VS

MG Marvel R vs Suzuki S-Cross comparison

Compare performance (288 HP vs 110 HP), boot space and price (40,300 £ vs 21,800 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG Marvel R or Suzuki S-Cross?

MG Marvel R vs Suzuki S-Cross: Key differences

MG Marvel R

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
details

Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially cheaper
  • considerably lighter
  • somewhat more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Marvel R

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Suzuki S-Cross is substantially cheaper – starting at 21,800 £ , while the MG Marvel R costs 40,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18,515 £.

S-Cross

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the MG Marvel R offers substantially more power – delivering 288 HP compared to 110 HP. That’s roughly 178 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the MG Marvel R delivers significantly more torque with 665 Nm compared to 235 Nm. That’s about 430 Nm more.

Marvel R

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Suzuki S-Cross is considerably lighter – 1,280 kg compared to 1,810 kg. The difference is around 530 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Suzuki S-Cross offers somewhat more boot space – 430 L compared to 357 L. That’s a difference of about 73 L.

When it comes to payload, the MG Marvel R carries a bit more – 478 kg compared to 405 kg. That’s a difference of about 73 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG Marvel R stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £40,300
Marvel R

MG Marvel R

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 180 - 288 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 19.4 - 20.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 370 - 402 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Vitara
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Vitara take different approaches to the compact SUV segment: the S-Cross leans towards comfort, refinement and value, while the Vitara offers a more rugged look and a livelier driving character. I’ll outline their strengths in space, ride, economy and equipment to …
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
MG Marvel R
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG Marvel R

The MG Marvel R combines striking, futuristic styling with a surprisingly spacious, gadget-packed cabin, giving shoppers a sharply styled electric alternative that punches above its price. It may not carry luxury-badge prestige, but it delivers honest daily usability and enough charisma to tempt buyers who want electric flair without the premium tax.

details
MG-Marvel-R-PRESS-KIT_01
MG-Marvel-R-PRESS-KIT_03
MG-Marvel-R-PRESS-KIT_09
Marvel-R-hero-back
MG-Marvel-R-PRESS-KIT_08
Marvel-R-steering-wheel
Marvel-R-frunk

Reviews MG Marvel R

4.4 (1 Reviews)
rate
Robin Prins
21 Feb 2026, 06:26:34

Nice-handling SUV. Steers much more sharply than my previous SUV, a Lynk & Co 01. Has almost the same options as the Lynk. I wanted fully electric, though. The Marvel has a realistic range. So far it has never shown the WLTP figure of 402. But whatever it shows, it achieves. And I've experienced that very differently before (Lynk & Co 01 and Mazda MX-30). In short, a very good, comfortable EV. Downsides: abrupt steering corrections and annoying warning beeps. These can be switched off, but you have to do it every time. It's also a shame that the otherwise great navigation has no Dutch voice.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Suzuki S-Cross

The Suzuki S-Cross is a practical, well-built compact crossover that puts comfort, efficiency and everyday reliability first. With a roomy cabin, straightforward technology and sensible design, it’s a no-nonsense choice for buyers seeking a versatile family car.

details
Suzuki_S-Cross_001
Suzuki_S-Cross_004
Suzuki_S-Cross_016
Suzuki_S-Cross_037
Suzuki_S-Cross_040
Suzuki_S-Cross_049
S-CROSS_innen2

Reviews Suzuki S-Cross

4.7 (4 Reviews)
rate
Miroljub
6 Nov 2025, 11:17:36

best

Frequently compared as well

Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Suzuki S-Cross and the Toyota Yaris Cross are compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV practicality in a city-friendly package. The S-Cross leans toward space and straightforward value, while the Yaris Cross prioritises hybrid efficiency, urban agility and advanced safety tech—so pick …
Suzuki S-Cross
Toyota Corolla Cross
VS
The Suzuki S‑Cross is the scrappy, value-packed compact SUV — cheaper to buy, nimbler in town and surprisingly practical, while the Toyota Corolla Cross trades a little driving sparkle for Toyota’s famed refinement, stronger safety kit and an efficient hybrid powertrain. Pick the S‑Cross if you …
Skoda Karoq
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
The Skoda Karoq and Suzuki S‑Cross are compact crossover SUVs aimed at buyers who want a practical, comfortable daily driver with a raised seating position and SUV versatility. This comparison focuses on interior space, comfort, driving dynamics, equipment and running costs to help you decide which …
Nissan Qashqai
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Choosing a compact SUV is more about lifestyle than just luggage space, and in this matchup the Nissan Qashqai brings glossy tech, a classy cabin and composed road manners. The Suzuki S-Cross counters with sensible packaging, economical engines and value that won’t make your wallet faint — which …
Suzuki S-Cross
Suzuki Across
VS
Here’s a straight-talk comparison of the Suzuki S-Cross and the Suzuki Across to help you decide which crossover suits your lifestyle and budget. The S-Cross is a practical, affordable compact crossover focused on efficiency and comfort, while the Across is a larger plug-in hybrid with stronger …
Opel Frontera
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Unsure whether the Opel Frontera or the Suzuki S-Cross is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Suzuki S-Cross
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the Suzuki S-Cross and VW T-Roc stand out with their unique offerings. The S-Cross impresses with its practicality and robust all-wheel-drive capabilities, making it a versatile choice for adventure-seekers. Meanwhile, the T-Roc captivates with its stylish …
Ford Puma
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the world of compact SUVs, the Ford Puma and Suzuki S-Cross each bring unique strengths to the table. The Ford Puma turns heads with its athletic design and responsive EcoBoost engine, ideal for those who prioritize style and dynamic driving. Meanwhile, the Suzuki S-Cross offers a more pragmatic …
MG Marvel R
Suzuki S-Cross

Costs and Consumption
Price
40,300 - 43,700 £
Price
21,800 - 34,200 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
19.4 - 20.9 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
370 - 402 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
66.1 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
119 - 138 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,810 - 1,920 kg
Curb weight
1,280 - 1,385 kg
Trunk capacity
357 L
Trunk capacity
430 L
Length
4,674 mm
Length
-
Width
1,919 mm
Width
1,785 mm
Height
1,613 mm
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
1,396 L
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
453 - 478 kg
Payload
395 - 405 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
180 - 288 HP
Power HP
110 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Max Speed
200 km/h
Max Speed
-
Torque
410 - 665 Nm
Torque
235 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
132 - 212 kW
Power kW
81 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
1,373 cm3

General
Model Year
2021
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
Brand
MG
Brand
Suzuki
What drivetrain options does the MG Marvel R have?

The MG Marvel R is offered with Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.