Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mercedes EQE vs Mazda CX-6e comparison
Compare performance (625 HP vs 258 HP), boot space and price (57,600 £ vs 42,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQE or Mazda CX-6e?
Mercedes EQE vs Mazda CX-6e: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
EQE
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Mazda CX-6e is visibly cheaper – starting at 42,800 £ , while the Mercedes EQE costs 57,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,740 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Mercedes EQE is somewhat more efficient: consuming 15.8 kWh/100km compared to 18.9 kWh/100km for the Mazda CX-6e. That’s a difference of about 3.1 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes EQE offers markedly more range – reaching up to 691 km, about 207 km more than the Mazda CX-6e.
CX-6e
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQE offers substantially more power – delivering 625 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 367 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQE is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.5 s, while the Mazda CX-6e takes 7.9 s. That’s about 4.4 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQE delivers clearly more torque with 950 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 660 Nm more.
EQE
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-6e is marginally lighter – 2,205 kg compared to 2,375 kg. The difference is around 170 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-6e offers only slightly more boot space – 468 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 38 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQE carries markedly more – 600 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 215 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mercedes EQE is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £57,600
Mercedes EQE
Mercedes EQE
Mazda CX-6e
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mercedes EQE
The Mercedes EQE glides like a silk-wrapped saloon from the future, pairing whisper-quiet refinement with a high-tech cabin that feels both modern and indulgent. For buyers who want electric luxury without shouting about it, the EQE is composed, comfortably confident, and just smug enough to feel special.
details
Mazda CX-6e
The Mazda CX-6e blends Mazda’s flowing coupe‑SUV silhouette with electric propulsion to deliver a surprisingly engaging and polished driving experience that feels more premium than its price suggests. Inside, the cabin is quietly refined and ergonomically smart, with modern tech and practical space that make it a stylish, sensible choice for drivers who want EV manners without the fanfare.
details
Mercedes EQE
Mazda CX-6e
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
57,600 - 94,900 £
|
Price
42,800 - 45,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 20.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.9 - 19.4 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
502 - 691 km
|
Electric Range
468 - 484 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
90.5 - 96 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,375 - 2,540 kg
|
Curb weight
2,205 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
430 L
|
Trunk capacity
468 L
|
|
Length
4,946 - 4,964 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,961 mm
|
Width
1,935 mm
|
|
Height
1,492 - 1,510 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
545 - 600 kg
|
Payload
385 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
265 - 625 HP
|
Power HP
258 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.5 - 6.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
210 - 220 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
550 - 950 Nm
|
Torque
290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
195 - 460 kW
|
Power kW
190 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Mazda
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.