Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
MG Marvel R vs Volvo EX30 comparison
Compare performance (288 HP vs 428 HP), boot space and price (40,300 £ vs 33,000 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG Marvel R or Volvo EX30?
MG Marvel R vs Volvo EX30: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Marvel R
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Volvo EX30 is visibly cheaper – starting at 33,000 £ , while the MG Marvel R costs 40,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,286 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo EX30 is a bit more efficient: consuming 17 kWh/100km compared to 19.4 kWh/100km for the MG Marvel R. That’s a difference of about 2.4 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Volvo EX30 offers somewhat more range – reaching up to 476 km, about 74 km more than the MG Marvel R.
EX30
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX30 offers visibly more power – delivering 428 HP compared to 288 HP. That’s roughly 140 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX30 is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 3.6 s, while the MG Marvel R takes 4.9 s. That’s about 1.3 s quicker.
Looking at top speed, the MG Marvel R is barely faster – reaching 200 km/h, while the Volvo EX30 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the MG Marvel R delivers a bit more torque with 665 Nm compared to 543 Nm. That’s about 122 Nm more.
Marvel R
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MG Marvel R is only slightly lighter – 1,810 kg compared to 1,840 kg. The difference is around 30 kg.
Looking at boot space, the MG Marvel R offers somewhat more boot space – 357 L compared to 318 L. That’s a difference of about 39 L.
For maximum load capacity, the MG Marvel R offers clearly more capacity – up to 1,396 L, about 396 L more than the Volvo EX30.
When it comes to payload, the MG Marvel R carries a bit more – 478 kg compared to 390 kg. That’s a difference of about 88 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Volvo EX30 holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £33,000
Volvo EX30
MG Marvel R
Volvo EX30
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
MG Marvel R
The MG Marvel R combines striking, futuristic styling with a surprisingly spacious, gadget-packed cabin, giving shoppers a sharply styled electric alternative that punches above its price. It may not carry luxury-badge prestige, but it delivers honest daily usability and enough charisma to tempt buyers who want electric flair without the premium tax.
details
Volvo EX30
The Volvo EX30 arrives as a compact electric with crisp Scandinavian design and a cheeky personality, proving you can be serious about safety and still enjoy a grin on your commute. Its cabin is cleverly packaged and delightfully easy to live with, offering smart tech and practical touches that make it feel like a grown-up's city car with a sense of fun.
details
MG Marvel R
Volvo EX30
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
40,300 - 43,700 £
|
Price
33,000 - 49,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19.4 - 20.9 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17 - 18.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
370 - 402 km
|
Electric Range
339 - 476 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
66.1 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
49 - 65 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,810 - 1,920 kg
|
Curb weight
1,840 - 1,960 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
357 L
|
Trunk capacity
318 L
|
|
Length
4,674 mm
|
Length
4,233 mm
|
|
Width
1,919 mm
|
Width
1,838 mm
|
|
Height
1,613 mm
|
Height
1,550 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,396 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,000 L
|
|
Payload
453 - 478 kg
|
Payload
370 - 390 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
-
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
180 - 288 HP
|
Power HP
272 - 428 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 7.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 5.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
410 - 665 Nm
|
Torque
343 - 543 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
132 - 212 kW
|
Power kW
200 - 315 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2021
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
MG
|
Brand
Volvo
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.