@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
@ Volvo Cars
VS

Skoda Kodiaq vs Volvo XC40 – Which car suits you better?

Two cars, one duel: Skoda Kodiaq meets Volvo XC40.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

A Clash of Contemporary Titans: Skoda Kodiaq vs. Volvo XC40

In modern automotive design, the SUV has emerged as the quintessential choice for drivers seeking versatility and style. Two standout competitors in this arena are the Skoda Kodiaq and the Volvo XC40. Both these vehicles offer unique features that cater to diverse automotive needs. Let us delve into their technical prowess and innovations to discern which SUV might just be your next ride.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Design and Dimensions

The Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC40 both embody the SUV ethos with their robust designs. The Kodiaq measures a respectable length of up to 4761 mm, width of 1864 mm, and height of up to 1683 mm, showcasing its spacious interior. On the other hand, the Volvo XC40 embodies a more compact design, with a length of 4425 mm, width of 1863 mm, and height of 1652 mm, offering a modern, city-friendly appearance.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Power and Performance

The Skoda Kodiaq offers a range of power options, with the most potent engine delivering up to 265 HP and a top speed of 231 km/h. It also boasts a 0-100km/h acceleration time of 6.3 seconds, making it a force to be reckoned with in the SUV market. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 provides a maximum power output of 197 HP, achieving its top speed at 180 km/h. Its acceleration is also commendable, with a 0-100km/h time of 7.6 seconds.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Efficiency and Sustainability

Fuel efficiency is critical, with the Kodiaq's standout fuel consumption as low as 0.4 L/100km, compliments of its plugin hybrid variant, boasting an electric range of up to 123 km. The XC40 offers a more straightforward approach with a consistent consumption of 6.5 L/100km. Despite this, both vehicles maintain a balance between power and eco-friendliness with commendable CO2 efficiency classes.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Interior Space and Comfort

When it comes to interior space, the Kodiaq shines with a trunk capacity of up to 910 liters, providing ample room for luggage, ideal for family adventures. Meanwhile, the XC40, with a trunk capacity of 452 liters, prioritizes compact efficiency and maneuverability hence more suitable for urban settings.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Innovation and Technology

Technological innovation is prominent in both models. The Skoda Kodiaq impresses with a range of engine options including a plugin hybrid variant, appealing to the eco-conscious driver. The Volvo XC40, while more traditional in its engine offerings, combines Volvo's legacy of safety with modern tech, ensuring a secure and connected ride.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Final Verdict

Choosing between the Skoda Kodiaq and the Volvo XC40 boils down to individual preferences. The Kodiaq excels in offering a wide array of powertrains, impressive cargo space, and exceptional fuel efficiency, making it ideal for those who need space and sustainability. The Volvo XC40, with its stylish compact design and renowned safety features, caters to those seeking a premium city SUV experience.

Ultimately, your decision may rest on your specific needs—whether they're rooted in adventure, efficiency, or urban prowess. Whichever you choose, both the Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC40 offer impressive contributions to the SUV landscape.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Volvo XC40 has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 36800 £, while the Skoda Kodiaq costs 36800 £. That’s a price difference of around 86 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Skoda Kodiaq manages with 0.40 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.50 L. The difference is about 6.10 L per 100 km.

Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq has a noticeable edge – offering 265 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 6.30 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.60 s. That’s about 1.30 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Kodiaq performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 231 km/h, while the Volvo XC40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 51 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Kodiaq pulls noticeable stronger with 400 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm difference.

XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is minimal lighter – 1684 kg compared to 1688 kg. The difference is around 4 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers convincingly more room – 910 L compared to 452 L. That’s a difference of about 458 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Kodiaq performs distinct better – up to 2105 L, which is about 777 L more than the Volvo XC40.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Kodiaq minimal takes the win – 563 kg compared to 532 kg. That’s a difference of about 31 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Skoda Kodiaq shows itself to be is largely superior and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £36,800
Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 0.4 - 8.2 L
  • Electric Range : 113 - 123 km
details

Skoda Kodiaq

5 (1)
rate

The Skoda Kodiaq blends sensible practicality with surprising style, so families and weekend adventurers get roomy comfort without looking like a moving van. It feels calm and composed on the road, packs clever storage and user-friendly tech, and manages to deliver a near-premium vibe without the pretension.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KODIAQ_45646 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984 @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard

Volvo XC40

5 (2)
rate

The Volvo XC40 wraps Scandinavian minimalism into a compact, city-ready SUV with a premium cabin that feels both practical and grown-up. It will suit buyers who prize safety, clever storage and a composed ride, proving that small dimensions don't mean small personality.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior @ Volvo Cars
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal @ Volvo Cars
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl @ Volvo Cars

Top Car Comparisons

@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Kuga
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
@ Nissan Motor Corporation
Nissan Qashqai
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC40
Kodiaq @ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
XC40 @ Volvo Cars

Costs and Consumption
Price
36800 - 49600 £
Price
36800 - 47200 £
Consumption L/100km
0.4 - 8.2 L
Consumption L/100km
6.50 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
113 - 123 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
19.70 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
9 - 186 g/km
co2
147 - 148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
45 - 58 L
Fuel tank capacity
54 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1684 - 1970 kg
Curb weight
1688 kg
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Trunk capacity
452 L
Length
4758 - 4761 mm
Length
4425 mm
Width
1864 mm
Width
1863 mm
Height
1663 - 1683 mm
Height
1652 mm
Max trunk capacity
1945 - 2105 L
Max trunk capacity
1328 L
Payload
460 - 563 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
205 - 231 km/h
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
1498 - 1984 cm3
Engine capacity
1969 cm3

General
Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, F, G, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Volvo

Similar Comparisons

@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
@ Dacia / Renault Group Media
Dacia Bigster
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the sensible grown-up: roomy, cleverly packaged and quietly refined for family life, while the Dacia Bigster bangs the value drum — massive interior and tough price tag, but fewer niceties. Choose the Kodiaq for long-term polish and smarter detailing; pick the Bigster if you …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW T-Roc
VS
The Volvo XC40 feels like a Scandinavian apartment on wheels — impeccably built, comfort-first and loaded with safety tech that soothes motorway miles. The VW T‑Roc, by contrast, is the cheeky, value-packed alternative with sharper handling and livelier infotainment, perfect if you want more …
@ Mercedes-Benz Group Media
Mercedes GLB
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mercedes GLB dresses up compact practicality in a premium suit, with crisp tech and city-friendly manners, while the Skoda Kodiaq goes full-on family hauler, offering cavernous space and sensible value. Choose the GLB for style and badge appeal; pick the Kodiaq if you need seats, luggage and a …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense family hauler: cavernous boot, clever storage, and a sensible price that makes sense when you’ve got kids and a budget. The VW Tayron trades some of that practicality for sharper looks, a firmer ride and smarter tech — pick it if you want a touch more polish and …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Karoq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC90
VS
In the realm of family SUVs, the Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC90 stand as formidable contenders. The Skoda Kodiaq entices with its impressive practicality, value for money, and versatile seven-seat configuration, making it an appealing choice for budget-conscious families. On the other hand, the Volvo …
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo EX40
@ Volvo Cars
Volvo XC40
VS
Choosing between the Volvo EX40 and XC40 is basically a choice between new‑school electric chic and old‑school SUV versatility: the EX40 is the fresh, all‑electric, city‑savvy compact with the latest tech and low running costs, while the XC40 is the tougher, more familiar compact that still offers …
@ CUPRA / SEAT S.A.
CUPRA Terramar
@ Škoda Auto a.s. / Škoda Storyboard
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The CUPRA Terramar is the sharper, sportier contender with taut handling and a premium design that puts fun at the top of the shopping list. By contrast, the Skoda Kodiaq plays the sensible family card — cavernous interior, clever storage and everyday practicality — making it the smarter buy if you …
What drive types are available for the Skoda Kodiaq?

The Skoda Kodiaq is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.