streets, easy to load, and feels more polished than its price suggests. For small-business owners who want something professional-looking without fuss, the Citan is a dependable workhorse that won’t embarrass you at client meetings and is surprisingly pleasant to drive.

details

Nissan Interstar

The Nissan Interstar is a sensible, no-nonsense panel van that puts practicality front and center, with a cavernous load area and a durable feel built for daily work. It drives with surprising composure for its size, keeps running costs modest, and feels like the kind of professional tool that prefers reliable service over flashy showboating.

details
Mercedes Citan Transporter
Nissan Interstar

Costs and Consumption

Price
21,700 - 33,300 £
Price
36,200 - 54,800 £
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
7.5 - 7.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.7 - 21.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
262 - 290 km
Electric Range
410 km
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 156 g/km
co2
0 - 205 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
3
Doors
4 - 5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,381 - 1,939 kg
Curb weight
2,053 - 2,455 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
-
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
Length
-
Width
1,859 mm
Width
2,080 mm
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
2,900 - 3,620 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
449 - 787 kg
Payload
1,045 - 1,447 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel, Petrol, Electric
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission
Manual, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
95 - 131 HP
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
11.7 - 13.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
132 - 183 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
240 - 270 Nm
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
70 - 96 kW
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
Engine capacity
1,332 - 1,461 cm3
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3

General

Model Year
2,021 - 2,024
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, F, D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Nissan
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.