In the burgeoning electric SUV market, the BMW iX1 and Volvo EX30 stand out as compelling choices, each offering a unique blend of performance and practicality. The iX1 impresses with its sporty handling and luxurious interior, while the EX30 emphasizes safety and innovative tech features, appealing to eco-conscious drivers. Ultimately, the decision may come down to personal preferences in styling and driving dynamics, as both models exemplify their brands' commitment to electric mobility.
As the automotive landscape continues to evolve towards electrification, the competition among electric SUVs is heating up. Two exciting contenders in this segment are the BMW iX1 and the Volvo EX30. Both compact electric SUVs offer modern design, impressive performance, and a range of innovative features that appeal to a growing segment of eco-conscious consumers. In this comparison, we delve into their technical specifications, innovative technologies, and driving dynamics.
The BMW iX1, with its sleek lines and muscular stance, measures 4500 mm in length, 1845 mm in width, and stands 1616 mm tall. This distinctly BMW vehicle combines functional aesthetics with sporty allure, embodying the brand's iconic design language.
In contrast, the Volvo EX30 takes a more minimalistic and Scandanavian approach. Measuring 4233 mm in length, 1837 mm in width, and 1549 mm in height, it emanates a modern vibe that is both sophisticated and practical. The EX30's dimensions may be more compact, but its design maximizes interior space, offering comfort for up to five passengers.
Under the hood, the BMW iX1 is available in two configurations: the sDrive20 and the xDrive30, delivering power outputs of 204 HP and 313 HP, respectively. The electric range varies between 436 km and 463 km, making it a dependable choice for urban commutes and longer journeys alike. With an acceleration time of 0-100 km/h in just 8.6 seconds for the sDrive and a thrilling 5.6 seconds for the xDrive, the iX1 is more than just a stylish SUV; it’s also a sporty performer.
On the other hand, the Volvo EX30 offers more aggressive power training options. The base model produces 272 HP, while the top-tier variant boasts a robust 428 HP. The electric range spans from 339 km to an impressive 476 km, showcasing Volvo's innovation in battery efficiency. The EX30 excels particularly with its performance, achieving a staggering 0-100 km/h in as little as 3.6 seconds, making it one of the quickest in its class.
Battery technology is a crucial element of any electric vehicle, and both models deliver impressive specifications. The iX1 comes with a battery capacity of either 64.8 kWh or 77 kWh, while the EX30 offers options of 49 kWh or 65 kWh. The BMW's higher capacity allows for longer distances, while the EX30’s various options provide flexibility for different consumer needs.
In terms of energy consumption, the iX1 performs admirably with a consumption rating of 15.8 kWh/100 km, though the EX30’s 17.0 kWh/100 km is still competitive. With CO2 emissions classified as "A" for both models, they both represent a step towards sustainability and responsible driving.
Both vehicles are equipped with cutting-edge technology that enhances the driving experience. BMW's iX1 boasts the latest iDrive system, complete with an intuitive infotainment system that supports wireless Apple CarPlay and Android Auto. Advanced driver assistance systems ensure safety and convenience, making urban driving less stressful.
Volvo, known for its commitment to safety, incorporates an impressive suite of safety technologies in the EX30. Its digital interface is user-friendly, featuring a large touchscreen with over-the-air update capabilities, ensuring that the car remains up-to-date with the latest software enhancements and safety features.
When comparing the BMW iX1 and Volvo EX30, your choice ultimately depends on your personal preferences and driving needs. The iX1 offers a larger electric range and a dynamic driving experience, while the EX30 thrills with its remarkable acceleration and unique design. Both are formidable entries in the electric SUV market, embodying the future of mobility.
Whether you prioritize performance, range, design, or advanced technology, each model stands as a testament to what the automotive world has to offer in this electric revolution. So, which one will be your electrifying companion on the road ahead?
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 41500 - 54100
£
|
Price
about 34100 - 49100
£
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
15.8 - 17.1
kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17 - 18.7
kWh
|
Electric Range
436 - 463
km
|
Electric Range
339 - 476
km
|
Battery Capacity
64.8
kWh
|
Battery Capacity
49 - 65
kWh
|
co2
0
g/km
|
co2
0
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1940 - 2085
kg
|
Curb weight
1840 - 1983
kg
|
Trunk capacity
490
L
|
Trunk capacity
318
L
|
Length
4500
mm
|
Length
4233
mm
|
Width
1845
mm
|
Width
1837
mm
|
Height
1616
mm
|
Height
1549 - 1567
mm
|
Payload
495
kg
|
Payload
352 - 390
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
204 - 313
HP
|
Power HP
272 - 428
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.6 - 8.6
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.6 - 5.7
s
|
Max Speed
170 - 180
km/h
|
Max Speed
180
km/h
|
Torque
250 - 494
Nm
|
Torque
343 - 543
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Power kW
150 - 230
kW
|
Power kW
200 - 315
kW
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Top speed
170 - 180
km/h
|
Top speed
180
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2022 - 2023
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
Brand
BMW
|
Brand
Volvo
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.