VS

Mercedes GLC vs Toyota C-HR – Differences & prices compared

Two cars, one duel: Mercedes GLC meets Toyota C-HR.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

GLC @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Toyota C-HR has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29100 £, while the Mercedes GLC costs 50300 £. That’s a price difference of around 21193 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Toyota C-HR manages with 0.80 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the Mercedes GLC with 1.60 L. The difference is about 0.80 L per 100 km.

As for range, the Mercedes GLC performs decisively better – achieving up to 128 km, about 60 km more than the Toyota C-HR.

C-HR @ Toyota

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes GLC has a convincingly edge – offering 680 HP compared to 223 HP. That’s roughly 457 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Mercedes GLC is convincingly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.50 s, while the Toyota C-HR takes 7.40 s. That’s about 3.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Mercedes GLC performs noticeable better – reaching 275 km/h, while the Toyota C-HR tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 95 km/h.

GLC @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Toyota C-HR is noticeable lighter – 1505 kg compared to 1910 kg. The difference is around 405 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Mercedes GLC offers distinct more room – 620 L compared to 447 L. That’s a difference of about 173 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Mercedes GLC performs noticeable better – up to 1680 L, which is about 525 L more than the Toyota C-HR.

When it comes to payload, Mercedes GLC distinct takes the win – 600 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 175 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the Mercedes GLC shows itself to be dominates this comparison and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £50,300
22C0270_060

Mercedes GLC

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 186 - 680 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.6 - 9.9 L
  • Electric Range : 12 - 128 km
details

Mercedes GLC

4 (2)
rate

The Mercedes-Benz GLC exudes a refined elegance combined with a dynamic and sporty character, making it a standout in the SUV segment. It effortlessly blends luxury with practicality, offering a spacious interior fitted with high-quality materials and advanced technology features. The driving experience is both smooth and responsive, delivering a comfortable ride whether navigating city streets or embarking on longer journeys.

details
22C0270_060 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com
22C0270_055 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com
22C0270_051 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com
22C0270_046 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com
22C0270_031 @ group-media.mercedes-benz.com

Toyota C-HR

5 (1)
rate

The Toyota C-HR stands out with its distinctive and bold design that combines sleek, angular lines with a sporty posture. Its comfortable and stylish interior is equipped with advanced technology features, providing a seamless driving experience. The vehicle offers impressive handling and performance, making it a compelling choice for those who appreciate a blend of practicality and flair on the road.

details
64380-c-hr-grey-2020-25-web-lr @ Toyota
64412-c-hr-grey-2020-41-web-lr @ Toyota
64421-c-hr-grey-2020-32-web-lr @ Toyota
64409-c-hr-grey-2020-37-web-lr @ Toyota
64403-c-hr-grey-2020-52-web-lr @ Toyota

Similar Comparisons

Toyota C-HR
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
In a head-to-head comparison of the Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Yaris Cross, both compact SUVs showcase innovative design and versatility, appealing to urban drivers. While the C-HR brings a more striking aesthetic and a sporty driving experience, the Yaris Cross offers greater practicality with its spacious interior and advanced hybrid options. Ultimately, the choice will depend on whether you prioritize style or functionality in your daily commute.
Toyota C-HR
Toyota Corolla
VS
The Toyota C-HR and the Toyota Corolla are two compelling options for drivers seeking reliability and style. While the C-HR boasts a bold, crossover design with a higher driving position and sporty handling, the Corolla remains a benchmark in compact sedans, offering practicality and exceptional fuel efficiency. Choosing between them ultimately comes down to personal preference for aesthetics and lifestyle needs, as both models deliver impressive features and Toyota's renowned reliability.
Mercedes GLC
Toyota C-HR
GLC
C-HR

Costs and Consumption
Price
50300 - 126600 £
Price
29100 - 42800 £
Consumption L/100km
1.6 - 9.9 L
Consumption L/100km
0.8 - 5.1 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
12 - 128 km
Electric Range
68 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
41 - 225 g/km
co2
17 - 115 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
49 - 65 L
Fuel tank capacity
43 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1910 - 2400 kg
Curb weight
1505 - 1755 kg
Trunk capacity
390 - 620 L
Trunk capacity
350 - 447 L
Length
4716 - 4792 mm
Length
4362 mm
Width
1890 mm
Width
1832 mm
Height
1603 - 1647 mm
Height
1558 - 1564 mm
Max trunk capacity
1335 - 1680 L
Max trunk capacity
1076 - 1155 L
Payload
475 - 600 kg
Payload
375 - 425 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
CVT
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
186 - 680 HP
Power HP
140 - 223 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.5 - 9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.9 s
Max Speed
208 - 275 km/h
Max Speed
175 - 180 km/h
Torque
320 - 1020 Nm
Torque
-
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
137 - 500 kW
Power kW
103 - 164 kW
Engine capacity
1991 - 2989 cm3
Engine capacity
1798 - 1987 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, B
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, B
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Toyota

Similar Comparisons

Toyota C-HR
Volvo XC40
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Toyota C-HR and Volvo XC40 each bring their own unique flair to the table. While the C-HR impresses with its bold design and exceptional reliability, the XC40 stands out with its premium interior and cutting-edge technology. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on whether buyers prioritize style and affordability or luxury and innovation.
Kia Niro
Toyota C-HR
VS
The Kia Niro and Toyota C-HR present compelling choices for eco-conscious drivers seeking a stylish and efficient crossover. The Niro, with its hybrid and electric options, emphasizes fuel economy and a spacious interior, making it ideal for families or those with cargo needs. Meanwhile, the C-HR offers a more dynamic exterior design, appealing to those who prioritize a bold aesthetic alongside a spirited driving experience.
Lexus LBX
Toyota C-HR
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Lexus LBX and Toyota C-HR stand out with their unique blend of style and performance. The LBX offers a more luxurious interior and advanced features, while the C-HR remains a budget-friendly option that doesn't compromise on flair. Ultimately, both vehicles cater to different tastes, making the choice between them a reflection of personal preferences in luxury and practicality.
Mercedes GLC
Volvo XC60
VS
When it comes to luxury compact SUVs, the Mercedes GLC and Volvo XC60 both offer a blend of performance, style, and cutting-edge technology. The Mercedes GLC stands out with its elegant interior and advanced infotainment system, perfect for those who value luxury and connectivity. Alternatively, the Volvo XC60 impresses with its emphasis on safety features and Scandinavian design, appealing to buyers looking for both security and aesthetics in their driving experience.
Nissan Juke
Toyota C-HR
VS
In the battle of compact crossovers, the Nissan Juke and Toyota C-HR both offer unique appeal but cater to different driving preferences. The Juke stands out with its distinctive design and agile handling, appealing to those who favor a more spirited drive. Meanwhile, the C-HR impresses with its futuristic styling and standard advanced safety features, making it an attractive choice for tech-savvy drivers prioritizing safety and innovation.
Toyota C-HR
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV market, the Toyota C-HR stands out with its striking design and hybrid efficiency, appealing to eco-conscious drivers. In contrast, the VW T-Roc offers a more traditional, yet stylish approach with a focus on practicality and customizable features, catering to those who value versatility. Ultimately, both vehicles bring unique strengths to the table, making the choice between them largely dependent on personal preference and lifestyle needs.
BYD Seal U
Mercedes GLC
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the BYD Seal U showcases impressive electric performance and modern tech features, challenging the conventional luxury of the Mercedes GLC. While the Seal U offers an attractive price point and extended range, the GLC continues to excel with its refined interior and established brand prestige. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles will depend on whether drivers prioritize innovation or tradition in their automotive experience.
Mercedes GLC
Porsche Macan
VS
In the showdown between luxury SUVs, the Mercedes GLC offers a more refined cabin experience, with advanced tech features and a smooth ride. On the other hand, the Porsche Macan delivers an engaging driving performance, characterized by its sharp handling and sporty dynamics. Ultimately, while the GLC appeals to those seeking comfort and technology, the Macan is a top choice for driving enthusiasts who prioritize dynamic performance.
What drive types are available for the Mercedes GLC?

The Mercedes GLC is offered with All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.