VS

Mercedes EQA vs Renault Clio comparison

Compare performance (292 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (44,200 £ vs 17,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQA or Renault Clio?

Mercedes EQA vs Renault Clio: Key differences

Mercedes EQA

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally more trunk space

Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • considerably lighter

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EQA

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Renault Clio is substantially cheaper – starting at 17,100 £ , while the Mercedes EQA costs 44,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 27,180 £.

Clio

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQA offers significantly more power – delivering 292 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 134 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQA is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 6 s, while the Renault Clio takes 8.3 s. That’s about 2.3 s quicker.

Looking at top speed, the Renault Clio is somewhat faster – reaching 180 km/h, while the Mercedes EQA tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQA delivers substantially more torque with 520 Nm compared to 190 Nm. That’s about 330 Nm more.

EQA

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Clio is considerably lighter – 1,202 kg compared to 2,045 kg. The difference is around 843 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQA offers marginally more boot space – 340 L compared to 327 L. That’s a difference of about 13 L.

For maximum load capacity, the Mercedes EQA offers somewhat more capacity – up to 1,320 L, about 144 L more than the Renault Clio.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Clio carries barely more – 463 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 38 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes EQA stands out in the key areas in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £44,200
EQA

Mercedes EQA

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 190 - 292 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 14.4 - 16.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 476 - 561 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mercedes EQA
Volvo EX40
VS
The Mercedes EQA wraps premium Mercedes poise and MBUX polish into a compact EV that feels cosseting and refined, while the Volvo EX40 trades a bit of showroom gloss for Scandi practicality, airy space and a more efficient, no‑nonsense driving character. If you want badge and cabin glamour, go EQA; …
Renault Captur
Renault Clio
VS
The Renault Captur and Renault Clio share Renault’s DNA but pursue different lifestyles: the Captur lifts you above traffic with compact-SUV presence, while the Clio stays low, nimble and city-savvy. In this quick duel we’ll compare space, economy and driving feel to help you choose between …
Mercedes EQA
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mercedes EQA

The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.

details
20C0579_017
20C0579_042
20C0579_040
20C0579_060

Reviews Mercedes EQA

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault Clio

The Clio punches above its weight with chic French styling and a surprisingly grown-up cabin that makes city driving feel effortlessly stylish. It's an easy-to-live-with choice that keeps ownership simple and even manages to put a grin on your face when the traffic gets dull.

details
r212202p
r212188p
r212211p

Reviews Renault Clio

4.7 (1 Reviews)
rate
technoman
31 Mar 2026, 08:36:27

Having owned a clio now for the last 8 years we have found the 0.9ltr engine to work well both around town and on motorways . Averaging around 45mpg on mixed driving. The 3 cylinder engine has no cambelt to worry about . Interior has worked and worn well . No defects at all during owner ship BUT the striking red paintwork (metallic) is showing deterioration and is expensive to put right and this would be the only reason for dropping a star off the rating . There are two main services on the car an A and a B service. All they do on the A service is change the cabin filter and do the usual safety checks which costa around £120 the second B service is oil and filter change around £230 but at 36000 miles need air filter and brake fluid change which can add another £120

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Hyundai i10
Renault Clio
VS
The Hyundai i10 is a pocket-sized urban pro — cheeky on fuel, effortless to park and surprisingly roomy for its class, ideal if your daily grind is dodging bollards and squeezing into parallel spaces. The Renault Clio, by contrast, plays the grown-up card with sharper styling, a nicer interior and …
Renault Clio
Toyota Yaris
VS
The Renault Clio and Toyota Yaris both stand out in the compact car segment, each offering distinct advantages for urban driving. The Clio impresses with its stylish design and exceptional fuel efficiency, appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and running costs. Meanwhile, the Yaris shines …
Renault Clio
SEAT Ibiza
VS
In the showdown between the Renault Clio and the SEAT Ibiza, both hatchbacks bring impressive credentials to the table, vying for leadership in the compact car segment. The Renault Clio continues to charm with its chic design and cutting-edge technology, providing a driving experience that balances …
Renault Clio
VW Polo
VS
In the competitive supermini segment, the Renault Clio and VW Polo stand out for their blend of style, performance, and practicality. The Clio boasts a more dynamic design and an engaging driving experience, while the Polo is celebrated for its refined build quality and advanced technology …
Mercedes EQA
VW ID.4
VS
The Mercedes EQA feels like a compact EV dressed for the boardroom — polished interior, serene ride and undeniable badge prestige, but you trade off some cabin space and a modest range for the name. The VW ID.4 is the sensible opposite: roomy, practical and better value with more usable range, …
Renault Clio
Renault R5
VS
The Clio is the sensible, all-weather hatch — efficient, tech-rich and practical for families and commuters who want a solid everyday car. The R5 is a cheeky retro reboot with electric city credentials and heaps of character — pick the Clio for logic and space, the R5 for style and smile-inducing …
Renault Clio
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the ongoing battle of compact hatchbacks, the Renault Clio and Skoda Fabia have both staked their claim for supremacy. The Clio boasts a stylish design and a reputation for comfort, often appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and innovative tech in their daily drive. Meanwhile, the Fabia …
BMW iX1
Mercedes EQA
VS
The BMW iX1 is the feisty compact EV that still drives like a BMW, with sharper handling and a practical cabin, while the Mercedes EQA prefers to charm you with a softer ride and a more polished, luxe interior. Choose the iX1 for driver engagement and better value, or the EQA if you want plush …
Mercedes EQA
Renault Clio

Costs and Consumption
Price
44,200 - 57,400 £
Price
17,100 - 23,700 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.1 - 5.1 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.4 - 16.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
476 - 561 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
70.5 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
92 - 115 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
2,045 - 2,115 kg
Curb weight
1,202 - 1,316 kg
Trunk capacity
340 L
Trunk capacity
301 - 327 L
Length
4,463 mm
Length
4,116 mm
Width
1,834 mm
Width
1,768 mm
Height
1,608 - 1,613 mm
Height
1,451 mm
Max trunk capacity
1,320 L
Max trunk capacity
1,094 - 1,176 L
Payload
425 kg
Payload
453 - 463 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
190 - 292 HP
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6 - 8.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.1 s
Max Speed
160 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
385 - 520 Nm
Torque
190 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
140 - 215 kW
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Renault
Is the Mercedes EQA offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.