VS

Skoda Kodiaq vs Volvo XC40 comparison

Compare performance (265 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (37,900 £ vs 41,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Skoda Kodiaq or Volvo XC40?

Skoda Kodiaq vs Volvo XC40: Key differences

Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately cheaper
  • markedly more power
  • significantly more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter
details

Volvo XC40

5 (6 Reviews)
rate
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Kodiaq

A Clash of Contemporary Titans: Skoda Kodiaq vs. Volvo XC40

In modern automotive design, the SUV has emerged as the quintessential choice for drivers seeking versatility and style. Two standout competitors in this arena are the Skoda Kodiaq and the Volvo XC40. Both these vehicles offer unique features that cater to diverse automotive needs. Let us delve into their technical prowess and innovations to discern which SUV might just be your next ride.

XC40

Design and Dimensions

The Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC40 both embody the SUV ethos with their robust designs. The Kodiaq measures a respectable length of up to 4761 mm, width of 1864 mm, and height of up to 1683 mm, showcasing its spacious interior. On the other hand, the Volvo XC40 embodies a more compact design, with a length of 4425 mm, width of 1863 mm, and height of 1652 mm, offering a modern, city-friendly appearance.

Kodiaq

Power and Performance

The Skoda Kodiaq offers a range of power options, with the most potent engine delivering up to 265 HP and a top speed of 231 km/h. It also boasts a 0-100km/h acceleration time of 6.3 seconds, making it a force to be reckoned with in the SUV market. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 provides a maximum power output of 197 HP, achieving its top speed at 180 km/h. Its acceleration is also commendable, with a 0-100km/h time of 7.6 seconds.

XC40

Efficiency and Sustainability

Fuel efficiency is critical, with the Kodiaq's standout fuel consumption as low as 0.4 L/100km, compliments of its plugin hybrid variant, boasting an electric range of up to 123 km. The XC40 offers a more straightforward approach with a consistent consumption of 6.5 L/100km. Despite this, both vehicles maintain a balance between power and eco-friendliness with commendable CO2 efficiency classes.

Kodiaq

Interior Space and Comfort

When it comes to interior space, the Kodiaq shines with a trunk capacity of up to 910 liters, providing ample room for luggage, ideal for family adventures. Meanwhile, the XC40, with a trunk capacity of 452 liters, prioritizes compact efficiency and maneuverability hence more suitable for urban settings.

XC40

Innovation and Technology

Technological innovation is prominent in both models. The Skoda Kodiaq impresses with a range of engine options including a plugin hybrid variant, appealing to the eco-conscious driver. The Volvo XC40, while more traditional in its engine offerings, combines Volvo's legacy of safety with modern tech, ensuring a secure and connected ride.

Kodiaq

Final Verdict

Choosing between the Skoda Kodiaq and the Volvo XC40 boils down to individual preferences. The Kodiaq excels in offering a wide array of powertrains, impressive cargo space, and exceptional fuel efficiency, making it ideal for those who need space and sustainability. The Volvo XC40, with its stylish compact design and renowned safety features, caters to those seeking a premium city SUV experience.

Ultimately, your decision may rest on your specific needs—whether they're rooted in adventure, efficiency, or urban prowess. Whichever you choose, both the Skoda Kodiaq and Volvo XC40 offer impressive contributions to the SUV landscape.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq and VW Tayron are closely related midsize SUVs that focus on practicality and solid build quality, but they appeal to slightly different tastes and priorities. This quick comparison will help you decide whether the Kodiaq’s family-friendly versatility or the Tayron’s more …
Nissan Qashqai
Volvo XC40
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, hard-working compact SUV that delivers excellent everyday comfort, clever interior space and strong value for money — perfect if you want a reliable family car without the premium price tag. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, is a sharper, more upscale choice with a …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Kodiaq

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Skoda Kodiaq is moderately cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the Volvo XC40 costs 41,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,028 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is significantly more efficient than the Volvo XC40 with 6.5 L/100km. The difference is about 5 L/100km.

XC40

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Kodiaq offers markedly more power – delivering 265 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 68 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the Volvo XC40 takes 7.6 s. That’s about 1.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kodiaq delivers markedly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 300 Nm. That’s about 100 Nm more.

Kodiaq

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is barely lighter – 1,684 kg compared to 1,688 kg. The difference is around 4 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries very slightly more – 563 kg compared to 532 kg. That’s a difference of about 31 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,900
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 119 - 122 km
details
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC40

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq is a practical, well built family SUV that puts space, comfort and usefulness ahead of showy gimmicks. Its composed ride, clever interior packaging and sensible feature set make it an easy, unpretentious choice for daily driving and longer journeys.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Geert
5 May 2026, 08:49:23

The Skoda Kodiac looks sleeker and is bigger. The Ford Explorer is a bit smaller and there was such a fuss made about it, but it’s disappointing in looks and even worse on the inside.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
zlatko P.
10 Feb 2026, 10:37:54

more for money, pracical

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Volvo XC40

The Volvo XC40 blends Scandinavian design with practical versatility, offering a compact luxury crossover that feels composed and easy to live with. It’s refined and focused on safety with a high-quality interior, making it a smart choice for daily city driving and weekend escapes.

details
223202_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
223206_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
223200_XC40_Inscription_-_exterior
265601_XC40_Recharge_Plug-In_Hybrid_R-Design_Leather_Charcoal_in_Charcoal
265600_XC40_AWD_R-Design_expression_in_Crystal_White_Pearl

Reviews Volvo XC40

5 (6 Reviews)
rate
Trentini Paolo
7 May 2026, 13:45:44

Delivered a few days ago — a radical change after 5 VW Golfs, most recently a T‑Roc.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
S. M.
20 Apr 2026, 09:07:56

Excellent

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Volvo XC40
VS
The Ford Kuga is the zippier, more practical pick — roomy, better value and a bit more fun to drive — while the Volvo XC40 trades that scrappiness for a quieter, upmarket cabin, class-leading safety tech and unmistakable Scandinavian polish. If you want driving engagement and bang for your buck go …
Hyundai Tucson
Volvo XC40
VS
The Hyundai Tucson turns heads with bold styling, generous kit and wallet-friendly practicality, while the Volvo XC40 answers with crisp Scandinavian design, a cosseting cabin and a premium badge that justifies the extra euros. If you want bang-for-buck family usability and lots of equipment go …
Volvo EX40
Volvo XC40
VS
The Volvo EX40 and Volvo XC40 put two sides of Volvo’s compact-SUV line-up head-to-head: the EX40 is a dedicated electric model focused on efficiency, range and modern tech, while the XC40 is a versatile compact SUV available with petrol, hybrid and electric options that delivers a more traditional …
Volvo EC40
Volvo XC40
VS
The Volvo C40 and Volvo XC40 are closely related compact Volvos that deliver strong safety, premium interiors and modern tech, but they take different routes: the C40 is a coupe‑styled, electric‑first model focused on design and emission‑free driving, while the XC40 is a more conventional SUV …
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota RAV4
VS
If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …
Skoda Karoq
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq is the sensible, spacious family SUV that puts practicality and value first — roomy boot, low running costs and a no-nonsense interior that feels built to last. The Volvo XC40, by contrast, serves up Scandi style, sharper tech and a more premium cabin (plus safety kit you can brag …
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Skoda Enyaq is the slick, silent EV that turns everyday driving into a techy, whisper-quiet commute, while the Skoda Kodiaq remains the go-anywhere, seven-seat family SUV that swallows luggage and trailers without complaint. Choose the Enyaq for lower running costs, a modern cabin and …
Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Hyundai Tucson and Skoda Kodiaq pit a stylish, tech-packed compact crossover against a larger, family-focused SUV with up to seven seats. I’ll compare space, comfort, driving character and running costs so you can decide which suits your needs.
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC40

Costs and Consumption
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Price
41,900 - 46,100 £
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
35 - 186 g/km
co2
148 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Curb weight
1,688 kg
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,864 mm
Width
1,863 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
460 - 563 kg
Payload
532 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Power HP
163 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.6 - 8.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Torque
265 - 300 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Power kW
120 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
Brand
Skoda
Brand
Volvo
What drivetrain options does the Skoda Kodiaq have?

The Skoda Kodiaq is available as All-Wheel Drive or Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.