Compare performance (197 HP vs 280 HP), boot space and price (18000 £ vs 36900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG ZS or Lynk & Co 01?
In the rapidly evolving landscape of SUVs, two models stand out with their distinct approaches to performance, efficiency, and technology: the MG ZS and the Lynk & Co 01. Both offer a compelling mix of features and innovations, yet cater to different preferences and priorities. Here’s how they stack up against each other.
The MG ZS provides a versatile range of powertrains, including electric, full hybrid, and petrol engines. The electric variant boasts an impressive battery capacity of up to 65.7 kWh, delivering a range of 440 km, which is noteworthy in its class. The compact SUV exhibits power outputs ranging from 116 HP to 197 HP, with a maximum torque of 280 Nm, and can accelerate from 0 to 100 km/h in approximately 8.6 to 8.7 seconds.
In contrast, the Lynk & Co 01 utilizes a plugin hybrid system that generates between 261 HP to 276 HP and torque figures of between 425 and 535 Nm. It offers an electric-only range of 75 km, thanks to its 14.1 kWh battery, making it highly efficient with a consumption rate as low as 0.9 L/100 km in hybrid mode. Its dual-clutch automatic transmission ensures a smoother and more efficient driving experience with a top speed reaching up to 210 km/h and an acceleration of 0-100 km/h in 7.7 to 8 seconds.
On the exterior, the MG ZS measures between 4323 to 4430 mm in length, 1809 to 1818 mm in width, and 1635 to 1649 mm in height. With a trunk capacity between 443 and 448 liters, it offers ample space for everyday use, further complemented by its seating for five passengers.
The Lynk & Co 01 is slightly larger, measuring between 4541 to 4545 mm in length, 1857 to 1860 mm in width, and 1694 mm in height. It offers a slightly larger trunk capacity of 466 liters. The interior is marked by a modern design focus, comfortably seating five passengers.
Both SUVs cater to environmentally conscious consumers but do so differently. The MG ZS can boast zero emissions in its fully electric variant. In contrast, the Lynk & Co 01, a plugin hybrid, achieves impressively low emissions, remaining below 24 g/km of CO2, thanks to its efficient hybrid setup.
The choice between the MG ZS and the Lynk & Co 01 hinges on your priorities. If you’re seeking a transition towards electric mobility, the MG ZS’s fully electric variant is appealing with its extensive range and zero emissions. Alternatively, the Lynk & Co 01 presents a balanced approach with its plugin hybrid system, providing both efficiency and potent performance.
Both models showcase the shift towards more sustainable automotive solutions while offering distinct features tailored to different consumer needs. Whether it’s the versatile efficiency of the MG ZS or the performance-oriented design of the Lynk & Co 01, each SUV brings its own strengths to the table.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
MG ZS has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 18000 £ , while the Lynk & Co 01 costs 36900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 18861 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Lynk & Co 01 manages with 0.90 L and is therefore convincingly more efficient than the MG ZS with 5 L. The difference is about 4.10 L per 100 km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 01 has a clearly perceptible edge – offering 280 HP compared to 197 HP. That’s roughly 83 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lynk & Co 01 is to a small extent quicker – completing the sprint in 7.70 s, while the MG ZS takes 8.70 s. That’s about 1 s faster.
There’s also a difference in torque: Lynk & Co 01 pulls significantly stronger with 535 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 387 Nm difference.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, MG ZS is significantly lighter – 1330 kg compared to 1935 kg. The difference is around 605 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Lynk & Co 01 offers minimal more room – 466 L compared to 443 L. That’s a difference of about 23 L.
When it comes to payload, MG ZS slightly takes the win – 470 kg compared to 415 kg. That’s a difference of about 55 kg.
The Lynk & Co 01 sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The MG ZS arrives as a cheeky and practical choice for shoppers who want SUV style and family-friendly space without blowing the budget. It may not pretend to be premium, but with sensible equipment, easy-to-live-with driving manners and surprising value, it makes a persuasive case for anyone after sensible transport with a bit of personality.
details
The Lynk & Co 01 marries bold, contemporary styling with a roomy, well-appointed cabin, striking a rare balance between fashionable flair and everyday practicality. With intuitive tech, flexible ownership ideas and a playful driving character, it’s the kind of crossover that turns heads at the lights and keeps owners grinning on the commute.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
18000 - 24000 £
|
Price
36900 - 40300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5 - 6.5 L
|
Consumption L/100km
0.90 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
75 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
113 - 145 g/km
|
co2
20 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
41 - 55 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1330 - 1420 kg
|
Curb weight
1935 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
443 L
|
Trunk capacity
466 L
|
|
Length
4430 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1818 mm
|
Width
1860 mm
|
|
Height
1635 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1457 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
375 - 470 kg
|
Payload
415 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
|
Power HP
280 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.70 s
|
|
Max Speed
168 - 179 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
Torque
535 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
|
Power kW
206 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1495 - 1498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1499 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, E
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
|
Brand
MG
|
Brand
Lynk & Co
|
The MG ZS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España