VS

MG ZS vs Renault Trafic Transporter comparison

Compare performance (197 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (18,000 £ vs 38,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG ZS or Renault Trafic Transporter?

MG ZS vs Renault Trafic Transporter: Key differences

MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • slightly more power
  • markedly more efficient
  • clearly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably lighter
details

Renault Trafic Transporter

details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ZS

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

MG ZS is clearly cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the Renault Trafic Transporter costs 38,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 20,106 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG ZS uses 5.1 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Renault Trafic Transporter with 6.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1.7 L/100km.

Trafic Transporter

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS offers slightly more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 170 HP. That’s roughly 27 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG ZS is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 8.7 s, while the Renault Trafic Transporter takes 10.8 s. That’s about 2.1 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Trafic Transporter delivers significantly more torque with 380 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 232 Nm more.

ZS

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Seats: Renault Trafic Transporter offers more seats – 6 vs 5.

In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is noticeably lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,848 kg. The difference is around 518 kg.

When it comes to payload, the Renault Trafic Transporter carries considerably more – 1,222 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 752 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Renault Trafic Transporter shows a few small advantages in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,100
Trafic Transporter

Renault Trafic Transporter

  • Engine Type Electric, Diesel
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 122 - 170 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 6.8 - 7 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 21.2 - 22.2 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 240 - 318 km
details

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …
MG ZS
Nissan Juke
VS
Comparing the MG ZS and the Nissan Juke pits a practical, value-oriented small SUV (the MG ZS) against a more stylised, compact crossover with sharper driving character (the Nissan Juke). This quick guide highlights how they differ in space, equipment, engines and running costs so you can pick the …
MG ZS
Renault Trafic Transporter

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG ZS

The MG ZS is a compact crossover that delivers strong value with a roomy cabin and straightforward tech, making it a sensible choice for budget-minded buyers. It’s easy to live with, offering comfortable rides and a practical layout that suits daily commutes and family errands.

details
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-07
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-21
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-luxury_interior
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-16

Reviews MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
Constantin
9 Jun 2026, 22:34:01

I replaced my Dacia Jogger with an MG ZS Hybrid and I don't regret it.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ahmed
30 Sept 2025, 14:05:11

With all the features it offers at that price, the MG has no competition. A BMW X1 of similar dimensions with a few extra upgrades costs more than twice as much, and considering that 40% of MG’s spare parts come from Germany (Bosch, Continental, etc.), I’d go for the MG ZS Hybrid without a second thought.

Renault Trafic Transporter

The Renault Trafic is a practical, workhorse transporter that hides thoughtful cabin comfort behind a tough, utilitarian exterior, so you can tackle a busy week without sacrificing sanity. It’s a sensible choice for buyers who want reliability and clever flexibility rather than flash, with just enough character to make daily hauling feel less like a chore.

details
serpimg_zzYFEX

Reviews Renault Trafic Transporter

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

MG ZS
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The MG ZS and the Toyota Yaris Cross are two popular compact crossovers aimed at buyers who want SUV styling without big running costs. The ZS undercuts with strong equipment and roomy cabin for the money, while the Yaris Cross prioritises refinement, hybrid efficiency and Toyota’s proven …
Dacia Duster
MG ZS
VS
The Dacia Duster and MG ZS are two practical, budget-friendly compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want more space and a higher driving position without premium prices. This comparison will help you decide whether the Duster’s rugged simplicity and low running costs or the ZS’s sharper styling and …
Ford Puma
MG ZS
VS
Choosing between the Ford Puma and the MG ZS comes down to whether you prioritise driving dynamics and refinement or space and value. The Puma is a compact, agile crossover with sharper handling, a more upmarket cabin and peppy engines, while the MG ZS trades sportiness for generous interior space, …
Kia Sportage
MG ZS
VS
The Kia Sportage and MG ZS are compact SUVs aimed at buyers who want practical, everyday family transport—each offers a different mix of comfort, technology and value. This quick comparison shows how the Sportage’s more refined ride and stronger engine choices compare with the ZS’s budget-friendly …
MG ZS
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …
Ford Kuga
MG ZS
VS
The Ford Kuga and MG ZS are compact SUVs that both promise practicality and value, but they target different priorities: the Kuga leans toward sharper handling, a more refined cabin and a wider range of powertrains, while the ZS focuses on affordability and simple, roomy practicality. Choose the …
Citroen C3 Aircross
MG ZS
VS
Citroen C3 Aircross and MG ZS go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Citroen C3 Aircross or …
MG ZS
Opel Frontera
VS
The MG ZS offers a modern, urban-friendly design and a tech-savvy interior, making it a comfortable and efficient choice for city driving. In contrast, the Vauxhall Frontera is renowned for its ruggedness and off-road capability, ideal for adventurous journeys on challenging terrains. While the MG …
MG ZS
Renault Trafic Transporter

Costs and Consumption
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
Price
38,100 - 43,500 £
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 7 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
21.2 - 22.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
240 - 318 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
115 - 145 g/km
co2
0 - 184 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
Cargo Van
Seats
5
Seats
3 - 6
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
Curb weight
1,848 - 2,075 kg
Trunk capacity
443 L
Trunk capacity
-
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,818 mm
Width
1,956 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
375 - 470 kg
Payload
899 - 1,222 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Power HP
122 - 170 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.8 - 13.6 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
148 Nm
Torque
245 - 380 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Power kW
90 - 125 kW
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, G
Brand
MG
Brand
Renault
What drive types are available for the MG ZS?

The MG ZS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.