VS

Mercedes EQS SUV vs Renault Arkana comparison

Compare performance (658 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (95,000 £ vs 28,500 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQS SUV or Renault Arkana?

Mercedes EQS SUV vs Renault Arkana: Key differences

Mercedes EQS SUV

  • considerably more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • significantly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EQS SUV

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Renault Arkana is considerably cheaper – starting at 28,500 £ , while the Mercedes EQS SUV costs 95,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 66,515 £.

Arkana

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQS SUV offers considerably more power – delivering 658 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 515 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQS SUV is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 4.4 s, while the Renault Arkana takes 10.8 s. That’s about 6.4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQS SUV delivers substantially more torque with 950 Nm compared to 205 Nm. That’s about 745 Nm more.

EQS SUV

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Renault Arkana is significantly lighter – 1,510 kg compared to 2,695 kg. The difference is around 1,185 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQS SUV carries markedly more – 570 kg compared to 451 kg. That’s a difference of about 119 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes EQS SUV holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £95,000
EQS SUV

Mercedes EQS SUV

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 360 - 658 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 19.6 - 21.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 615 - 695 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Symbioz
VS
The Renault Arkana is the compact, coupe‑SUV you can buy today — affordable, practical and mildly athletic, with hybrid options that make it a sensible family car rather than a fashion statement. The Renault Symbioz, by contrast, is Renault’s sci‑fi manifesto: an electric, autonomous concept …
Renault Arkana
Renault Rafale
VS
The Renault Arkana and Renault Rafale represent two different takes on Renault's crossover line-up: the Arkana is a compact, value-focused coupe-SUV, while the Rafale aims higher as a larger, more premium fastback crossover packed with technology. This comparison strips away the marketing to help …
Mercedes EQS SUV
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mercedes EQS SUV

The Mercedes EQS SUV blends limousine-level quiet and luxury with the commanding presence of an SUV, wrapping passengers in sumptuous materials and a futuristic, screen-dominated cabin. It drives with serene confidence and delivers the kind of effortless refinement that makes city commutes and long trips feel like first-class experiences — just be prepared for attention wherever you park it.

details
22C0307_016
22C0307_013
22C0307_035
22C0307_044

Reviews Mercedes EQS SUV

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Renault Arkana

The Renault Arkana turns heads with its coupe-like roofline and SUV practicality, offering stylish presence without pretending to be a supercar. It feels composed and economical on everyday roads, making it a savvy choice for buyers who want flair and sensible running costs with a wink rather than a roar.

details
r210653p
r210654p
r210665p
r210657p
r210613p
r210616p

Reviews Renault Arkana

4 (7 Reviews)
rate
Sonja
8 Apr 2026, 14:14:58

We've been driving the Arkana RS Line mild-hybrid for almost five years — and we're mega satisfied. At first everyone turned to stare. It's a good car to cover motorway miles, and fuel consumption of about 6.4 l/100 km is acceptable. Since our contract is ending, we're parting with the Arkana despite the lovely years together and switching to the Symbioz full-hybrid 160 Alpine Line. Hopefully we'll have a great time with it too.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Cesare
29 Jan 2026, 09:29:59

An excellent compromise between styling, practicality, space and fuel consumption. It’s not a sporty coupe, but practical for everyday use, with balanced purchase and running costs.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Hans Persson
19 Sept 2025, 16:05:49

An almost fully equipped car that's economical and stylish.

Frequently compared as well

Renault Arkana
Renault Austral
VS
In the competitive compact SUV market, the Renault Arkana and Renault Austral offer distinct advantages that cater to different buyer preferences. While the Arkana stands out with its sporty coupe-like design and agile handling, the Austral impresses with a more traditional SUV layout and spacious …
Renault Arkana
Renault Captur
VS
Comparing the Renault Arkana and the Renault Captur, both models present unique offerings in the compact SUV category. The Arkana stands out with its coupe-inspired design, providing a sportier profile and an engaging driving experience, ideal for those seeking an adventurous edge. In contrast, the …
Mercedes GLC
Mercedes EQS SUV
VS
Mercedes GLC and Mercedes EQS SUV go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Ford Kuga
Renault Arkana
VS
In the competitive crossover SUV segment, the Ford Kuga and Renault Arkana present two distinct approaches to style and capability. The Ford Kuga impresses with its versatile engine options and spacious interior, making it an ideal choice for family-oriented buyers. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana …
Mercedes EQS SUV
Volvo EX90
VS
In the realm of luxury electric SUVs, the Mercedes EQS SUV and the Volvo EX90 both emerge as formidable contenders, each with unique strengths. The Mercedes EQS SUV dazzles with its opulent interior and innovative MBUX Hyperscreen, offering unparalleled comfort and technological advancement for …
Nissan Qashqai
Renault Arkana
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Nissan Qashqai stands out with its spacious interior and advanced safety features, making it a top choice for families. Meanwhile, the Renault Arkana offers a more stylish coupe-SUV design, appealing to those looking for a distinctive aesthetic without …
Renault Arkana
Alpine A390
VS
The Renault Arkana and Alpine A390 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Opel Grandland
Renault Arkana
VS
The Opel Grandland and Renault Arkana compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mercedes EQS SUV
Renault Arkana

Costs and Consumption
Price
95,000 - 212,100 £
Price
28,500 - 31,900 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
19.6 - 21.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
615 - 695 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
108.4 - 118 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
106 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
4 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,695 - 3,075 kg
Curb weight
1,510 kg
Trunk capacity
440 - 645 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
5,125 mm
Length
-
Width
1,959 - 2,034 mm
Width
1,821 mm
Height
1,718 - 1,721 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
2,100 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
425 - 570 kg
Payload
451 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
360 - 658 HP
Power HP
143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.4 - 6.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 s
Max Speed
210 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
568 - 950 Nm
Torque
205 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
265 - 484 kW
Power kW
105 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2024
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
C
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Renault
What drive types are available for the Mercedes EQS SUV?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive or Rear-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.