VS

MINI Aceman vs Nissan Juke comparison

Compare performance (258 HP vs 143 HP), boot space and price (27,000 £ vs 21,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – MINI Aceman or Nissan Juke?

MINI Aceman vs Nissan Juke: Key differences

MINI Aceman

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • substantially more power
  • considerably quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly cheaper
  • visibly lighter
  • visibly more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Aceman

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Nissan Juke is clearly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the MINI Aceman costs 27,000 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5,615 £.

Juke

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the MINI Aceman offers substantially more power – delivering 258 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 115 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the MINI Aceman is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 6.4 s, while the Nissan Juke takes 10.1 s. That’s about 3.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the MINI Aceman delivers significantly more torque with 350 Nm compared to 200 Nm. That’s about 150 Nm more.

Aceman

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Nissan Juke is visibly lighter – 1,274 kg compared to 1,720 kg. The difference is around 446 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Nissan Juke offers visibly more boot space – 422 L compared to 300 L. That’s a difference of about 122 L.

When it comes to payload, the MINI Aceman carries somewhat more – 530 kg compared to 427 kg. That’s a difference of about 103 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The MINI Aceman is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £27,000
Aceman

MINI Aceman

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 184 - 258 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 309 - 355 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Nissan Juke
Opel Mokka
VS
The Nissan Juke is a cheeky, compact crossover with bulging arches, zesty handling and personality to spare, while the Opel Mokka takes a more grown-up route — solid, spacious and quietly efficient with a neater cabin and calmer ride. Pick the Juke if you want to stand out and have fun on twisty …
MINI Aceman
MINI Countryman
VS
Comparing the MINI Aceman and the MINI Countryman helps you decide between a compact, city-focused crossover and a roomier, more practical small SUV. The Aceman prioritises agile handling, crisp urban packaging and striking style, while the Countryman brings more interior space, versatile cargo …
MINI Aceman
Nissan Juke

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

MINI Aceman

The MINI Aceman squeezes classic MINI charm into a sharper, more crossover-ready shape, trading some of the old curves for grown-up practicality while keeping the wink-and-grin personality buyers crave. Inside it's a surprisingly premium, customizable cabin that feels clever rather than cluttered, and on the road the Aceman is eager and nimble — ideal for city dwellers who want an SUV silhouette with proper fun behind the wheel.

details
P90545616_highRes_mini-aceman-se-04-20
P90545628_highRes_mini-aceman-se-04-20
P90547839_highRes_the-new-mini-aceman-

Reviews MINI Aceman

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
GEORGXRM
5 Jan 2026, 00:44:07

Amazing interior, sporty-funky exterior, great handles, good amount of power.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): City / Short distance
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Nissan Juke

The Nissan Juke is a pocket-sized crossover that refuses to blend in, with quirky styling and a cheeky stance that turns heads at every traffic light. It’s ideal for shoppers who value personality and nimble urban driving over maximum practicality, delivering surprising pep and a well-equipped feel for everyday fun.

details
Fahraufnahmen (7)
Exterieur statisch (2)
Exterieur statisch (12)
Interieur (25)

Reviews Nissan Juke

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Ali Shan
8 Dec 2025, 11:29:27

For more space and Efficiency, I would prefer Juke 1.5 Specially Accenta.

Frequently compared as well

MINI Aceman
VW ID.3
VS
The MINI Aceman and the Volkswagen ID.3 offer two distinct takes on the compact electric car: the Aceman leans on MINI’s character and driver-focused feel, while the ID.3 emphasizes efficiency, roomy interior and everyday practicality. This comparison will cut through the specs to show where they …
Dacia Sandero
Nissan Juke
VS
The Dacia Sandero and Nissan Juke both aim at buyers wanting compact, city-friendly cars, but they take very different approaches: the Sandero focuses on affordability and practical simplicity, while the Juke leans into distinctive styling and a more dynamic feel. This comparison will help you …
Nissan Juke
Renault Clio
VS
Choosing between the Juke and the Clio comes down to whether you want a compact crossover with bold styling and a higher driving position or a polished, practical hatchback focused on everyday usability. If you prioritise standout looks and a more commanding ride go for the Juke; if you want …
Ford Focus
Nissan Juke
VS
The Ford Focus and the Nissan Juke take very different approaches to the compact segment: the Focus focuses on balanced driving dynamics, practicality and refined handling, while the Juke trades conventional packaging for bold styling, higher ride height and city-friendly presence. Choose the Focus …
Hyundai Kona
Nissan Juke
VS
The Kona and the Juke are two of the most popular subcompact crossovers, each standing out with bold styling and a city-friendly footprint. This quick comparison looks at how the Kona and Juke stack up on comfort, practicality, performance and running costs so you can decide which suits your needs.
Nissan Juke
Peugeot 2008
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Nissan Juke and Peugeot 2008 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving experiences. The Juke offers a sportier edge with its agile handling and bold styling, while the 2008 impresses with a refined interior and advanced technology …
Dacia Duster
Nissan Juke
VS
Dacia Duster and Nissan Juke go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice. || Unsure whether the Dacia Duster or the …
MINI Aceman
Renault R5
VS
The MINI Aceman feels like a posh city rocket — cheeky handling, premium finishes and a slick interior make it the choice for drivers who want style and go‑kart fun wrapped in crossover practicality. The Renault 5, by contrast, pares back the flash for retro charm, more usable space and a …
MINI Aceman
Nissan Juke

Costs and Consumption
Price
27,000 - 36,400 £
Price
21,400 - 30,100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
4.7 - 6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.1 - 16 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
309 - 355 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
105 - 136 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,720 - 1,825 kg
Curb weight
1,274 - 1,405 kg
Trunk capacity
300 L
Trunk capacity
354 - 422 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,754 mm
Width
1,800 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
450 - 530 kg
Payload
405 - 427 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
184 - 258 HP
Power HP
114 - 143 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.4 - 7.9 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.1 - 11.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
290 - 350 Nm
Torque
200 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
135 - 190 kW
Power kW
84 - 105 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
999 - 1,598 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, C
Brand
MINI
Brand
Nissan
What drive types are available for the MINI Aceman?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.