VS

MG ZS vs VW T-Roc comparison

Compare performance (197 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (18,000 £ vs 26,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MG ZS or VW T-Roc?

MG ZS vs VW T-Roc: Key differences

MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • noticeably more power
  • very slightly more efficient
  • barely quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter
details

VW T-Roc

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • marginally more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

ZS

MG ZS vs VW T-Roc: A Comprehensive Comparison of Two Compelling SUVs

In the ever-evolving automotive landscape, two models stand out in the compact SUV segment: the MG ZS and the VW T-Roc. While MG has made significant strides in establishing itself as a formidable contender with its electric and hybrid options, VW's T-Roc continues to impress with its versatile engine choices and refinement. This article delves into their specifications, performance attributes, and innovative features, allowing potential buyers to make an informed decision.

T-Roc

Engine Options and Performance

The MG ZS presents an attractive lineup featuring both electric and hybrid configurations. With a power output ranging from 156 HP to an impressive 197 HP, drivers can choose between a full electric variant with a range of up to 440 km and a hybrid model that focuses on fuel efficiency and low emissions. The ZS boasts a respectable acceleration of 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.6 seconds, coupled with a top speed of 175 km/h.

On the other hand, the VW T-Roc caters to a broader audience by offering petrol and diesel engines, with power outputs ranging from 115 HP to a staggering 300 HP in the high-performance R variant. Acceleration figures vary, with some versions reaching 100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds, showcasing the T-Roc's sporty potential. The T-Roc's top speed can reach up to 250 km/h, making it not just an eco-friendly SUV but also a thrilling ride.

ZS

Transmission and Fuel Efficiency

The MG ZS is equipped with an automatic transmission that includes both a reduction gearbox and an automatic gearbox, ensuring a smooth driving experience with commendable fuel consumption rates of approximately 5 L/100 km for the hybrid version. The electric variant, on the other hand, has an energy consumption of around 17.3 kWh/100 km, emphasizing its eco-friendly credentials.

The VW T-Roc, meanwhile, offers a choice between manual and automatic transmissions, with dual-clutch options available for sportier performance. Fuel consumption varies based on the engine choice, with efficient diesel engines returning as low as 4.7 L/100 km, while high-performance petrol versions consume up to 8.5 L/100 km under more demanding driving conditions.

T-Roc

Innovative Technologies and Features

When it comes to technology, the MG ZS keeps pace with modern expectations, featuring a user-friendly infotainment system that supports smartphone connectivity. Safety features abound in the ZS, with advanced driver-assistance systems enhancing peace of mind on the road.

The VW T-Roc, however, takes the lead in terms of tech advancements and premium features. Its cutting-edge digital cockpit provides customizable displays for a modern touch. The T-Roc is also equipped with numerous advanced safety features, such as lane assist, adaptive cruise control, and more, ensuring an all-round excellent driving experience.

ZS

Dimensions and Practicality

In terms of size, the MG ZS measures 4323 mm in length and 1809 mm in width, providing ample cabin space for five occupants and a trunk capacity of 448 liters. This makes it a practical choice for families and individuals requiring versatility.

The T-Roc, slightly longer at 4236 mm, offers a more refined and spacious cabin with options for both five- and four-seat configurations. The boot space ranges from 392 to 445 liters, providing slightly less than the ZS but still a practical solution for everyday use.

T-Roc

Final Verdict: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

Ultimately, the choice between the MG ZS and the VW T-Roc will depend on individual preferences. The MG ZS excels with its electric and hybrid options, appealing to environmentally conscious drivers seeking cost-effective urban transportation. In contrast, the VW T-Roc impresses with its extensive range of engines, technological innovations, and superior driving dynamics, catering to those craving both comfort and performance.

Whichever SUV you choose, both models promise to deliver in terms of value, performance, and practicality, making them ideal contenders in the fiercely competitive SUV market.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Kamiq
VW T-Roc
VS
Choosing between the Skoda Kamiq and the VW T‑Roc comes down to whether you prioritise everyday practicality and value or a bolder, slightly sportier compact SUV. Both share similar underpinnings, but the Kamiq excels in interior space and efficiency while the T‑Roc offers sharper styling and a …
MG ZS
Omoda 5
VS
The MG ZS and Omoda 5 are two popular compact SUVs that target value-conscious buyers with generous equipment and modern styling. This comparison cuts through the marketing to show how they differ in interior space, build quality, driving dynamics and running costs so you can pick the one that fits …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ZS

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

MG ZS is clearly cheaper – starting at 18,000 £ , while the VW T-Roc costs 26,400 £ . That’s a price difference of around 8,447 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the MG ZS uses 5.1 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.5 L/100km. The difference is about 0.4 L/100km.

T-Roc

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS offers noticeably more power – delivering 197 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 47 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG ZS is barely quicker – completing the sprint in 8.7 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.9 s. That’s about 0.2 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the VW T-Roc delivers substantially more torque with 250 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 102 Nm more.

ZS

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, MG ZS is somewhat lighter – 1,330 kg compared to 1,465 kg. The difference is around 135 kg.

Looking at boot space, the VW T-Roc offers marginally more boot space – 475 L compared to 443 L. That’s a difference of about 32 L.

When it comes to payload, the VW T-Roc carries very slightly more – 515 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 45 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MG ZS stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £18,000
ZS

MG ZS

  • Engine Type Petrol, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 116 - 197 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
details
MG ZS
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MG ZS

The MG ZS is a compact crossover that delivers strong value with a roomy cabin and straightforward tech, making it a sensible choice for budget-minded buyers. It’s easy to live with, offering comfortable rides and a practical layout that suits daily commutes and family errands.

details
MG-ZS-EV-dynamic
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-07
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-21
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-luxury_interior
MG-ZS-EV-PRESS-16

Reviews MG ZS

4.5 (5 Reviews)
rate
Constantin
9 Jun 2026, 22:34:01

I replaced my Dacia Jogger with an MG ZS Hybrid and I don't regret it.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Ahmed
30 Sept 2025, 14:05:11

With all the features it offers at that price, the MG has no competition. A BMW X1 of similar dimensions with a few extra upgrades costs more than twice as much, and considering that 40% of MG’s spare parts come from Germany (Bosch, Continental, etc.), I’d go for the MG ZS Hybrid without a second thought.

VW T-Roc

The Volkswagen T‑Roc is a stylish, well-proportioned crossover that blends hatchback agility with SUV presence. It delivers a comfortable cabin, user-friendly tech and a composed ride, making it a sensible choice for buyers who want practicality with a bit of character.

details
DB2025AU01832_medium
DB2025AU01833_medium
DB2025AU01840_medium
DB2025AU01844_medium
DB2025AU01835_medium
DB2025AU01866_medium
DB2025AU01834_medium
DB2025AU01852_medium

Reviews VW T-Roc

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
Ester
17 Sept 2025, 14:29:41

I've been driving the VW T‑Roc for a few months now and I'm totally satisfied. 🚗 The higher seating position gives me a great feeling of security and the visibility in city traffic is excellent. I especially like the modern infotainment system — everything works intuitively and quickly. On the motorway it feels very calm and stable, even at higher speeds. Overall a great car that's a lot of fun and still economical.

Frequently compared as well

VW Golf
VW T-Roc
VS
Deciding between the VW Golf and the VW T‑Roc is about choosing whether you prefer a classic, driver-focused hatchback or a compact SUV with higher ride height and added practicality. The Golf delivers sharper handling and refined efficiency, while the T‑Roc brings more interior space and a more …
Nissan Qashqai
VW T-Roc
VS
The Nissan Qashqai is the sensible, family-friendly compact SUV — roomy, quietly comfortable and packed with practical tech for long motorway miles. The VW T-Roc swaps a little rear-seat space for cheeky styling and sharper handling, so if you want personality and a bit more driver engagement it’s …
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
The SEAT Ateca and the VW T‑Roc are two closely related compact crossover SUVs from the Volkswagen Group, each offering a blend of practicality, comfort and engaging driving manners. This comparison will highlight where the Ateca’s straightforward value and roomy practicality differ from the …
Lexus LBX
VW T-Roc
VS
The Lexus LBX feels like a posh city cocoon — whisper-quiet, well-stitched and leaning into hybrid efficiency and premium touches — while the VW T‑Roc is a cheeky, practical all-rounder that drives with more snap, offers more space and gives better value for the money. Choose the LBX if you want …
Audi A3 Sportback
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi A3 Sportback and the VW T‑Roc share many Volkswagen Group underpinnings but target different buyers: the A3 Sportback focuses on refined driving dynamics and premium cabin quality, while the VW T‑Roc offers a taller, more practical crossover package at a more value-driven price. This …
Ford Kuga
VW T-Roc
VS
In the compact-SUV ring, the Ford Kuga and the VW T‑Roc step up: one leans on family-friendly practicality and hybrid efficiency, the other on sharp styling and city-ready agility. We’ll compare space, economy, driving feel and value so you can choose whether you want sensible muscle or fashionable …
SEAT Arona
VW T-Roc
VS
Sibling rivalry in compact-SUV clothing: the SEAT Arona and VW T‑Roc go head-to-head — one brings Spanish spice and value, the other German polish and refinement. We’ll compare driving feel, practicality, tech and running costs so you can pick the compact crossover that deserves a spot in your …
MG ZS
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Cheap and cheerful, the MG ZS punches above its price with a roomy, gadget-heavy cabin and surprisingly sprightly electric options, while the Nissan Qashqai feels more grown-up — quieter, better driven and tougher to fault on long motorway runs. Pick the ZS if you want maximum kit for your money; …
MG ZS
VW T-Roc

Costs and Consumption
Price
18,000 - 24,000 £
Price
26,400 - 38,600 £
Consumption L/100km
5.1 - 6.5 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
115 - 145 g/km
co2
126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,330 - 1,420 kg
Curb weight
1,465 - 1,539 kg
Trunk capacity
443 L
Trunk capacity
284 - 475 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,818 mm
Width
1,811 - 1,828 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
375 - 470 kg
Payload
368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
148 Nm
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1,495 - 1,498 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,498 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, C
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
MG
Brand
VW
What drive types are available for the MG ZS?

The MG ZS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.