VS

Mercedes EQE SUV vs MG ZS comparison

Compare performance (625 HP vs 197 HP), boot space and price (71,600 £ vs 18,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQE SUV or MG ZS?

Mercedes EQE SUV vs MG ZS: Key differences

Mercedes EQE SUV

4.8 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • significantly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EQE SUV

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

MG ZS is significantly cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Mercedes EQE SUV costs 71,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 53,562 £.

ZS

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQE SUV offers clearly more power – delivering 625 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 428 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQE SUV is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 3.7 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.7 s. That’s about 5 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQE SUV delivers clearly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 802 Nm more.

EQE SUV

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is significantly lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 2,440 kg. The difference is around 1,110 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mercedes EQE SUV offers somewhat more boot space – 520 L compared to 443 L. That’s a difference of about 77 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQE SUV carries moderately more – 580 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 110 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes EQE SUV holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £71,600
EQE SUV

Mercedes EQE SUV

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 265 - 625 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 18.3 - 23.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 453 - 611 km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
MG ZS
Nissan Juke
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Nissan Juke pits a practical, value-oriented small SUV (the MG ZS) against a more stylised, compact crossover with sharper driving character (the Nissan Juke). This quick guide highlights how they differ in space, equipment, engines and running costs so you can pick the …
Mercedes EQE SUV
MG ZS

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mercedes EQE SUV

The Mercedes EQE SUV wraps silent electric power in a sumptuous, tech-filled shell, offering a cocoon-like cabin that makes long journeys feel indulgent. It’s not a driver's toy but a sophisticated cruiser for buyers who want luxury, space and futuristic gadgetry without shouting for attention.

details
22C0288_002
22C0288_003
22C0288_005
22C0288_036

Reviews Mercedes EQE SUV

4.8 (3 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

MG ZS

The MG ZS is a compact crossover that delivers strong value with a roomy cabin and straightforward tech, making it a sensible choice for budget-minded buyers. It’s easy to live with, offering comfortable rides and a practical layout that suits daily commutes and family errands.

details
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-07
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-21
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-luxury_interior
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-16

Reviews MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
Constantin
9 Jun 2026, 22:34:01

I replaced my Dacia Jogger with an MG ZS Hybrid and I don't regret it.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ahmed
30 Sept 2025, 14:05:11

With all the features it offers at that price, the MG has no competition. A BMW X1 of similar dimensions with a few extra upgrades costs more than twice as much, and considering that 40% of MG’s spare parts come from Germany (Bosch, Continental, etc.), I’d go for the MG ZS Hybrid without a second thought.

Frequently compared as well

MG MG3
MG ZS
VS
Choosing between the compact MG3 hatchback and the larger MG ZS crossover comes down to whether you prioritise city-friendly agility and low running costs or interior space and practicality. This comparison covers driving character, equipment, fuel economy and ownership costs to help you pick the …
MG ZS
Renault Captur
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Captur brings together two popular small SUVs aimed at buyers who want practicality, low running costs and modern equipment. I’ll cut through the marketing to show how they differ in space, comfort, driving feel, technology and running costs so you can choose the one …
MG ZS
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The MG ZS and the Toyota Yaris Cross are two popular compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV styling without big running costs. The ZS undercuts with strong equipment and roomy cabin for the money, while the Yaris Cross prioritises refinement, hybrid efficiency and Toyota’s proven …
Ford Puma
MG ZS
VS
Choosing between the Ford Puma and the MG ZS comes down to whether you prioritise driving dynamics and refinement or space and value. The Puma is a compact, agile crossover with sharper handling, a more upmarket cabin and peppy engines, while the MG ZS trades sportiness for generous interior space, …
MG ZS
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …
Citroen C3 Aircross
MG ZS
VS
Choosing between the Citroën C3 Aircross and the MG ZS comes down to whether you want a quirky, comfort-focused small SUV with clever interior packaging or a straightforward, value-driven package with strong equipment levels. I’ll compare their ride, interior space, efficiency, safety tech and …
Dacia Duster
MG ZS
VS
The Dacia Duster and MG ZS are two practical, budget-friendly compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want more space and a higher driving position without premium prices. This comparison will help you decide whether the Duster’s rugged simplicity and low running costs or the ZS’s sharper styling and …
Kia Sportage
MG ZS
VS
The Kia Sportage and MG ZS are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want practical, everyday family transport—each offers a different mix of comfort, technology and value. This quick comparison shows how the Sportage’s more refined ride and stronger engine choices compare with the ZS’s budget-friendly …
Mercedes EQE SUV
MG ZS

Costs and Consumption
Price
71,600 - 125,100 £
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 - 23.1 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
453 - 611 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
90.5 - 96 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
115 - 145 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
4
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,440 - 2,615 kg
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
Trunk capacity
520 L
Trunk capacity
443 L
Length
4,863 - 4,879 mm
Length
-
Width
1,940 mm
Width
1,818 mm
Height
1,672 - 1,685 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,675 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
505 - 580 kg
Payload
375 - 470 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
265 - 625 HP
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.7 - 7.1 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Max Speed
210 - 240 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
550 - 950 Nm
Torque
148 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
195 - 460 kW
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
MG
What drivetrain options does the Mercedes EQE SUV have?

The Mercedes EQE SUV is available as All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.