Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
MINI Aceman vs Abarth 600 comparison
Compare performance (258 HP vs 280 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 38,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MINI Aceman or Abarth 600?
MINI Aceman vs Abarth 600: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Aceman
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
MINI Aceman is clearly cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Abarth 600 costs 38,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 11,562 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the MINI Aceman is clearly more efficient: consuming 14.1 kWh/100km compared to 17.5 kWh/100km for the Abarth 600. That’s a difference of about 3.4 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the MINI Aceman offers barely more range – reaching up to 355 km, about 11 km more than the Abarth 600.
600
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Abarth 600 offers very slightly more power – delivering 280 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 22 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Abarth 600 is very slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.9 s, while the MINI Aceman takes 6.4 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.
There’s no difference in top speed – both reach 200 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: the MINI Aceman delivers barely more torque with 350 Nm compared to 345 Nm. That’s about 5 Nm more.
Aceman
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Abarth 600 is barely lighter – 1,700 kg compared to 1,720 kg. The difference is around 20 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Abarth 600 offers a bit more boot space – 360 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 60 L.
For maximum load capacity, the Abarth 600 offers a bit more capacity – up to 1,231 L, about 226 L more than the MINI Aceman.
When it comes to payload, the MINI Aceman carries clearly more – 530 kg compared to 225 kg. That’s a difference of about 305 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The MINI Aceman is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £27,000
MINI Aceman
MINI Aceman
Abarth 600
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
MINI Aceman
The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.
details
Abarth 600
The sleek and stylish 600 has captured the hearts of both casual drivers and automotive enthusiasts alike. With its retro charm and modern features, this model seamlessly blends classic design with contemporary performance. Whether navigating city streets or embarking on a weekend adventure, the 600 offers a driving experience that is both fun and memorable.
details
MINI Aceman
Abarth 600
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,000 - 36,200 £
|
Price
38,600 - 39,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.5 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
|
Electric Range
344 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
49.2 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
51 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
|
Curb weight
1,700 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
Trunk capacity
360 L
|
|
Length
4,079 mm
|
Length
4,187 mm
|
|
Width
1,754 mm
|
Width
1,779 mm
|
|
Height
1,514 mm
|
Height
1,557 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,005 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1,231 L
|
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Payload
225 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
Power HP
237 - 280 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.9 - 6.2 s
|
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
345 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
Power kW
174 - 207 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
MINI
|
Brand
Abarth
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.