VS

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Skoda Enyaq comparison

Compare performance (340 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (40,700 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Audi Q4 e-tron or Skoda Enyaq?

Audi Q4 e-tron vs Skoda Enyaq: Key differences

Audi Q4 e-tron

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly more efficient
  • barely more electric range
  • marginally lighter
details

Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • a bit cheaper
  • barely more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Q4 e-tron

Quick take: Audi Q4 e-tron VS Skoda Enyaq — what this matchup is really about

The Audi Q4 e-tron and Skoda Enyaq are two compact electric SUVs often cross-shopped, and this Audi Q4 e-tron VS Skoda Enyaq comparison focuses on what actually matters to buyers. Both prioritize quiet, long-distance comfort and roomy rears, but they take different routes to get there. The Q4 leans on Audi's premium cues—subtle presentation, tactile basics and a composed driving personality—while the Enyaq amplifies space, straightforward usability and clear value for everyday family duties. Read on for practical contrasts that turn specs into real-world trade-offs you’ll notice on the road and at the supermarket car park.

Enyaq

Character and driving dynamics

Driving the Audi Q4 e-tron feels like stepping into a measured, rule-following companion: steering is precise enough for confident motorway cruising and the chassis keeps body motions controlled rather than thrilling. The Skoda Enyaq, by contrast, favors a softer, more comfortable tuning that removes bumps and distractions but also dilutes steering feedback and sporty intent. Fit a Q4 with S line or larger wheels and you’ll trade some serenity for a firmer, more alert response; most Enyaq setups keep things deliberately relaxed. Put simply, choose the Q4 if you want a little more engagement without losing composure, choose the Enyaq if you want the gentlest, least demanding drive.

Q4 e-tron

Comfort and long-distance behavior

On long trips both the Audi Q4 e-tron and Skoda Enyaq excel at keeping occupants calm, but the Enyaq nudges ahead on sheer serenity thanks to exceptional noise insulation and cushioned suspension. The Q4 still impresses with a hushed cabin and a slightly firmer chassis that feels composed at speed, and its physical climate controls make small adjustments less fiddly on long runs. If you plan frequent DC charging stops the Audi’s stronger top-end charge capability can shorten breaks and alter route planning in your favour. If your priority is carrying lots of luggage with minimal fuss the Enyaq’s larger, more practical boot reduces the stress of packing for family trips.

Enyaq

Cabin feel and perceived quality

Expectations matter: the Audi Q4 e-tron presents an unmistakably Audi interior layout, but closer inspection reveals some hard plastics in rear doors and trim areas that temper the premium promise. The Skoda Enyaq, meanwhile, trades badge prestige for clean, well-thought-out surfaces and clever storage that feel honest and often more practical than luxurious. Controls are a clear divider—Audi’s mix of physical climate buttons and streamlined menus is friendlier on the move, whereas Skoda’s touchscreen-first setup has improved but still lacks tactile shortcuts some drivers prefer. If you equate quality with brand and trim details the Q4 will satisfy visually; if you judge by everyday ergonomics and storage, the Enyaq often wins on sense over show.

Q4 e-tron

Practicality and family usability

As family cars the Audi Q4 e-tron and Skoda Enyaq each bring useful strengths: the Q4’s flat rear floor and generous rear legroom make three-across seating and child-seat installation easier. The Enyaq’s advantage is an unmistakably bigger, squarer boot and practical loading details that make strollers, suitcases and DIY trips less of a puzzle. Neither car offers extra front luggage space, so cable storage becomes a real consideration—Q4 owners frequently call out awkward cable access when the main boot is full. If cargo capability and everyday utility top your list, the Enyaq is the more pragmatic choice; if rear passenger comfort and a slightly more premium ambience are priorities, the Q4 fits better.

Enyaq

City friendliness, buyer fit and the practical next step

In town both cars are easier to live with than their footprint suggests, but nuances decide the right buyer: the Audi Q4 e-tron’s tighter turning feel in RWD trims and better tactile controls suit urban commuters who value polish and fuss-free operation. The Skoda Enyaq’s roomy doors, excellent visibility and simple ergonomics make city loading, school runs and everyday life less stressful, and its pricing leans toward buyers who want more space per pound. Choose the Q4 if you prize Audi presentation, crisper controls and a small edge in charging speed on longer runs; choose the Enyaq if you want maximum usable cargo space, quieter long-haul cruising and a stronger price-to-space ratio. The technical comparison that follows will dig into range behavior, charging pace, exact boot usability and pricing so you can match those trade-offs to your daily routine.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Elroq
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Enyaq and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you want a spacious, all-electric family SUV or a more compact, conventionally powered crossover focused on practicality. I’ll highlight the real-world differences — range and running costs, interior space and usability, …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7
VS
The Skoda Enyaq and the VW ID.7 share the VW Group’s MEB electric platform, but they’re aimed at different buyers. The Enyaq is a practical, family-focused SUV that emphasizes interior space, usability and value, while the ID.7 is a sleek, aerodynamic saloon tuned for long-range efficiency and …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Q4 e-tron

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Skoda Enyaq is a bit cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the Audi Q4 e-tron costs 40,700 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,866 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Audi Q4 e-tron is very slightly more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 14.9 kWh/100km for the Skoda Enyaq. That’s a difference of about 0.1 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers barely more range – reaching up to 592 km, about 3 km more than the Skoda Enyaq.

Enyaq

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

Both models deliver identical power – 340 HP each.

Both models accelerate almost equally fast – 5.4 s from 0 to 100 km/h.

Both models offer the same torque – 679 Nm.

Q4 e-tron

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q4 e-tron is marginally lighter – 2,035 kg compared to 2,074 kg. The difference is around 39 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Enyaq offers barely more boot space – 585 L compared to 535 L. That’s a difference of about 50 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Enyaq carries barely more – 526 kg compared to 515 kg. That’s a difference of about 11 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Enyaq sits just ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £36,800
Enyaq

Skoda Enyaq

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 190 - 340 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 449 - 589 km
details
Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron blends Audi’s clean, modern styling with a practical, well-built interior, making it a refined option for buyers who want a premium electric compact SUV. It offers a quiet, composed ride and intuitive tech, so it’s well suited to daily commuting and family duties while keeping the switch to electric straightforward.

details
A213272_overfull
A213273_overfull
A213248_overfull
A213261_overfull
A213263_overfull
A213264_overfull

Reviews Audi Q4 e-tron

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Alain
10 Jun 2026, 00:16:47

A more attractive vehicle inside and out, with German reliability.

Skoda Enyaq

The Skoda Enyaq is a practical and well-appointed electric SUV that blends a roomy interior and everyday usability with clean, understated design. It’s a comfortable, efficient choice for buyers who want a sensible electric family car without flash, backed by solid build quality and clever practicality.

details
04_new_skoda_enyaq_68cf74d6-1920x1280
11_new_skoda_enyaq_c2b962a0-1920x1280
12_new_skoda_enyaq_de0afe4c-1920x1280
33_new_skoda_enyaq_833cbb5e-1920x1440
48_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_dad4ad75-1920x1280
49_new_skoda_enyaq_interior_37c35e34-1920x1280
50_new_skoda_enyaq_coupe_f55ae8bb-1920x1858

Reviews Skoda Enyaq

4.4 (6 Reviews)
rate
Delporte
16 May 2026, 16:33:37

More options and more room for discounts and negotiation, just as comfortable, better than a Hyundai Ioniq 5 (which is not comfortable at all), a Toyota bZ4X (feels cramped and has little space), a Tesla Model Y Premium (a bit too high-tech for me but otherwise fine), a Jaecoo 5 (entry-level, comfort impeccable but no options and little tech), and an Omoda (less comfortable and very few options). This is all a personal opinion — we drove the cars mentioned above and the Skoda seems the best value for money with good comfort, a variety of options and reliable after-sales service close to us.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Alfaknaggen
11 Mar 2026, 18:30:11

Well‑thought-out and practical car (85x MY2024) that unfortunately lets you down because of system bugs and irritating driver‑assist systems that can't cope with ordinary autumn or winter weather without throwing up error messages and warnings.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q4 e-tron
Volvo EX40
VS
Comparing the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Volvo EX40 pits two compact premium electric SUVs against each other: the Q4 e-tron brings Audi’s refined driving dynamics and a traditionally upscale cabin, while the EX40 focuses on minimalist Scandinavian design, safety, and efficiency. Choose the Q4 for a …
Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX1
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and BMW iX1 are compact electric SUVs that aim to balance everyday practicality with distinct brand characters — the Q4 e-tron leans toward refined comfort and a premium cabin, while the iX1 emphasizes sporty handling and tech-forward features. This comparison will walk you …
Ford Explorer EV
Skoda Enyaq
VS
Here’s a clear comparison between the Ford Explorer EV and the Skoda Enyaq to help determine which electric SUV suits your needs. I’ll focus on driving range, interior space, technology and overall value so you can pick the right balance of practicality and performance.
Skoda Enyaq
Kia EV5
VS
Comparing the Škoda Enyaq and the Kia EV5 pits two spacious, family-friendly electric SUVs against each other: the Enyaq focuses on practicality, value and a straightforward user experience, while the EV5 emphasizes cutting-edge cabin tech, distinctive styling and a more premium feel. This short …
Skoda Enyaq
VW ID.7 Touring
VS
Comparing the Skoda Enyaq and the Volkswagen ID.7 Touring pits a practical, roomy electric SUV against a sleek, long-distance electric estate. Both share VW Group underpinnings, but the Enyaq prioritizes interior space and value while the ID.7 Touring focuses on aerodynamic efficiency, range and …
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Kodiaq target very different buyers: the Enyaq is an all-electric SUV focused on efficiency, modern tech and city-friendly driving, while the Kodiaq is a larger, traditional family SUV offering seven seats, greater towing and cargo capacity. This quick comparison highlights …
Skoda Enyaq
Volvo EX60
VS
Practical Czech engineering goes up against Swedish style in our showdown between the Skoda Enyaq and the Volvo EX60. The Enyaq focuses on roomy practicality and sensible value, while the EX60 answers with sharper design, richer tech and a more premium feel — choose based on whether you want …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Elroq
VS
Deciding between the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you value Audi’s premium feel and refined driving experience or Skoda’s clever packaging and better value. The Q4 e-tron focuses on high-quality materials, tech and a composed ride, while the Elroq prioritises interior …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Enyaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
Price
36,800 - 52,800 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 15.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
Electric Range
449 - 589 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
Curb weight
2,074 - 2,284 kg
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
Trunk capacity
570 - 585 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,865 mm
Width
1,879 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 515 kg
Payload
449 - 526 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Power HP
190 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Power kW
140 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Audi
Brand
Skoda
Is the Audi Q4 e-tron offered with different drivetrains?

The Audi Q4 e-tron is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.