VS

Mitsubishi ASX vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 269 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 43,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi ASX or Land Rover Range Rover Evoque?

Mitsubishi ASX vs Land Rover Range Rover Evoque: Key differences

Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly cheaper
  • visibly lighter
  • barely more trunk space

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

1.4 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • significantly more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ASX

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.

Mitsubishi ASX is significantly cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque costs 43,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 21,865 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque uses 3.7 L/100km and is somewhat more efficient than the Mitsubishi ASX with 4.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.7 L/100km.

Range Rover Evoque

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque offers significantly more power – delivering 269 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 111 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.2 s, while the Mitsubishi ASX takes 8.9 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque delivers clearly more torque with 540 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 295 Nm more.

ASX

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is visibly lighter – 1,296 kg compared to 1,792 kg. The difference is around 496 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mitsubishi ASX offers barely more boot space – 484 L compared to 472 L. That’s a difference of about 12 L.

When it comes to payload, the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque carries clearly more – 600 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 155 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Land Rover Range Rover Evoque holds a decisive overall lead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £43,300
Range Rover Evoque

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 160 - 269 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 60 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Jaguar F-Pace
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
In the competitive landscape of luxury SUVs, the Jaguar F-Pace and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque stand out with their distinctive blend of style and performance. The F-Pace impresses with its athletic handling and spacious interior, while the Evoque captivates with its rugged charm and advanced …
Mercedes GLC
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
The Mercedes GLC and the Range Rover Evoque present a compelling choice for luxury SUV enthusiasts. The GLC is renowned for its blend of comfort, technology, and efficient performance, making it an excellent option for those who prioritize a smooth driving experience. On the other hand, the Evoque …
Mitsubishi ASX
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi ASX

The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.

details
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_front_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_rear_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_interior_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_Overview-Trunk_open_low

Reviews Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

The Range Rover Evoque turns heads with a compact, sculpted silhouette and an interior that feels more boutique hotel than utility vehicle. It delivers composed, playful handling around town while keeping enough ruggedness for weekend escapes — perfect for buyers who want luxury without the ostentation.

details
RR_EVQ_20MY_Dynamic_ND_221118_02_big
067rrevq20mysilverdynamic045
Range Rover Evoque Plug-In Hybrid_MJ20jpg (15)
RR_EVQ_21MY_INTERIOR_260820_S44_03

Reviews Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

1.4 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Lexus NX
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
The Lexus NX and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mitsubishi ASX
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
In the competitive realm of compact crossovers, the Mitsubishi ASX and Suzuki S-Cross offer distinct value propositions for discerning buyers. The ASX impresses with its robust design and spacious interior, making it a practical choice for families and adventure seekers alike. Meanwhile, the Suzuki …
Mitsubishi ASX
Renault Captur
VS
In this exciting comparison between the Mitsubishi Outlander and the Renault Koleos, both models showcase their strengths in versatility and design. The Outlander impresses with its robust performance and spacious interior, making it an ideal choice for families and adventure seekers alike. …
Mitsubishi ASX
Suzuki Vitara
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Mitsubishi ASX and Suzuki Vitara stand out with their distinctive styling and practicality. While the ASX offers a spacious interior and a reputation for reliability, the Vitara impresses with its off-road capabilities and zippy handling. Ultimately, …
Mitsubishi ASX
Mitsubishi Grandis
VS
Mitsubishi ASX and Mitsubishi Grandis go head-to-head: compare performance, space, features and price in one quick overview to see which model suits your daily driving, budget and lifestyle better. A clear, side-by-side look helps you make the smarter choice.
Nissan Qashqai
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
Unsure whether the Nissan Qashqai or the Land Rover Range Rover Evoque is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
BMW iX3
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
The BMW iX3 and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Ford Explorer EV
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque
VS
The Ford Explorer EV and Land Rover Range Rover Evoque compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Mitsubishi ASX
Land Rover Range Rover Evoque

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,400 - 32,500 £
Price
43,300 - 64,800 £
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
3.7 - 7.8 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
60 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
99 - 137 g/km
co2
85 - 177 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,296 - 1,493 kg
Curb weight
1,792 - 2,157 kg
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
Trunk capacity
472 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,797 mm
Width
1,900 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
397 - 445 kg
Payload
503 - 600 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Power HP
160 - 269 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.2 - 10.3 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
190 - 245 Nm
Torque
260 - 540 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Power kW
118 - 198 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,998 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, F, B
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Land Rover
Is the Mitsubishi ASX offered with different drivetrains?

The Mitsubishi ASX is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.