VS

Mitsubishi ASX vs Volvo XC60 comparison

Compare performance (158 HP vs 455 HP), boot space and price (21,400 £ vs 49,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi ASX or Volvo XC60?

Mitsubishi ASX vs Volvo XC60: Key differences

Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • clearly lighter
  • only slightly more trunk space

Volvo XC60

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably more power
  • considerably more efficient
  • substantially quicker 0–100 km/h

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

ASX

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mitsubishi ASX is considerably cheaper – starting at 21,400 £ , while the Volvo XC60 costs 49,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 27,771 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Volvo XC60 uses 2.8 L/100km and is considerably more efficient than the Mitsubishi ASX with 4.4 L/100km. The difference is about 1.6 L/100km.

XC60

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo XC60 offers considerably more power – delivering 455 HP compared to 158 HP. That’s roughly 297 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo XC60 is substantially quicker – completing the sprint in 4.9 s, while the Mitsubishi ASX takes 8.9 s. That’s about 4 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo XC60 delivers significantly more torque with 709 Nm compared to 245 Nm. That’s about 464 Nm more.

ASX

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mitsubishi ASX is clearly lighter – 1,296 kg compared to 1,900 kg. The difference is around 604 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Mitsubishi ASX offers only slightly more boot space – 484 L compared to 483 L. That’s a difference of about 1 L.

When it comes to payload, the Volvo XC60 carries somewhat more – 550 kg compared to 445 kg. That’s a difference of about 105 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo XC60 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £49,200
XC60

Volvo XC60

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 250 - 455 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 74 - 82 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Toyota RAV4
Volvo XC60
VS
The Toyota RAV4 is the no-nonsense, go-anywhere compact SUV that scores on reliability, fuel economy and roomy practicality — ideal if you want low fuss, sensible running costs and maximum value. The Volvo XC60 swaps thrift for Scandinavian refinement, with a classier cabin, advanced safety tech …
Volvo XC60
Volvo EX60
VS
Meet the Volvo XC60 and the new Volvo EX60 — two mid‑size premium SUVs that look like cousins but drive like rivals, one rooted in combustion tradition and the other staking Volvo’s claim in the electric future. Which should you buy: the familiar, comfort-first XC60 that does everything reliably …
Mitsubishi ASX
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mitsubishi ASX

The Mitsubishi ASX is a compact crossover that mixes practicality with a no-nonsense personality, making it an easy choice for buyers who want sensible space without the showroom theatrics. It won't set your pulse racing, but its composed ride and user-friendly kit make it a dependable companion for daily errands and weekend escapes — reliable rather than flashy.

details
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_front_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_driving_rear_variation_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_PR-image_interior_low
23MY_ASX_PHEV_Instyle_Overview-Trunk_open_low

Reviews Mitsubishi ASX

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Volvo XC60

The Volvo XC60 blends Scandinavian calm with confident presence, offering a cabin that feels plush without shouting for attention. It’s a smart pick for buyers after a composed ride, clever practicality and thoughtful safety touches — it even makes running the family shuttle feel almost serene, which is a small miracle.

details
288147_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288143_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
288141_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_Thunder_Grey
294983_XC60_Recharge_interior
288179_Volvo_XC60_Recharge_T8_AWD_interior

Reviews Volvo XC60

4.8 (6 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Volvo XC60
VW Tiguan
VS
Volvo XC60 feels like a Scandinavian living room on wheels — plush, impeccably safe and polished — while the VW Tiguan is the sensible all-rounder: practical, cheaper to run and surprisingly sprightly in town. Choose the XC60 if you want refinement and tech-laden comfort; pick the Tiguan if you …
Volvo XC60
Lynk & Co 08
VS
In the ring, the Volvo XC60 plays the composed, safety-first professional — impeccably finished, quietly luxurious and smugly reliable — while the Lynk & Co 08 storms in with bold styling, slabs of tech and a value-for-money punch. If you want comforting refinement and resale security, pick the …
Honda CR-V
Volvo XC60
VS
In the battle of the crossovers, the Honda CR-V and the Volvo XC60 stand out with distinct personalities. The CR-V, known for its reliability and value, excels in practicality with a spacious interior and impressive fuel efficiency. On the other hand, the XC60's luxurious design and advanced safety …
Volvo V60
Volvo XC60
VS
The V60 is the sleek, driver-focused estate that rewards cornering with a lower centre of gravity and tidy practicality, ideal if you want sporty poise without shouting SUV. The XC60 lifts you up for easier access, more upright space and a confident road presence — perfect for families or anyone …
BMW iX3
Volvo XC60
VS
The BMW iX3 and Volvo XC60 compete for the top spot in your garage. See how both models differ in key areas like performance, running costs, interior space and technology. A fast, clear comparison helps you pick the one that fits your needs best.
Skoda Kodiaq
Volvo XC60
VS
If you need cavernous family practicality and bang-for-buck, the Škoda Kodiaq is the no-nonsense choice that swallows car seats and weekend kit without complaint; the Volvo XC60, meanwhile, seduces with Scandinavian calm, sharper tech and a quieter, more refined drive. Pick the Kodiaq for space and …
Peugeot 5008
Volvo XC60
VS
Unsure whether the Peugeot 5008 or the Volvo XC60 is the better match? Compare both models directly and discover differences in power, efficiency, comfort and value for money — all summarized in one easy view to support your decision.
Mazda CX-60
Volvo XC60
VS
In a head-to-head comparison between the Mazda CX-60 and the Volvo XC60, both vehicles offer distinct advantages that cater to different driving preferences. The CX-60 impresses with its dynamic handling and engaging driving experience, while the XC60 shines in terms of luxury and advanced safety …
Mitsubishi ASX
Volvo XC60

Costs and Consumption
Price
21,400 - 32,500 £
Price
49,200 - 75,100 £
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
2.8 - 7.5 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
74 - 82 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
99 - 137 g/km
co2
64 - 169 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
71 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
5
Curb weight
1,296 - 1,493 kg
Curb weight
1,900 - 2,150 kg
Trunk capacity
348 - 484 L
Trunk capacity
468 - 483 L
Length
-
Length
4,708 mm
Width
1,797 mm
Width
1,902 mm
Height
-
Height
1,655 mm
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
1,543 L
Payload
397 - 445 kg
Payload
510 - 550 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Plugin Hybrid
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
Power HP
250 - 455 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.9 - 6.9 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
180 km/h
Torque
190 - 245 Nm
Torque
350 - 709 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
Power kW
184 - 335 kW
Engine capacity
1,199 - 1,789 cm3
Engine capacity
1,969 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
F, B
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Volvo
Is the Mitsubishi ASX offered with different drivetrains?

The Mitsubishi ASX is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.