Compare performance (197 HP vs 148 HP), boot space and price (18,000 £ vs 29,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG ZS or Renault Austral?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
In the ever-evolving world of automotive innovation, the SUV segment continues to dominate with exciting offerings from a range of automakers. In this comparison, we pit the versatile MG ZS against the dynamic Renault Austral to see which vehicle stands out in terms of performance, design, and technology.
The MG ZS and Renault Austral both present sleek and modern designs characteristic of today's SUVs. The MG ZS is slightly more compact with a length of up to 4,430 mm, a width of 1,818 mm, and a height of 1,635 mm. Meanwhile, the Austral offers more spacious dimensions with a length of 4,510 mm, width of 1,825 mm, and a height of 1,618 mm.
For practical family usage, trunk capacity is crucial. The Australs take the lead with a maximum trunk capacity of 500 liters compared to the 448 liters in the MG ZS, making the Austral a better choice for those who prioritize cargo space.
Both SUVs come equipped with front-wheel drive systems, catering well to urban and suburban environments. However, their powertrains differ significantly. The MG ZS offers versatile engine options, comprising electric, full hybrid, and petrol variants with power outputs ranging from 116 HP to 197 HP. It shines in terms of acceleration, achieving 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.6 seconds.
Conversely, the Renault Austral features petrol mild-hybrid and full-hybrid engines producing between 158 HP and 200 HP. Its acceleration to 100 km/h is a bit more leisurely at 8.4 to 9.7 seconds, but it compensates with slightly better fuel efficiency.
Efficiency is a key consideration, especially for environmentally-conscious buyers. The hybrid MG ZS models boast an electric range of up to 440 km, with fuel consumption rates as low as 5.0 L/100km for petrol variants. These attributes make it an excellent choice for those prioritizing low emissions and extended electric driving.
Renault Austral offers commendable fuel efficiency too, with the hybrid achieving a consumption of 4.7 L/100km. Despite not having a fully electric option, its CO2 emissions remain competitive at 105 g/km.
Both SUVs integrate contemporary technology essential for today's drivers. The MG ZS comes with automatic and manual gearbox options, providing choice and flexibility. Its electric variant is equipped with a reduction gearbox, optimizing power delivery and efficiency.
The Renault Austral is innovatively engineered with a continuously variable transmission (CVT), enhancing driving smoothness and fuel efficiency. This gearbox matches the Austral's focus on comfort and economy.
The choice between the MG ZS and Renault Austral boils down to specific needs and preferences. The MG ZS, with its diverse powertrain options, excels in performance versatility and offers an acclaimed electric variant. In contrast, the Renault Austral stands out with its spacious design and efficient hybrid powertrain, making it ideal for families seeking convenience and eco-friendliness.
Ultimately, both the MG ZS and Renault Austral are commendable contenders in the SUV market, each with distinct strengths catering to different segments of drivers.
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
MG ZS is significantly cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Renault Austral costs 29,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,923 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG ZS uses 5.1 L/100km and is visibly more efficient than the Renault Austral with 6.4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.3 L/100km.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS offers clearly more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 148 HP. That’s roughly 49 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG ZS is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 8.7 s, while the Renault Austral takes 9.9 s. That’s about 1.2 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Austral delivers considerably more torque with 270 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 122 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is slightly lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,548 kg. The difference is around 218 kg.
When it comes to payload, the MG ZS carries very slightly more – 470 kg compared to 455 kg. That’s a difference of about 15 kg.
The MG ZS is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The MG ZS is a compact crossover that delivers strong value with a roomy cabin and straightforward tech, making it a sensible choice for budget-minded buyers. It’s easy to live with, offering comfortable rides and a practical layout that suits daily commutes and family errands.
details
The Renault Austral is a stylish, well-built crossover that blends a comfortable ride with a spacious, modern cabin. It combines everyday-friendly refinement and contemporary technology with a focus on safety and practicality, making it a sensible choice for drivers who want an all-round family car.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
|
Price
29,900 - 34,100 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6.4 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
115 - 145 g/km
|
co2
145 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
|
Curb weight
1,548 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,818 mm
|
Width
1,825 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
375 - 470 kg
|
Payload
455 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
|
Power HP
148 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
148 Nm
|
Torque
270 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
|
Power kW
109 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,332 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E
|
|
Brand
MG
|
Brand
Renault
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
España