VS

Mercedes Vito Transporter vs Nissan Juke comparison

Compare performance (237 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (28,800 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Vito Transporter or Nissan Juke?

Mercedes Vito Transporter vs Nissan Juke: Key differences

Mercedes Vito Transporter

  • visibly more power
details

Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • visibly cheaper
  • considerably more efficient
  • clearly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Vito Transporter

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Nissan Juke is visibly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Mercedes Vito Transporter costs 28,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,397 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Nissan Juke uses 4.7 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Mercedes Vito Transporter with 6.8 L/100km. The difference is about 2.1 L/100km.

Juke

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes Vito Transporter offers visibly more power – delivering 237 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 94 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes Vito Transporter delivers considerably more torque with 500 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 300 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Juke is clearly lighter – 1,274 kg compared to 1,916 kg. The difference is around 642 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Vito Transporter carries substantially more – 884 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 457 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Mercedes Vito Transporter holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £28,800
Vito Transporter

Mercedes Vito Transporter

  • Engine Type Diesel, Electric, Petrol
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 102 - 237 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 6.8 - 9.7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 21.2 - 26.5 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 304 - 474 km
Mercedes Vito Transporter
Nissan Juke

Costs and Consumption

View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance

View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body

View detailed analysis

Mercedes Vito Transporter

The Mercedes Vito Transporter is a supremely practical workhorse that blends Mercedes refinement with van-like utility, making long days on the road feel surprisingly civilized. With a cleverly thought-out interior and a drive that won’t wear you out, the Vito is the ideal choice for businesses that want capability without sacrificing comfort — and yes, it still looks sharper than most vans at a client meeting.

details

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details
Mercedes Vito Transporter
Nissan Juke

Costs and Consumption

Price
28,800 - 51,600 £
Price
21,400 - 30,100 £
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 9.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 26.5 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
304 - 474 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 222 g/km
co2
105 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
Cargo Van
Body Type
SUV
Seats
2 - 5
Seats
5
Doors
4
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,916 - 2,518 kg
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
Length
4,895 - 5,390 mm
Length
-
Width
1,928 mm
Width
1,800 mm
Height
1,910 - 1,945 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
3,100 - 6,600 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
547 - 884 kg
Payload
405 - 427 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
102 - 237 HP
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
Max Speed
120 - 140 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
270 - 500 Nm
Torque
200 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
75 - 174 kW
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
Engine capacity
1,950 - 1,999 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3

General

Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
Brand
Nissan
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.