VS

MG MGS9 vs Skoda Kodiaq comparison

Compare performance (299 HP vs 265 HP), boot space and price (38,600 £ vs 37,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG MGS9 or Skoda Kodiaq?

MG MGS9 vs Skoda Kodiaq: Key differences

MG MGS9

  • somewhat more power
details

Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally cheaper
  • clearly more efficient
  • moderately more electric range
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly lighter
  • substantially more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

MGS9

Skoda Kodiaq VS MG MGS9: a quick take for buyers

Skoda Kodiaq VS MG MGS9 frames two very different ideas of what a large family SUV should be: the Skoda Kodiaq leans into maximum luggage, rear‑seat space and motorway calm, while the MG MGS9 trades a bit of luggage depth for a genuine seven‑seat layout and aggressive value. The Kodiaq feels like a composed touring car built around sensible usability, the MG MGS9 like a pragmatic space carrier that gives you more seats and kit for less. Each car therefore answers a different family brief — oversized cargo and long trips versus full‑house seating and everyday economy. Read on for the practical trade‑offs that matter most in real life, not just on paper.

Kodiaq

Character and driving manners

The Skoda Kodiaq projects steady, confidence‑first manners: light, undemanding steering and a focus on quiet, stable progress make it an easy long‑distance companion. The MG MGS9 presents itself as softer and more EV‑like around town, with a calm PHEV character that masks engine transitions at low speeds but can show some front‑wheel strain under hard thrust. If you prize communicative steering and sharper responses you’ll miss that in both — the Kodiaq tolerates it for comfort, the MGS9 accepts it as part of its relaxed, value‑centric package. In short, the Kodiaq is the composed cruiser; the MGS9 is the gentle mover that’s happiest on predictable suburban and commuting duties.

Comfort and long‑distance use

For sustained motorway miles the Skoda Kodiaq has the upper hand: it soaks up speed and stays hushed and composed, which keeps fatigue lower on long runs. The MG MGS9 is comfortable and well equipped for long days too, but its PHEV focus and some tyre/road noise make it feel a touch less cultivated at high speed when compared side‑by‑side. If you plan a lot of cross‑country driving with heavy luggage the Kodiaq’s calm demeanour and tuned ride are reassuring; if your longer trips start from a fully charged battery and you can recharge at intervals, the MG MGS9’s electric day‑to‑day serenity will be very pleasant. Both cars have trim choices that affect ride harshness, so wheel and suspension spec matters more than brand alone.

Practicality, seats and family usability

Practicality is where the split is clearest: the Skoda Kodiaq prioritises cargo space and second‑row comfort, making a clearer case for families who travel with lots of kit or tow regularly, while the MG MGS9 gives you true seven‑seat flexibility and a sliding second row to make three‑row life genuinely usable. That means the Kodiaq will suit households that put luggage capacity and easy loading at the top of the list, whereas the MGS9 will suit larger families who actually need to carry seven people more often. There are trade‑offs in child‑seat mounting and seat access — the MG’s packaging is clever but limits some ISOFIX options, and the Kodiaq’s PHEV versions reduce the seven‑seat option — so choose based on whether seats or boot space is non‑negotiable.

Cabin feel, tech and perceived quality

The Skoda Kodiaq’s interior aims for a slightly more refined, practical ambience with clear controls and a cleaner material feel that reads a touch more premium in everyday use. The MG MGS9 punches above its price with a generously specified cabin and features that make life comfortable, but the infotainment responsiveness and some control surfaces reveal cost‑conscious engineering. In practice the Kodiaq often feels more settled and logically arranged for regular use, while the MGS9 feels like a well‑equipped bargain — you get a lot for your money but with the occasional reminder of compromises. Buyers who care about long‑term tactile quality and polish will tilt toward the Kodiaq; those prioritising kit and value will find the MG hard to ignore.

Who each car suits — a buyer fit conclusion

Choose the Skoda Kodiaq if your priorities are maximum luggage, relaxed motorway miles and a welcoming, slightly more upmarket cabin for long family trips where space and towing predictability matter. Opt for the MG MGS9 if you need an honest seven‑seater right away, want an everyday PHEV feel with strong equipment for the money, and can charge regularly to capitalise on the electric mode. The decision is a trade‑off between cargo/long‑distance refinement and raw family seating plus value; your typical trip profile — lots of luggage and autobahn cruising versus seven passengers and frequent short electric runs — should decide the direction. Next up: the technical comparison breaks down powertrains, electric range, towing capacity and cargo measurements so you can match numbers to the real‑world conclusions above.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kodiaq
VW Tayron
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq and VW Tayron are closely related midsize SUVs that focus on practicality and solid build quality, but they appeal to slightly different tastes and priorities. This quick comparison will help you decide whether the Kodiaq’s family-friendly versatility or the Tayron’s more …
MG HS
MG MGS9
VS
Choosing between the MG HS and the MG MGS9 comes down to whether you value compact practicality and efficiency or a larger, more upmarket presence and space. This quick comparison will focus on driving feel, interior room, technology and running costs to help you pick the best fit.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

MGS9

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Kodiaq is marginally cheaper – starting at 37,900 £ , while the MG MGS9 costs 38,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 685 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Skoda Kodiaq uses 1.5 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the MG MGS9 with 2.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.9 L/100km.

As for electric range, the Skoda Kodiaq offers moderately more range – reaching up to 122 km, about 22 km more than the MG MGS9.

Kodiaq

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the MG MGS9 offers somewhat more power – delivering 299 HP compared to 265 HP. That’s roughly 34 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Kodiaq is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 6.3 s, while the MG MGS9 takes 9.6 s. That’s about 3.3 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Skoda Kodiaq delivers only slightly more torque with 400 Nm compared to 390 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Seats: MG MGS9 offers more seats – 7 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, Skoda Kodiaq is clearly lighter – 1,684 kg compared to 2,160 kg. The difference is around 476 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Skoda Kodiaq offers substantially more boot space – 910 L compared to 332 L. That’s a difference of about 578 L.

When it comes to payload, the Skoda Kodiaq carries very slightly more – 563 kg compared to 557 kg. That’s a difference of about 6 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Kodiaq is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £37,900
Kodiaq

Skoda Kodiaq

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 150 - 265 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
  • Electric Range 119 - 122 km
details
MG MGS9
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG MGS9

The MG MGS9 presents itself as a stylish, value-focused flagship SUV with a roomy, well-equipped cabin and contemporary infotainment. It balances a comfortable ride with engaging handling, making it a compelling choice for buyers seeking a feature-rich alternative to established rivals.

details
serpimg_mb8neH

Reviews MG MGS9

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Skoda Kodiaq

The Skoda Kodiaq is a practical, well built family SUV that puts space, comfort and usefulness ahead of showy gimmicks. Its composed ride, clever interior packaging and sensible feature set make it an easy, unpretentious choice for daily driving and longer journeys.

details
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112967
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112975
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112969
KODIAQ_45646
KODIAQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_112984

Reviews Skoda Kodiaq

4.9 (5 Reviews)
rate
Geert
5 May 2026, 08:49:23

The Skoda Kodiac looks sleeker and is bigger. The Ford Explorer is a bit smaller and there was such a fuss made about it, but it’s disappointing in looks and even worse on the inside.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
zlatko P.
10 Feb 2026, 10:37:54

more for money, pracical

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kodiaq
VW Touran
VS
If you need room for a football team and their luggage, the Skoda Kodiaq is the grown‑up SUV — cavernous interior, composed long‑distance ride and clever storage touches that make family life embarrassingly easy. The VW Touran, by contrast, is the sharper, more city‑friendly people‑carrier with …
Peugeot 5008
MG MGS9
VS
Putting the Peugeot 5008 up against the MG MGS9 pitches a well-rounded, family-focused European SUV against a recent, value-driven contender packed with features. The 5008 leans on refined ride quality, practical seven-seat packaging and established build quality, while the MGS9 competes with bold …
Skoda Enyaq
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
Skoda Enyaq and Skoda Kodiaq target very different buyers: the Enyaq is an all-electric SUV focused on efficiency, modern tech and city-friendly driving, while the Kodiaq is a larger, traditional family SUV offering seven seats, greater towing and cargo capacity. This quick comparison highlights …
Skoda Kodiaq
Mitsubishi Outlander
VS
The Skoda Kodiaq and the Mitsubishi Outlander both aim at buyers needing a practical, family-friendly SUV, but they take different approaches—Kodiaq prioritizes space and refinement, while Outlander leans on value and versatility. This comparison highlights the strengths and trade-offs so you can …
Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Hyundai Tucson and Skoda Kodiaq pit a stylish, tech-packed compact crossover against a larger, family-focused SUV with up to seven seats. I’ll compare space, comfort, driving character and running costs so you can decide which suits your needs.
Volvo XC90
MG MGS9
VS
The Volvo XC90 and the MG MGS9 are rival seven-seat SUVs aimed at buyers who want space, comfort and modern tech — but they come from very different traditions: Volvo leans on safety, refined materials and a premium driving feel, while MG focuses on affordability and generous equipment. This quick …
Mercedes GLB
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Mercedes GLB dresses up compact practicality in a premium suit, with crisp tech and city-friendly manners, while the Skoda Kodiaq goes full-on family hauler, offering cavernous space and sensible value. Choose the GLB for style and badge appeal; pick the Kodiaq if you need seats, luggage and a …
Skoda Superb Combi
Skoda Kodiaq
VS
The Skoda Superb Combi is a roomy, practical estate that focuses on comfort and massive luggage space, while the Skoda Kodiaq is a taller, more versatile SUV that suits families needing optional seven-seat flexibility and a higher driving position. Choosing between them comes down to whether you …
MG MGS9
Skoda Kodiaq

Costs and Consumption
Price
38,600 - 41,800 £
Price
37,900 - 50,600 £
Consumption L/100km
2.4 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.5 - 8.2 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
100 km
Electric Range
119 - 122 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
54 g/km
co2
35 - 186 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
7
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,160 kg
Curb weight
1,684 - 1,970 kg
Trunk capacity
332 L
Trunk capacity
745 - 910 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,967 mm
Width
1,864 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
557 kg
Payload
460 - 563 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive, Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
299 HP
Power HP
150 - 265 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.6 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.3 - 9.7 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
390 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
220 kW
Power kW
110 - 195 kW
Engine capacity
1,496 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, G, E, B
Brand
MG
Brand
Skoda
What drivetrain options does the MG MGS9 have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.