Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
MINI Aceman vs Lynk & Co 02 - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (258 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (25500 £ vs 30900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MINI Aceman or Lynk & Co 02?
Aceman
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
MINI Aceman has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 25500 £ , while the Lynk & Co 02 costs 30900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5395 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the MINI Aceman: with 14 kWh per 100 km, it’s evident more efficient than the Lynk & Co 02 with 17.10 kWh. That’s a difference of about 3.10 kWh.
As for electric range, the Lynk & Co 02 performs hardly perceptible better – achieving up to 445 km, about 40 km more than the MINI Aceman.
Aceman
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 02 has a barely noticeable edge – offering 272 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 14 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lynk & Co 02 is slightly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.50 s, while the MINI Aceman takes 6.40 s. That’s about 0.90 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the MINI Aceman performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Lynk & Co 02 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: MINI Aceman pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 350 Nm compared to 323 Nm. That’s about 27 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Aceman
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, MINI Aceman is a bit lighter – 1720 kg compared to 1895 kg. The difference is around 175 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Lynk & Co 02 offers distinct more room – 410 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 110 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Lynk & Co 02 performs noticeable better – up to 1349 L, which is about 344 L more than the MINI Aceman.
When it comes to payload, MINI Aceman noticeable takes the win – 530 kg compared to 375 kg. That’s a difference of about 155 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The MINI Aceman has only a minor advantage in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
MINI Aceman
Lynk & Co 02
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £25,500
MINI Aceman
MINI Aceman
4.6 (1 Reviews)
The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.
details
Lynk & Co 02
5 (1 Reviews)
The Lynk & Co 02 wears its attitude like a leather jacket—bold styling and a youthful cabin that punches above its class, appealing to buyers who want personality as well as practicality. It's a genuinely engaging compact with everyday usability, offering enough flair and refinement to stand out in a crowded market without trying too hard.
details
MINI Aceman
Lynk & Co 02
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
25500 - 36200 £
|
Price
30900 - 34300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14 - 16 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.1 - 17.6 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
303 - 405 km
|
Electric Range
435 - 445 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
38.5 - 49.2 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1720 - 1825 kg
|
Curb weight
1895 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
Trunk capacity
410 L
|
|
Length
4079 mm
|
Length
4460 mm
|
|
Width
1754 mm
|
Width
1845 mm
|
|
Height
1514 mm
|
Height
1573 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1005 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1349 L
|
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Payload
375 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
Power HP
272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.50 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 - 200 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
323 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
Power kW
200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
MINI
|
Brand
Lynk & Co
|
Is the MINI Aceman offered with different drivetrains?
The MINI Aceman is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.