Two cars, one duel: Honda HR-V meets Renault Captur.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!
In the fiercely competitive world of compact SUVs, the Honda HR-V and Renault Captur stand out as top contenders. Both models showcase a blend of style, performance, and innovation that caters to varying preferences. Let's dive into the specifics of these two popular models to see how they measure up against each other.
Both the Honda HR-V and Renault Captur are quintessentially designed as modern urban SUVs. The HR-V is slightly longer at 4340 mm compared to Captur's 4239 mm. This gives it a more elongated look. The HR-V's height of 1582 mm adds a touch of vertical grace, while the Captur stands just slightly lower at 1575 mm but offers a more compact profile suited for city driving.
The HR-V features a 1.5L full hybrid engine, generating 130 HP (96 kW) and a torque of 253 Nm. In contrast, the Captur offers a range of engines, with a peak performance model delivering 158 HP (116 kW) and 270 Nm of torque from its versatile petrol MHEV engine. This variety underscores Captur's adaptability to different consumer needs, from efficiency-driven hybrids to more spirited petrol engines.
Efficiency-wise, both models offer commendable performance. The HR-V achieves a consumption rate of 5.4 L/100km and emits 122 g/km of CO2, perfectly balancing performance with environmental responsibility. The Captur, particularly in its full hybrid variant, boasts an impressive 4.7 L/100km with a CO2 output of just 106 g/km, placing it slightly ahead in eco-friendliness.
Where transmission is concerned, the HR-V employs a Continuous Variable Transmission (CVT), enhancing its smoothness in power delivery and handling within cityscapes. On the other hand, the Captur offers flexibility with automatic, manual, and dual-clutch options, catering to diverse driving preferences.
Both vehicles comfortably seat five passengers, ensuring ample comfort for family journeys. The HR-V offers a trunk capacity of 335 liters, expandable to 320 liters, while the Captur provides versatility with options offering up to 422 liters of space, making it slightly more practical for those with luggage-heavy lifestyles.
The Honda HR-V thrives on its advanced hybrid technology, emphasizing efficiency and a seamless transition between power sources for a dynamic drive. Renault's Captur, with its comprehensive engine range, offers versatility, and its 0.6 kWh battery in the hybrid variant distinguishes it as a tech-savvy alternative with notable fuel economy.
Choosing between the Honda HR-V and Renault Captur ultimately comes down to personal preference and priorities. The HR-V appeals to those who prioritize innovative hybrid systems in a robust package. In contrast, the Captur offers a wider engine range and slightly better cargo capacity, appealing to customers who value choice and versatility. Both models deliver impressive attributes, marking them as worthy leaders in the compact SUV segment.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Renault Captur has a decisively advantage in terms of price – it starts at 21100 £, while the Honda HR-V costs 29700 £. That’s a price difference of around 8614 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Renault Captur manages with 4.50 L and is therefore clearly perceptible more efficient than the Honda HR-V with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.90 L per 100 km.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Captur has a barely noticeable edge – offering 143 HP compared to 131 HP. That’s roughly 12 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Renault Captur is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 8.90 s, while the Honda HR-V takes 10.60 s. That’s about 1.70 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Renault Captur performs minimal better – reaching 180 km/h, while the Honda HR-V tops out at 170 km/h. The difference is around 10 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Renault Captur pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 265 Nm compared to 253 Nm. That’s about 12 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Renault Captur is hardly perceptible lighter – 1323 kg compared to 1452 kg. The difference is around 129 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Renault Captur offers evident more room – 422 L compared to 319 L. That’s a difference of about 103 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Renault Captur performs barely noticeable better – up to 1363 L, which is about 74 L more than the Honda HR-V.
When it comes to payload, Renault Captur barely noticeable takes the win – 453 kg compared to 418 kg. That’s a difference of about 35 kg.
Overall, the Renault Captur shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
@ Renault Group Media
The Honda HR-V is the sensible compact crossover that blends roomy practicality with a composed, friendly drive, making it an easy pick for buyers who want everyday usability without fuss. It won’t thrill hardcore enthusiasts, but its clever packaging, comfortable cabin and low-key styling make life simpler — and that’s exactly the point.
details
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
The Renault Captur is a cheeky little crossover that pairs city-friendly agility with a roomy, well-thought-out cabin and enough style to turn heads at the lights. It’s a sensible choice for buyers who want practical versatility and a dash of personality on their daily drives, without taking itself too seriously.
details
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
@ Renault Group Media
|
@ Honda Motor Co., Ltd.
|
@ Renault Group Media
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
29700 - 35400 £
|
Price
21100 - 28300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.40 L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.5 - 6 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
122 g/km
|
co2
102 - 137 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
40 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
48 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1452 kg
|
Curb weight
1323 - 1514 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
319 L
|
Trunk capacity
326 - 422 L
|
|
Length
4355 mm
|
Length
4239 mm
|
|
Width
-
|
Width
1797 mm
|
|
Height
1582 mm
|
Height
1575 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1289 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1276 - 1363 L
|
|
Payload
418 kg
|
Payload
376 - 453 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Full Hybrid, Petrol, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
CVT
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
131 HP
|
Power HP
115 - 143 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.6 - 10.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.9 - 12.3 s
|
|
Max Speed
170 km/h
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
|
Torque
253 Nm
|
Torque
160 - 265 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
|
Power kW
96 kW
|
Power kW
84 - 116 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1498 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1199 - 1789 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D, E
|
|
Brand
Honda
|
Brand
Renault
|
The Honda HR-V is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España