VS

Mercedes EQE vs Mazda CX-6e comparison

Compare performance (625 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (57600 £ vs 42800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQE or Mazda CX-6e?

Mercedes EQE vs Mazda CX-6e: Key differences

Mercedes EQE

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • decisively more power
  • a bit more efficient
  • noticeable more electric range
  • decisively quicker from 0–100 km/h

Mazda CX-6e

  • clearly perceptible cheaper
  • minimal lighter
  • minimal more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EQE

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Mazda CX-6e has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 42800 £ , while the Mercedes EQE costs 57600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14740 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Mercedes EQE: with 15.80 kWh per 100 km, it’s a bit more efficient than the Mazda CX-6e with 18.90 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.10 kWh.

As for electric range, the Mercedes EQE performs noticeable better – achieving up to 691 km, about 207 km more than the Mazda CX-6e.

CX-6e

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQE has a decisively edge – offering 625 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 367 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQE is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 3.50 s, while the Mazda CX-6e takes 7.90 s. That’s about 4.40 s faster.

There’s also a difference in torque: Mercedes EQE pulls convincingly stronger with 950 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 660 Nm difference.

EQE

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mazda CX-6e is minimal lighter – 2205 kg compared to 2375 kg. The difference is around 170 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mazda CX-6e offers minimal more room – 468 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 38 L.

When it comes to payload, Mercedes EQE distinct takes the win – 600 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 215 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes EQE sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Mercedes EQE
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis
from about £57,600
EQE

Mercedes EQE

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 265 - 625 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 15.8 - 20.7 kWh
  • Electric Range : 502 - 691 km

Mercedes EQE

4.3 (2 Reviews)
rate

The Mercedes EQE glides like a silk-wrapped saloon from the future, pairing whisper-quiet refinement with a high-tech cabin that feels both modern and indulgent. For buyers who want electric luxury without shouting about it, the EQE is composed, comfortably confident, and just smug enough to feel special.

details

Mazda CX-6e

The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.

details
Mercedes EQE
Mazda CX-6e

Costs and Consumption

Price
57600 - 94900 £
Price
42800 - 45400 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 20.7 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh
Electric Range
502 - 691 km
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
Battery Capacity
90.5 - 96 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Sedan
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
4
Doors
-
Curb weight
2375 - 2540 kg
Curb weight
2205 kg
Trunk capacity
430 L
Trunk capacity
468 L
Length
4946 - 4964 mm
Length
-
Width
1961 mm
Width
1935 mm
Height
1492 - 1510 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
545 - 600 kg
Payload
385 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
Power HP
265 - 625 HP
Power HP
258 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.5 - 6.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.90 s
Max Speed
210 - 220 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
550 - 950 Nm
Torque
290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
195 - 460 kW
Power kW
190 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General

Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Mazda
What drive types are available for the Mercedes EQE?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.