VS

Mercedes EQS vs Skoda Kodiaq comparison

Compare performance (585 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (80,900 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQS or Skoda Kodiaq?

Mercedes EQS vs Skoda Kodiaq: Key differences

Mercedes EQS

  • significantly more power
  • significantly more electric range
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • substantially lighter
  • markedly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EQS

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Kodiaq is significantly cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the Mercedes EQS costs 80,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 43,039 £.

As for electric range, the Mercedes EQS offers significantly more range – reaching up to 920 km, about 798 km more than the Skoda Kodiaq.

Kodiaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes EQS offers significantly more power – delivering 585 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 320 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes EQS is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 4.1 s, while the Skoda Kodiaq takes 6.3 s. That’s about 2.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes EQS delivers considerably more torque with 800 Nm compared to 400 Nm. That’s about 400 Nm more.

EQS

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is substantially lighter – 1,684 kg compared to 2,550 kg. The difference is around 866 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers markedly more boot space – 910 L compared to 610 L. That’s a difference of about 300 L.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQS carries only slightly more – 570 kg compared to 563 kg. That’s a difference of about 7 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes EQS is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £80,900
EQS

Mercedes EQS

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 367 - 585 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.5 - 16.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 810 - 920 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Superb Combi
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Skoda Superb Combi is a roomy, practical estate that focuses on comfort and massive luggage space, while the Skoda Kodiaq is a taller, more versatile SUV that suits families needing optional seven-seat flexibility and a higher driving position. Choosing between them comes down to whether you …
Skoda Kodiaq
Jaecoo 7
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq and Jaecoo 7 are midsize SUVs aimed at families, but they're very different — the Kodiaq emphasizes European refinement, practicality and proven driving dynamics, while the Jaecoo 7 undercuts on price with generous tech and equipment from a newer Chinese brand. This comparison …
Mercedes EQS
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mercedes EQS

The Mercedes EQS is a silent, spaceship-like flagship that turns electric luxury into zen on wheels, wrapped in a swooping design that insists on being admired. Inside it’s all glassy screens and soft-touch surfaces that make long trips feel like first class, and the driving experience is composed and effortless — like a courteous butler with an electric heart.

details
21C0401_005
21C0401_007
21C0401_010
21C0401_012
21C0400_043

Reviews Mercedes EQS

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq is a practical, well built family SUV that puts space, comfort and usefulness ahead of showy gimmicks. Its composed ride, clever interior packaging and sensible feature set make it an easy, unpretentious choice for daily driving and longer journeys.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (6 Reviews)
rate
Geert
5 May 2026, 08:49:23

The Skoda Kodiac looks sleeker and is bigger. The Ford Explorer is a bit smaller and there was such a fuss made about it, but it’s disappointing in looks and even worse on the inside.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
zlatko P.
10 Feb 2026, 10:37:54

more for money, pracical

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Kuga
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Ford Kuga and Skoda Kodiaq are two popular midsize SUVs that balance everyday practicality with family-friendly space and efficient powertrains. This comparison focuses on driving dynamics, interior room, tech and running costs so you can quickly see which suits your priorities best.
Skoda Kodiaq
Toyota RAV4
VS
If you need seven seats, cavernous boot space and a grown-up ride, the Škoda Kodiaq is the sensible family hero that gets the job done without drama; it’s spacious, refined and embarrasses smaller SUVs at the supermarket run. The Toyota RAV4, meanwhile, is the rugged, hybrid-savvy all-rounder — …
Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
If you need room for a football team and their luggage, the Skoda Kodiaq is the grown‑up SUV — cavernous interior, composed long‑distance ride and clever storage touches that make family life embarrassingly easy. The VW Touran, by contrast, is the sharper, more city‑friendly people‑carrier with …
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Mercedes GLB
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mercedes GLB dresses up compact practicality in a premium suit, with crisp tech and city-friendly manners, while the Skoda Kodiaq goes full-on family hauler, offering cavernous space and sensible value. Choose the GLB for style and badge appeal; pick the Kodiaq if you need seats, luggage and a …
Skoda Kodiaq
MG MGS9
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq and the MG MGS9 are both family-sized SUVs that prioritise space and practicality, but they offer contrasting strengths — the Kodiaq leans on refinement and proven engineering, while the MGS9 trades on value and a feature-rich kit. This comparison focuses on interior space, driving …
Audi Q5
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Audi Q5 prowls the compact-luxury segment with silky engines, a refined cabin and tech that makes every commute feel a size class upscale — it’s for buyers who want polish and badge appeal. The Skoda Kodiaq, bigger and far more practical, stuffs in three rows, acres of boot space and a sensible …
Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Hyundai Tucson and Skoda Kodiaq pit a stylish, tech-packed compact crossover against a larger, family-focused SUV with up to seven seats. I’ll compare space, comfort, driving character and running costs so you can decide which suits your needs.
Mercedes EQS
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
80,900 - 117,500 £
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
15.5 - 16.3 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
810 - 920 km
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
35 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,550 - 2,660 kg
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Trunk capacity
610 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,926 mm
Width
1,864 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
545 - 570 kg
Payload
460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plug-in Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
367 - 585 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 6.2 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
505 - 800 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
270 - 430 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Skoda
What drive types are available for the Mercedes EQS?

The Mercedes EQS is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.