Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Mitsubishi Colt vs Renault Captur - Differences and prices compared
Compare performance (143 HP vs 158 HP), boot space and price (18200 £ vs 21100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Colt or Renault Captur?
Captur
Costs and Efficiency:
Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.
Mitsubishi Colt has a a bit advantage in terms of price – it starts at 18200 £ , while the Renault Captur costs 21100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 2966 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mitsubishi Colt manages with 4.20 L and is therefore barely noticeable more efficient than the Renault Captur with 4.40 L. The difference is about 0.20 L per 100 km.
Captur
Engine and Performance:
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Captur has a slight edge – offering 158 HP compared to 143 HP. That’s roughly 15 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Captur is hardly perceptible quicker – completing the sprint in 8.90 s, while the Mitsubishi Colt takes 9.30 s. That’s about 0.40 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Renault Captur performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Colt tops out at 174 km/h. The difference is around 6 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Renault Captur pulls distinct stronger with 265 Nm compared to 160 Nm. That’s about 105 Nm difference.
Ad · Affiliate
As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
Captur
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Mitsubishi Colt is to a small extent lighter – 1189 kg compared to 1323 kg. The difference is around 134 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Renault Captur offers slight more room – 422 L compared to 391 L. That’s a difference of about 31 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Renault Captur performs noticeable better – up to 1363 L, which is about 294 L more than the Mitsubishi Colt.
When it comes to payload, Renault Captur somewhat takes the win – 453 kg compared to 385 kg. That’s a difference of about 68 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Renault Captur sits well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
Mitsubishi Colt
Renault Captur
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
from about £21,100
Renault Captur
Mitsubishi Colt
The Mitsubishi Colt is a compact city hatch that blends sensible practicality with cheeky, no-nonsense styling, making it a confident companion for tight streets and daily errands. It may not be a playground for driving purists, but its easy-to-live-with manners, modest running costs and surprisingly roomy cabin make it a smart, sensible pick for urban buyers who value reliability over showmanship.
detailsRenault Captur
5 (3 Reviews)
The Renault Captur is a cheeky little crossover that pairs city-friendly agility with a roomy, well-thought-out cabin and enough style to turn heads at the lights. It’s a sensible choice for buyers who want practical versatility and a dash of personality on their daily drives, without taking itself too seriously.
details
Mitsubishi Colt
Renault Captur
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
18200 - 25000 £
|
Price
21100 - 28400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
4.2 - 5.3 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.4 - 6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
96 - 119 g/km
|
co2
100 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
39 - 42 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1189 - 1380 kg
|
Curb weight
1323 - 1441 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
301 - 391 L
|
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
|
|
Length
4053 mm
|
Length
4239 mm
|
|
Width
1798 mm
|
Width
1797 mm
|
|
Height
1439 mm
|
Height
1575 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
979 - 1069 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1363 L
|
|
Payload
381 - 385 kg
|
Payload
447 - 453 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
91 - 143 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 158 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.3 - 12.2 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
174 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
148 - 160 Nm
|
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
67 - 105 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1598 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023 - 2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
|
Brand
Mitsubishi
|
Brand
Renault
|
Is the Mitsubishi Colt offered with different drivetrains?
The Mitsubishi Colt is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.