VS

Mercedes EQA vs Audi Q4 e-tron comparison

Compare performance (228 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (45,900 £ vs 40,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQA or Audi Q4 e-tron?

Mercedes EQA vs Audi Q4 e-tron: Key differences

Mercedes EQA

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
details

Audi Q4 e-tron

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately cheaper
  • noticeably more power
  • slightly more efficient
  • a bit more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
  • markedly more trunk space
details

By Achim Sedelmaier

EQA

The battle between electric SUVs is heating up, with two giants in the automotive industry stepping into the ring: the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Mercedes EQA. Both vehicles offer a fusion of advanced electric technology, luxurious features, and versatility. However, they each carry distinct characteristics that appeal to different preferences and driving styles. In this comparison, we’ll delve into the technical aspects, innovations, and overall performance of these two remarkable models.

Q4 e-tron

Design and Body Type

Both the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Mercedes EQA fall under the SUV category, boasting a compact yet powerful design. The Q4 e-tron measures 4588 mm in length, 1865 mm in width, and 1632 mm in height, giving it a robust stance on the road. In contrast, the EQA is slightly smaller at 4463 mm in length and 1834 mm in width, but its sleek lines and signature Mercedes aesthetics present a sophisticated look. Both vehicles come with five doors and comfortably seat up to five passengers, making them practical choices for families and urban living.

EQA

Powertrains and Performance

When it comes to propulsion, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers a range of power options, including rear-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations. The power output varies from 170 HP to a thrilling 340 HP. With acceleration times ranging from a solid 9 seconds to an impressive 5.4 seconds from 0 to 100 km/h, the Q4 e-tron showcases its sporty capabilities.

On the other hand, the Mercedes EQA presents its own array of power options, with capacities lying between 190 HP and 292 HP. The EQA accelerates slightly slower than its Audi counterpart, clocking in at 8.6 seconds for the base model and 6 seconds for the top-tier variant. While the acceleration performance of the EQA is commendable, it does tend to lag behind the Q4 e-tron in speed, offering a maximum of 160 km/h compared to Q4's higher variant speed of 180 km/h.

Q4 e-tron

Battery and Range

The Audi Q4 e-tron features two battery configurations, with a capacity of either 52 kWh or 77 kWh. The vehicle offers an impressive electric range, with the maximum reaching up to 554 km. Despite its larger dimensions, the efficiency of the Q4 e-tron is evident, with electric consumption figures ranging between 15.9 kWh/100km and 17.4 kWh/100km.

Conversely, the Mercedes EQA is equipped with battery options of 66.5 kWh and 70.5 kWh. It also presents a strong electric range, with numbers varying between 458 km and 561 km. Its consumption figures are quite favorable, averaging around 14.4 kWh/100km and 16.9 kWh/100km, allowing it a slight edge in efficiency.

EQA

Interior and Technology

Both vehicles provide a blend of luxury and functionality inside. The Q4 e-tron prides itself on its high-quality materials, spacious interior, and a technologically advanced MMI infotainment system that supports various connectivity options. Cargo space in the Q4 e-tron measures a generous 535 liters, ensuring ample room for luggage or shopping.

The EQA, while it has a smaller trunk capacity of 340 liters, boasts a modern interior featuring Mercedes' latest MBUX infotainment interface, which is renowned for its intuitive usability. Both vehicles prioritize comfort, with a focus on driver and passenger ergonomics. However, the choice between the two may hinge on personal preference for either Audi or Mercedes' design philosophy.

Q4 e-tron

Conclusion: Which One to Choose?

In conclusion, the choice between the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Mercedes EQA primarily depends on individual preferences and needs. The Q4 e-tron is ideal for those who prioritize performance and a larger electric range, while the EQA may appeal to consumers looking for cutting-edge technology and efficient energy consumption in a slightly more compact package.

Ultimately, both vehicles stand as excellent representations of their respective brands, setting high standards in the electric SUV market. Whether you lean towards Audi's sporty performance or Mercedes’ elegant technology, you’re bound to be impressed by the innovations and capabilities these electric SUVs offer.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EQA

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Audi Q4 e-tron is moderately cheaper – starting at 40,700 £ , while the Mercedes EQA costs 45,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,160 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Audi Q4 e-tron is slightly more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 16.9 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQA. That’s a difference of about 2.1 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers a bit more range – reaching up to 592 km, about 116 km more than the Mercedes EQA.

Q4 e-tron

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers noticeably more power – delivering 340 HP compared to 228 HP. That’s roughly 112 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q4 e-tron is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 5.4 s, while the Mercedes EQA takes 7.7 s. That’s about 2.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers substantially more torque with 679 Nm compared to 390 Nm. That’s about 289 Nm more.

EQA

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q4 e-tron is marginally lighter – 2,035 kg compared to 2,115 kg. The difference is around 80 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers markedly more boot space – 535 L compared to 340 L. That’s a difference of about 195 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q4 e-tron carries somewhat more – 515 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 90 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £40,700
Q4 e-tron

Audi Q4 e-tron

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 204 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 440 - 592 km
Mercedes EQA
Audi Q4 e-tron

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mercedes EQA

The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.

details

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron blends Audi’s clean, modern styling with a practical, well-built interior, making it a refined option for buyers who want a premium electric compact SUV. It offers a quiet, composed ride and intuitive tech, so it’s well suited to daily commuting and family duties while keeping the switch to electric straightforward.

details
Mercedes EQA
Audi Q4 e-tron

Costs and Consumption

Price
45,900 - 54,900 £
Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
476 km
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,115 kg
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
Trunk capacity
340 L
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,834 mm
Width
1,865 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
425 kg
Payload
505 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
228 HP
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
390 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
168 kW
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Audi
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.