@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

@ Volvo Cars

Mercedes EQA vs Volvo XC40 – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Q: How much power does the Mercedes EQA deliver on the road?

The Mercedes EQA reaches a peak output of 292 HP, depending on the model.

Q: What are the Mercedes EQA’s WLTP consumption values in kWh/100 km?

In the WLTP cycle, the Mercedes EQA consumes around 14.40 kWh.

Q: What is the Mercedes EQA’s maximum WLTP range?

Depending on equipment, the WLTP range reaches up to 561 km.

Q: How large is the Mercedes EQA’s battery?

The Mercedes EQA comes with a 70.50 kWh battery.

Q: How many liters of cargo space does the Mercedes EQA offer?

Depending on configuration, up to 340 L fit inside.

Q: What are the dimensions of the Mercedes EQA?

Overall, the Mercedes EQA is 4463 mm long, 1834 mm wide and 1608 mm high.

Q: What drive types are available for the Volvo XC40?

The Volvo XC40 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

Q: How powerful is the Volvo XC40's engine?

Up to 197 HP of power – depending on the configuration.

Q: What is the fuel consumption of the Volvo XC40 according to the manufacturer?

Based on WLTP testing, consumption is around 6.50 L.

Two cars, one duel: Mercedes EQA meets Volvo XC40.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

scroll down

EQA @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Electric Elegance Meets Scandinavian Power: Mercedes EQA vs. Volvo XC40

In the ever-evolving landscape of luxury compact SUVs, the Mercedes EQA and Volvo XC40 stand as compelling representations of electric elegance and Scandinavian power, respectively. Both vehicles encapsulate their brand's identity while offering unique innovations and technical aspects that appeal to discerning car enthusiasts. Let's delve into a detailed comparison of these two remarkable automobiles.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Performance and Power

The Mercedes EQA impresses with its fully electric capabilities, featuring options with various power outputs: 190 HP, 228 HP, and a thrilling 292 HP. Offering both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive configurations, this SUV reaches from 0 to 100 km/h in as little as 6 seconds, showcasing the agile performance expected from Mercedes-Benz. In contrast, the Volvo XC40, equipped with a 1969 cm³ petrol mild hybrid engine, offers power outputs of 163 HP and 197 HP. Its acceleration figures are competitive, going from 0 to 100 km/h in 7.6 seconds, emphasizing a smooth and resilient ride courtesy of its dual-clutch automatic transmission.

scroll down

EQA @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Efficiency and Range

As an electric vehicle, the Mercedes EQA leads in efficiency with a consumption range of 14.4 to 16.9 kWh per 100 km, providing a generous electric range between 458 km and 561 km depending on the model. The battery capacities are 66.5 kWh and 70.5 kWh, focusing on maximizing travel distances while minimizing environmental impact with zero CO2 emissions. On the other hand, the Volvo XC40, consuming 6.5 liters per 100 km, aligns with traditional fuel efficiencies but carries a higher CO2 emission range of 147 to 148 g/km, attributed to its petrol engine.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Innovations and Technology

The Mercedes EQA, embodying the brand's forward-thinking ethos, integrates cutting-edge technologies, including advanced driver assistance systems and a sophisticated infotainment system. Its futuristic design, coupled with a reduction gearbox, enhances the driving experience. Meanwhile, the Volvo XC40, staying true to Volvo's reputation for safety and minimalistic elegance, incorporates state-of-the-art safety features and a user-friendly infotainment interface, solidifying its position as a reliable and tech-savvy vehicle.

EQA @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Dimensions and Space

Dimensionally, the Volvo XC40 slightly surpasses the EQA in terms of trunk capacity, providing a more spacious 452 liters compared to the EQA's 340 liters. The EQA, measuring 4463 mm in length, offers a sleek and compact design ideal for urban environments, while the XC40, slightly shorter at 4425 mm, brings a robust yet elegant appearance to the table. Both SUVs comfortably seat five passengers, ensuring a blend of luxury and practicality.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Conclusion

When choosing between the Mercedes EQA and Volvo XC40, the decision largely depends on preferences towards electric mobility versus traditional powertrains. The EQA shines with its advanced electric efficiency and zero emissions, appealing to eco-conscious buyers, whereas the XC40 combines conventional power with modern luxury, catering to enthusiasts of petrol performance. Both models prove to be formidable players in the compact SUV market, reflecting their brands' heritage and innovation.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EQA @ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Volvo XC40 has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the Mercedes EQA costs 44200 £. That’s a price difference of around 7475 £.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQA has a evident edge – offering 292 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 95 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQA is evident quicker – completing the sprint in 6 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.60 s. That’s about 1.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Volvo XC40 performs slightly better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Mercedes EQA tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes EQA pulls decisively stronger with 520 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 220 Nm difference.

scroll down

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Volvo XC40 is clearly perceptible lighter – 1688 kg compared to 2045 kg. The difference is around 357 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Volvo XC40 offers evident more room – 452 L compared to 340 L. That’s a difference of about 112 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Volvo XC40 performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1328 L, which is about 8 L more than the Mercedes EQA.

When it comes to payload, Volvo XC40 distinct takes the win – 532 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 107 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mercedes EQA shows itself to be wins by a narrow margin and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £44,200

@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Mercedes EQA

Price : 44200 - 57400 £
Body Type : SUV
Engine Type : Electric
Transmission : Automatic
Transmission Detail : Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP : 190 - 292 HP
Consumption kWh/100km : 14.4 - 16.9 kWh
Electric Range : 476 - 561 km
Battery Capacity : 70.50 kWh
Seats : 5
Acceleration 0-100km/h : 6 - 8.6 s
Model Year : 2024 - 2025
Max Speed : 160 km/h
Torque : 385 - 520 Nm
Doors : 5
Model : EQA
Modell : EQA 250+, EQA 350, EQA 300
CO2 Efficiency Class : A
Trim Level : AMG Line Advanced, AMG Line Advanced Plus, Electric Art Advanced Plus, Progressive, Progressive Advanced, Progressive Advanced Plus, Progressive 4MATIC, Progressive Advanced 4MATIC, AMG Line Premium, AMG Line Advanced 4MATIC, AMG Line Advanced Plus 4MATIC, AMG Line Premium 4MATIC, Electric Art Advanced Plus 4MATIC, Progressive Advanced Plus 4MATIC
Power kW : 140 - 215 kW
co2 : 0 g/km
Curb weight : 2045 - 2115 kg
Trunk capacity : 340 L
Length : 4463 mm
Width : 1834 mm
Height : 1608 - 1613 mm
Brand : Mercedes-Benz
Max trunk capacity : 1320 L
Payload : 425 kg

details

Mercedes EQA

5 (1)

The Mercedes EQA slips into the electric crossover ranks with the brand’s familiar luxury polish, offering a quiet, fuss-free drive that feels perfectly at home in the city or on a country escape. Inside it’s neatly finished and tech-forward, projecting grown-up refinement even if it plays things a bit safe for anyone chasing outright excitement.

details

@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media

Volvo XC40

5 (2)

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

details

@ Volvo Cars

@ Volvo Cars

@ Volvo Cars

265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal

@ Volvo Cars

265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl

@ Volvo Cars

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center

Ford Kuga

@ Volvo Cars

Volvo XC40

The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …

@ Nissan Motor Corporation

Nissan Qashqai

@ Volvo Cars

Volvo XC40

The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …

Mercedes EQA

Volvo XC40

@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media	@ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption
Price 44200 - 57400 £	Price 36800 - 47200 £
Consumption L/100km -	Consumption L/100km 6.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km 14.4 - 16.9 kWh	Consumption kWh/100km -
Electric Range 476 - 561 km	Electric Range -
Battery Capacity 70.50 kWh	Battery Capacity -
co2 0 g/km	co2 147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity -	Fuel tank capacity 54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type SUV	Body Type SUV
Seats 5	Seats 5
Doors 5	Doors 5
Curb weight 2045 - 2115 kg	Curb weight 1688 kg
Trunk capacity 340 L	Trunk capacity 452 L
Length 4463 mm	Length 4425 mm
Width 1834 mm	Width 1863 mm
Height 1608 - 1613 mm	Height 1652 mm
Max trunk capacity 1320 L	Max trunk capacity 1328 L
Payload 425 kg	Payload 532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type Electric	Engine Type Petrol MHEV
Transmission Automatic	Transmission Automatic
Transmission Detail Reduction Gearbox	Transmission Detail Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive	Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP 190 - 292 HP	Power HP 163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h 6 - 8.6 s	Acceleration 0-100km/h 7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed 160 km/h	Max Speed 180 km/h
Torque 385 - 520 Nm	Torque 265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders -	Number of Cylinders 4
Power kW 140 - 215 kW	Power kW 120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity -	Engine capacity 1969 cm3