@ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
@ Volkswagen AG / VW Media
VS

MG ZS vs VW T-Roc – Performance, range & efficiency compared

Both models have their strengths – but which one suits you more?
Compare performance, efficiency, price and space directly: MG ZS or VW T-Roc?

ZS @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

MG ZS vs VW T-Roc: A Comprehensive Comparison of Two Compelling SUVs

In the ever-evolving automotive landscape, two models stand out in the compact SUV segment: the MG ZS and the VW T-Roc. While MG has made significant strides in establishing itself as a formidable contender with its electric and hybrid options, VW's T-Roc continues to impress with its versatile engine choices and refinement. This article delves into their specifications, performance attributes, and innovative features, allowing potential buyers to make an informed decision.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Engine Options and Performance

The MG ZS presents an attractive lineup featuring both electric and hybrid configurations. With a power output ranging from 156 HP to an impressive 197 HP, drivers can choose between a full electric variant with a range of up to 440 km and a hybrid model that focuses on fuel efficiency and low emissions. The ZS boasts a respectable acceleration of 0-100 km/h in as little as 8.6 seconds, coupled with a top speed of 175 km/h.

On the other hand, the VW T-Roc caters to a broader audience by offering petrol and diesel engines, with power outputs ranging from 115 HP to a staggering 300 HP in the high-performance R variant. Acceleration figures vary, with some versions reaching 100 km/h in just 4.9 seconds, showcasing the T-Roc's sporty potential. The T-Roc's top speed can reach up to 250 km/h, making it not just an eco-friendly SUV but also a thrilling ride.

ZS @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

Transmission and Fuel Efficiency

The MG ZS is equipped with an automatic transmission that includes both a reduction gearbox and an automatic gearbox, ensuring a smooth driving experience with commendable fuel consumption rates of approximately 5 L/100 km for the hybrid version. The electric variant, on the other hand, has an energy consumption of around 17.3 kWh/100 km, emphasizing its eco-friendly credentials.

The VW T-Roc, meanwhile, offers a choice between manual and automatic transmissions, with dual-clutch options available for sportier performance. Fuel consumption varies based on the engine choice, with efficient diesel engines returning as low as 4.7 L/100 km, while high-performance petrol versions consume up to 8.5 L/100 km under more demanding driving conditions.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Innovative Technologies and Features

When it comes to technology, the MG ZS keeps pace with modern expectations, featuring a user-friendly infotainment system that supports smartphone connectivity. Safety features abound in the ZS, with advanced driver-assistance systems enhancing peace of mind on the road.

The VW T-Roc, however, takes the lead in terms of tech advancements and premium features. Its cutting-edge digital cockpit provides customizable displays for a modern touch. The T-Roc is also equipped with numerous advanced safety features, such as lane assist, adaptive cruise control, and more, ensuring an all-round excellent driving experience.

ZS @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

Dimensions and Practicality

In terms of size, the MG ZS measures 4323 mm in length and 1809 mm in width, providing ample cabin space for five occupants and a trunk capacity of 448 liters. This makes it a practical choice for families and individuals requiring versatility.

The T-Roc, slightly longer at 4236 mm, offers a more refined and spacious cabin with options for both five- and four-seat configurations. The boot space ranges from 392 to 445 liters, providing slightly less than the ZS but still a practical solution for everyday use.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Final Verdict: Which SUV Reigns Supreme?

Ultimately, the choice between the MG ZS and the VW T-Roc will depend on individual preferences. The MG ZS excels with its electric and hybrid options, appealing to environmentally conscious drivers seeking cost-effective urban transportation. In contrast, the VW T-Roc impresses with its extensive range of engines, technological innovations, and superior driving dynamics, catering to those craving both comfort and performance.

Whichever SUV you choose, both models promise to deliver in terms of value, performance, and practicality, making them ideal contenders in the fiercely competitive SUV market.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ZS @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

MG ZS has a significantly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 18000 £, while the VW T-Roc costs 26400 £. That’s a price difference of around 8447 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: MG ZS manages with 5 L and is therefore hardly perceptible more efficient than the VW T-Roc with 5.50 L. The difference is about 0.50 L per 100 km.

T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the MG ZS has a distinct edge – offering 197 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 47 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the MG ZS is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 8.70 s, while the VW T-Roc takes 8.90 s. That’s about 0.20 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the VW T-Roc performs a bit better – reaching 212 km/h, while the MG ZS tops out at 179 km/h. The difference is around 33 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: VW T-Roc pulls decisively stronger with 250 Nm compared to 148 Nm. That’s about 102 Nm difference.

ZS @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, MG ZS is somewhat lighter – 1330 kg compared to 1465 kg. The difference is around 135 kg.

In terms of boot space, the VW T-Roc offers slight more room – 475 L compared to 443 L. That’s a difference of about 32 L.

In maximum load capacity, the MG ZS performs slight better – up to 1457 L, which is about 107 L more than the VW T-Roc.

When it comes to payload, VW T-Roc hardly perceptible takes the win – 515 kg compared to 470 kg. That’s a difference of about 45 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the MG ZS shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £18,000
ZS @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation

MG ZS

  • Engine Type : Full Hybrid, Petrol
  • Transmission : Automatic, Manuel
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 197 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5 - 6.5 L

MG ZS

5 (1)
rate

The MG ZS arrives as a cheeky and practical choice for shoppers who want SUV style and family-friendly space without blowing the budget. It may not pretend to be premium, but with sensible equipment, easy-to-live-with driving manners and surprising value, it makes a persuasive case for anyone after sensible transport with a bit of personality.

details

VW T-Roc

5 (2)
rate

The VW T-Roc mixes cheeky, coupe-like styling with the everyday sense and space of an SUV, so it looks fun without sacrificing family sense. It’s a likeable all-rounder with tidy road manners and plenty of personality, ideal if you want a car that’s practical enough for chores but entertaining enough to enjoy.

details
MG ZS
VW T-Roc
ZS @ MG Motor / SAIC Motor Corporation
T-Roc @ Volkswagen AG / VW Media

Costs and Consumption

Price
18000 - 24000 £
Price
26400 - 38000 £
Consumption L/100km
5 - 6.5 L
Consumption L/100km
5.5 - 6.3 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
113 - 145 g/km
co2
126 - 143 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
41 - 55 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body

Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
4 - 5
Doors
5
Doors
2 - 5
Curb weight
1330 - 1420 kg
Curb weight
1465 - 1539 kg
Trunk capacity
443 L
Trunk capacity
284 - 475 L
Length
4430 mm
Length
4271 - 4373 mm
Width
1818 mm
Width
1811 - 1828 mm
Height
1635 mm
Height
1527 - 1573 mm
Max trunk capacity
1457 L
Max trunk capacity
1350 L
Payload
375 - 470 kg
Payload
368 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance

Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
116 - 197 HP
Power HP
115 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.7 - 12.5 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Max Speed
168 - 179 km/h
Max Speed
187 - 212 km/h
Torque
148 Nm
Torque
200 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
85 - 145 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
1495 - 1498 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General

Model Year
2024 - 2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
MG
Brand
VW
What drive types are available for the MG ZS?

The MG ZS is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.