Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
MINI Aceman vs Lynk & Co 02 comparison
Compare performance (258 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 30,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MINI Aceman or Lynk & Co 02?
MINI Aceman vs Lynk & Co 02: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Aceman
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
MINI Aceman is a bit cheaper – starting at 27,000 £ , while the Lynk & Co 02 costs 30,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 3,852 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the MINI Aceman is clearly more efficient: consuming 14.1 kWh/100km compared to 17.1 kWh/100km for the Lynk & Co 02. That’s a difference of about 3 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Lynk & Co 02 offers clearly more range – reaching up to 445 km, about 90 km more than the MINI Aceman.
02
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.
When it comes to engine power, the Lynk & Co 02 offers very slightly more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 258 HP. That’s roughly 14 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Lynk & Co 02 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 5.5 s, while the MINI Aceman takes 6.4 s. That’s about 0.9 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the MINI Aceman delivers only slightly more torque with 350 Nm compared to 323 Nm. That’s about 27 Nm more.
Aceman
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, MINI Aceman is slightly lighter – 1,720 kg compared to 1,895 kg. The difference is around 175 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Lynk & Co 02 offers markedly more boot space – 410 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 110 L.
When it comes to payload, the MINI Aceman carries clearly more – 530 kg compared to 375 kg. That’s a difference of about 155 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The MINI Aceman is barely ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £27,000
MINI Aceman
MINI Aceman
Lynk & Co 02
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
MINI Aceman
The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.
details
Lynk & Co 02
The Lynk & Co 02 wears its attitude like a leather jacket—bold styling and a youthful cabin that punches above its class, appealing to buyers who want personality as well as practicality. It's a genuinely engaging compact with everyday usability, offering enough flair and refinement to stand out in a crowded market without trying too hard.
details
MINI Aceman
Lynk & Co 02
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
27,000 - 36,400 £
|
Price
30,900 - 34,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.1 - 17.6 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
|
Electric Range
435 - 445 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
|
Curb weight
1,895 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
300 L
|
Trunk capacity
410 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,754 mm
|
Width
1,845 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
450 - 530 kg
|
Payload
375 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
|
Power HP
272 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
|
Torque
323 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
|
Power kW
200 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2024
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
MINI
|
Brand
Lynk & Co
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.