VS

Mercedes EQA vs Volvo XC40 comparison

Compare performance (228 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (45,900 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQA or Volvo XC40?

Mercedes EQA vs Volvo XC40: Key differences

Mercedes EQA

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • somewhat more power
details

Volvo XC40

4.9 (8 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly cheaper
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

EQA

Electric Elegance Meets Scandinavian Power: Mercedes EQA vs. Volvo XC40

In the ever-evolving landscape of luxury compact SUVs, the Mercedes EQA and Volvo XC40 stand as compelling representations of electric elegance and Scandinavian power, respectively. Both vehicles encapsulate their brand's identity while offering unique innovations and technical aspects that appeal to discerning car enthusiasts. Let's delve into a detailed comparison of these two remarkable automobiles.

XC40

Performance and Power

The Mercedes EQA impresses with its fully electric capabilities, featuring options with various power outputs: 190 HP, 228 HP, and a thrilling 292 HP. Offering both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations, this SUV reaches from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 6 seconds, showcasing the agile performance expected from Mercedes-Benz. In contrast, the Volvo XC40, equipped with a 1969 cm3 petrol mild hybrid engine, offers power outputs of 163 HP and 197 HP. Its acceleration figures are competitive, going from 0 to 100 km/h in 7.6 seconds, emphasizing a smooth and resilient ride courtesy of its dual-clutch automatic transmission.

EQA

Efficiency and Range

As an electric vehicle, the Mercedes EQA leads in efficiency with a consumption range of 14.4 to 16.9 kWh per 100 km, providing a generous electric range between 458 km and 561 km depending on the model. The battery capacities are 66.5 kWh and 70.5 kWh, focusing on maximizing travel distances while minimizing environmental impact with zero CO2 emissions. On the other hand, the Volvo XC40, consuming 6.5 liters per 100 km, aligns with traditional fuel efficiencies but carries a higher CO2 emission range of 147 to 148 g/km, attributed to its petrol engine.

XC40

Innovations and Technology

The Mercedes EQA, embodying the brand's forward-thinking ethos, integrates cutting-edge technologies, including advanced driver assistance systems and a sophisticated infotainment system. Its futuristic design, coupled with a reduction gearbox, enhances the driving experience. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40, staying true to Volvo's reputation for safety and minimalistic elegance, incorporates state-of-the-art safety features and a user-friendly infotainment interface, solidifying its position as a reliable and tech-savvy vehicle.

EQA

Dimensions and Space

Dimensionally, the Volvo XC40 slightly surpasses the EQA in terms of trunk capacity, providing a more spacious 452 liters compared to the EQA's 340 liters. The EQA, measuring 4463 mm in length, offers a sleek and compact design ideal for urban environments, while the XC40, slightly shorter at 4425 mm, brings a robust yet elegant appearance to the table. Both SUVs comfortably seat five passengers, ensuring a blend of luxury and practicality.

XC40

Conclusion

When choosing between the Mercedes EQA and Volvo XC40, the decision largely depends on preferences towards electric mobility versus traditional powertrains. The EQA shines with its advanced electric efficiency and zero emissions, appealing to eco-conscious buyers, whereas the XC40 combines conventional power with modern luxury, catering to enthusiasts of petrol performance. Both models prove to be formidable players in the compact SUV market, reflecting their brands' heritage and innovation.

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX40
Volvo XC40
VS
The Volvo EX40 and Volvo XC40 put two sides of Volvo’s compact-SUV line-up head-to-head: the EX40 is a dedicated electric model focused on efficiency, range and modern tech, while the XC40 is a versatile compact SUV available with petrol, hybrid and electric options that delivers a more traditional …
Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EQA

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Volvo XC40 is very slightly cheaper – starting at 41,900 £ , while the Mercedes EQA costs 45,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,969 £.

XC40

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQA offers somewhat more power – delivering 228 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 31 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC40 is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 7.6 s, while the Mercedes EQA takes 7.7 s. That’s about 0.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQA delivers clearly more torque with 390 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 90 Nm more.

EQA

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Volvo XC40 is markedly lighter – 1,688 kg compared to 2,115 kg. The difference is around 427 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC40 carries markedly more – 532 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 107 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes EQA is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £45,900
EQA

Mercedes EQA

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 228 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 476 km
details
Mercedes EQA
Volvo XC40

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mercedes EQA

The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.

details
20C0579_017
20C0579_042
20C0579_040
20C0579_060

Reviews Mercedes EQA

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Volvo XC40

The Volvo XC40 blends Scandinavian design with practical versatility, offering a compact luxury crossover that feels composed and easy to live with. It’s refined and focused on safety with a high-quality interior, making it a smart choice for daily city driving and weekend escapes.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl

Reviews Volvo XC40

4.9 (8 Reviews)
rate
Pim de Bruijn
15 Jun 2026, 14:27:59

After many new Volvos — including a V70 and an XC90 — I've now bought a lightly used XC40 from the dealer. In every respect it was the best choice.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Trentini Paolo
7 May 2026, 13:45:44

Delivered a few days ago — a radical change after 5 VW Golfs, most recently a T‑Roc.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
S. M.
20 Apr 2026, 09:07:56

Excellent

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Karoq
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
Lexus NX
Volvo XC40
VS
The Lexus NX and Volvo XC40 are two leading compact luxury SUVs that blend premium craftsmanship with everyday practicality. The NX leans toward refined comfort and dependable hybrid tech, while the XC40 emphasizes clean Scandinavian design, clever packaging and class-leading safety—so choice …
Hyundai Tucson
Volvo XC40
VS
The Hyundai Tucson turns heads with bold styling, generous kit and wallet-friendly practicality, while the Volvo XC40 answers with crisp Scandinavian design, a cosseting cabin and a premium badge that justifies the extra euros. If you want bang-for-buck family usability and lots of equipment go …
Volvo EC40
Volvo XC40
VS
The Volvo C40 and Volvo XC40 are closely related compact Volvos that deliver strong safety, premium interiors and modern tech, but they take different routes: the C40 is a coupe‑styled, electric‑first model focused on design and emission‑free driving, while the XC40 is a more conventional SUV …
Peugeot 3008
Volvo XC40
VS
The Peugeot 3008 is the extrovert of the pair—bold styling, a quirky, techy interior and strong value that make it a fun crossover to live with, while the Volvo XC40 plays the long game with understated Scandinavian style, class-leading safety and a more premium feel. Pick the 3008 if you want …
Volvo V60
Volvo XC40
VS
The Volvo V60 is a sleek, premium estate built for refined cruising and carrying larger loads, while the Volvo XC40 is a compact SUV focused on city agility, practicality and a taller driving position. Choosing between them comes down to whether you want wagon-style space and long-distance comfort …
Honda HR-V
Volvo XC40
VS
The Honda HR-V is the clever, pragmatic compact SUV — roomy, economical and built for cost‑conscious buyers who want sensible packaging without fuss. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, feels like a grown‑up’s treat: pricier but wrapped in Scandinavian style, class‑leading safety tech and a premium cabin, …
Mercedes EQA
Volvo XC40

Costs and Consumption
Price
45,900 - 54,900 £
Price
41,900 - 46,100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
16.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
476 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,115 kg
Curb weight
1,688 kg
Trunk capacity
340 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,834 mm
Width
1,863 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
425 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
228 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
390 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
168 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Volvo
Is the Mercedes EQA offered with different drivetrains?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.