Compare performance (292 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (45,900 £ vs 36,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQB or Volvo XC40?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the dynamic world of SUVs, the Mercedes EQB and Volvo XC40 stand out as notable entries. While the EQB pushes boundaries with its all-electric engineering, the XC40 remains a strong contender with its petrol mild hybrid system. Let's dive deeper into the technicalities and innovations of these two models to determine which might suit your driving needs best.
The Mercedes EQB, at a length of 4684 mm, offers a more extended profile compared to the Volvo XC40, which measures 4425 mm. Both vehicles share a similar height, with the EQB ranging from 1654 to 1689 mm while the XC40 stands at 1652 mm. When it comes to width, the EQB is slightly narrower at 1834 mm compared to the XC40's 1863 mm. The EQB's design is streamlined and aerodynamically optimized for electric efficiency, while the XC40 offers a robust stance keen on capturing the traditional SUV enthusiast.
The Mercedes EQB is equipped with an electric engine offering a power range of 190 to 292 HP, translating to 140 to 215 kW. The acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h varies between 8.9 s and 6.2 s, making it an agile performer in its class. The EQB offers both front-wheel drive and all-wheel drive options, with a maximum speed capped at 160 km/h.
On the other hand, the Volvo XC40 runs on a petrol mild hybrid engine, delivering between 163 and 197 HP and power outputs of 120 to 145 kW. With a slightly faster acceleration performance ranging from 8.6 s to 7.6 s, the XC40 eclipses its electric rival in this respect. Its maximum speed hits 180 km/h, reflecting its more traditional drive dynamics.
As an electric model, the EQB shines with its extensive range, offering between 445 km to 533 km on a full battery, underlining its commitment to sustainable mobility. With consumption rates of 15.2 to 17.3 kWh/100 km and zero CO2 emissions, the EQB sets a high standard in electric efficiency. Furthermore, it boasts a significant trunk capacity of 495 L.
The XC40, being a petrol mild hybrid, records consumption at 6.5 L/100 km and emits between 147 and 148 g/km of CO2. While not as clean as the EQB, the XC40's emissions and energy usage reflect a more traditional ecological footprint. Its trunk offers 452 L of space, making it a practical choice for everyday utility.
The Mercedes EQB and Volvo XC40 both present compelling cases for potential SUV buyers. The EQB's all-electric prowess, with its impressive range and zero emissions, appeals to those seeking sustainability and innovation. Meanwhile, the XC40's hybrid engine offers familiarity and slightly enhanced driving dynamics.
In the end, the decision may boil down to personal preferences: go for the EQB if you're prepared to embrace the electric future, or opt for the XC40 if you value the tried-and-tested attributes of a petrol hybrid. Either way, both models exemplify their brands' commitments to advanced technology and cutting-edge design.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Volvo XC40 is clearly cheaper – starting at 36,800 £ , while the Mercedes EQB costs 45,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,107 £.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQB offers visibly more power – delivering 292 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 95 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQB is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.2 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.6 s. That’s about 1.4 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the Volvo XC40 is somewhat faster – reaching 180 km/h, while the Mercedes EQB tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQB delivers substantially more torque with 520 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 220 Nm more.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Volvo XC40 is clearly lighter – 1,688 kg compared to 2,105 kg. The difference is around 417 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQB offers marginally more boot space – 495 L compared to 452 L. That’s a difference of about 43 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Mercedes EQB offers visibly more capacity – up to 1,710 L, about 382 L more than the Volvo XC40.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC40 carries a bit more – 532 kg compared to 435 kg. That’s a difference of about 97 kg.
The Mercedes EQB is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mercedes EQB is an electric compact SUV that dresses Mercedes' premium feel in practical clothing, with flexible seating and a serene, composed ride that turns everyday errands into a small luxury. It won't thrill the enthusiast, but for buyers who want a smart, spacious and well-made EV with tasteful tech and real-world usability, the EQB is a sensible, slightly buttoned-up choice that impresses without shouting.
details
The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
45,900 - 58,900 £
|
Price
36,800 - 47,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
6.5 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.2 - 17.2 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
468 - 535 km
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
70.5 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
147 - 148 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
54 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2,105 - 2,170 kg
|
Curb weight
1,688 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
495 L
|
Trunk capacity
452 L
|
|
Length
4,684 mm
|
Length
4,425 mm
|
|
Width
1,834 mm
|
Width
1,863 mm
|
|
Height
1,654 - 1,689 mm
|
Height
1,652 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,710 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,328 L
|
|
Payload
435 kg
|
Payload
532 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
190 - 292 HP
|
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.2 - 8.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
385 - 520 Nm
|
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
140 - 215 kW
|
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España