Compare performance (122 HP vs 487 HP), boot space and price (27,800 £ vs 37,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes EQT or XPeng G6?
In a world where the automotive landscape is swiftly transitioning towards electric mobility, the Mercedes EQT and the XPeng G6 stand out as remarkable contenders. Both vehicles bring an impressive suite of features to the table, embodying innovative designs, cutting-edge technology, and sustainable performance. Let's dive into the specifics and see how these two electric dynamos compare.
The Mercedes EQT presents itself as a versatile High Roof Wagon, characterized by its robust, boxy design that maximizes interior space. With a length ranging from 4498 to 4922 mm, width of 1859 mm, and height between 1819 to 1830 mm, it provides ample room for families or groups. Meanwhile, the XPeng G6 exudes a sportier flair in its SUV form, measuring 4753 mm in length and 1920 mm in width, with a notably lower height of 1650 mm, giving it a sleek, aerodynamic profile.
Under the hood, the EQT is powered by an electric motor delivering 122 HP and a torque of 245 Nm. This setup drives the front wheels, allowing for smooth acceleration from 0-100 km/h in 12.6 seconds. Its energy consumption ranges from 19.5 to 20.8 kWh/100km, offering an electric range of up to 278 km, powered by a 45 kWh battery.
Conversely, the XPeng G6 boasts a more robust electric performance with power options stretching up to an astonishing 476 HP and torque peaking at 660 Nm. It offers the versatility of both Rear-Wheel and All-Wheel Drive, accelerating from 0-100 km/h in as little as 4.1 seconds. Its efficiency shines with a consumption of 17.5 to 17.9 kWh/100km, supporting a range up to 570 km thanks to its larger 87.5 kWh battery.
Inside, the EQT prioritizes space and practicality with a generous trunk capacity ranging from 242 to 551 liters and a comfortable seating arrangement for five passengers. Designed for family outings or cargo needs, its high roof further enhances headroom and accessibility.
The XPeng G6 matches a spacious interior with luxury appointments. It also accommodates five seats, offering slightly more trunk space at 571 liters. Its cabin reflects a modern aesthetic, equipped with the latest infotainment and connectivity features aimed at providing a premium driving experience.
Both models maintain an impeccable environmental profile with zero emissions (0 g/km CO2), aligning with global standards for electric vehicle sustainability. They both achieve an "A" CO2 Efficiency Class, ensuring minimal environmental impact.
Choosing between the Mercedes EQT and the XPeng G6 largely depends on personal needs and preferences. The EQT is perfect for those prioritizing interior space and functionality, especially within urban landscapes. Meanwhile, the XPeng G6 appeals to those who crave performance and futuristic design. Each represents a significant step forward in electric vehicle technology, catering to varied tastes in the burgeoning EV market.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Mercedes EQT is visibly cheaper – starting at 27,800 £ , while the XPeng G6 costs 37,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 9,597 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the XPeng G6 is slightly more efficient: consuming 17.3 kWh/100km compared to 19.5 kWh/100km for the Mercedes EQT. That’s a difference of about 2.2 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the XPeng G6 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 525 km, about 247 km more than the Mercedes EQT.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the XPeng G6 offers considerably more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 122 HP. That’s roughly 365 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the XPeng G6 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.1 s, while the Mercedes EQT takes 12.6 s. That’s about 8.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the XPeng G6 delivers significantly more torque with 660 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 415 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Mercedes EQT is barely lighter – 1,925 kg compared to 2,065 kg. The difference is around 140 kg.
Looking at boot space, the XPeng G6 offers barely more boot space – 571 L compared to 551 L. That’s a difference of about 20 L.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes EQT carries somewhat more – 531 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 56 kg.
The XPeng G6 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Mercedes EQT is Mercedes‑Benz’s compact electric people carrier that grafts the brand’s usual refinement onto a practical, family‑friendly van body. It makes school runs feel a little more upscale — quietly electric, sensibly packaged and unexpectedly pleasant to live with, especially if you like your practicality with a touch of luxury.
details
The XPeng G6 looks like a sleeker, tech-rich alternative to conventional electric SUVs, with an interior that feels modern, airy and purposefully designed for everyday comfort. On the road it’s composed and surprisingly engaging, giving drivers a smart mix of calm refinement and a playful streak — not bad for a car that quietly challenges the usual premium suspects.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,800 - 32,100 £
|
Price
37,400 - 44,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.5 - 20.8 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.3 - 18.4 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
265 - 278 km
|
Electric Range
455 - 525 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
45 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
High Roof Estate
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,925 - 2,023 kg
|
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,220 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
242 - 551 L
|
Trunk capacity
571 L
|
|
Length
4,498 - 4,922 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,859 mm
|
Width
1,920 mm
|
|
Height
1,819 - 1,830 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,979 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
457 - 531 kg
|
Payload
470 - 475 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
122 HP
|
Power HP
252 - 487 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
12.6 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 6.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
132 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
245 Nm
|
Torque
440 - 660 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
90 kW
|
Power kW
185 - 358 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,024
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
XPeng
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España