Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mercedes Vito Transporter vs Suzuki Vitara comparison
Compare performance (237 HP vs 184 HP), boot space and price (28,800 £ vs 23,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mercedes Vito Transporter or Suzuki Vitara?
Mercedes Vito Transporter vs Suzuki Vitara: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Vito Transporter
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Suzuki Vitara is markedly cheaper – starting at 23,600 £ , while the Mercedes Vito Transporter costs 28,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,211 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Suzuki Vitara uses 5.3 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mercedes Vito Transporter with 6.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1.5 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Suzuki Vitara is considerably more efficient: consuming 14.9 kWh/100km compared to 21.2 kWh/100km for the Mercedes Vito Transporter. That’s a difference of about 6.3 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Mercedes Vito Transporter offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 474 km, about 48 km more than the Suzuki Vitara.
Vitara
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mercedes Vito Transporter offers noticeably more power – delivering 237 HP compared to 184 HP. That’s roughly 53 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Mercedes Vito Transporter delivers markedly more torque with 500 Nm compared to 307 Nm. That’s about 193 Nm more.
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Suzuki Vitara is considerably lighter – 1,255 kg compared to 1,916 kg. The difference is around 661 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Mercedes Vito Transporter carries clearly more – 884 kg compared to 425 kg. That’s a difference of about 459 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Mercedes Vito Transporter is slightly ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £28,800
Mercedes Vito Transporter
Mercedes Vito Transporter
Suzuki Vitara
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mercedes Vito Transporter
The Mercedes Vito Transporter is a supremely practical workhorse that blends Mercedes refinement with van-like utility, making long days on the road feel surprisingly civilized. With a cleverly thought-out interior and a drive that won’t wear you out, the Vito is the ideal choice for businesses that want capability without sacrificing comfort — and yes, it still looks sharper than most vans at a client meeting.
details
Suzuki Vitara
The Suzuki Vitara is a practical compact SUV that balances a comfortable, composed ride with easy-to-live-with interior space, making it well suited for daily driving and weekend getaways. It's widely praised for reliable engineering and sensible running costs, offering straightforward value to buyers who want a no-nonsense, economical crossover.
details
Mercedes Vito Transporter
Suzuki Vitara
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
28,800 - 51,600 £
|
Price
23,600 - 36,800 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 9.7 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 26.5 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.9 - 16.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
304 - 474 km
|
Electric Range
344 - 426 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
60 - 90 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 222 g/km
|
co2
0 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
57 - 70 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
2 - 5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,916 - 2,518 kg
|
Curb weight
1,255 - 1,935 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
310 - 375 L
|
|
Length
4,895 - 5,390 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,928 mm
|
Width
1,775 - 1,800 mm
|
|
Height
1,910 - 1,945 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
3,100 - 6,600 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
547 - 884 kg
|
Payload
395 - 425 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Electric, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
102 - 237 HP
|
Power HP
110 - 184 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.6 s
|
|
Max Speed
120 - 140 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
270 - 500 Nm
|
Torque
193 - 307 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
75 - 174 kW
|
Power kW
81 - 135 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,950 - 1,999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, A
|
|
Brand
Mercedes-Benz
|
Brand
Suzuki
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.