VS

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross vs Skoda Karoq – Which car suits you better?

Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross or Skoda Karoq fits your lifestyle better.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Eclipse Cross @ Mitsubishi Motos

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Skoda Karoq has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 29100 £, while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross costs 36000 £. That’s a price difference of around 6909 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross manages with 2 L and is therefore clearly more efficient than the Skoda Karoq with 4.90 L. The difference is about 2.90 L per 100 km.

Karoq @ skoda-media.de

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Karoq has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 190 HP compared to 188 HP. That’s roughly 2 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Karoq is decisively quicker – completing the sprint in 7 s, while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross takes 10.90 s. That’s about 3.90 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Karoq performs evident better – reaching 221 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross tops out at 162 km/h. The difference is around 59 km/h.

Eclipse Cross @ Mitsubishi Motos

Space and Everyday Use:

Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Skoda Karoq is convincingly lighter – 1380 kg compared to 1985 kg. The difference is around 605 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Karoq offers evident more room – 521 L compared to 359 L. That’s a difference of about 162 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Karoq performs noticeable better – up to 1630 L, which is about 522 L more than the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Karoq a bit takes the win – 549 kg compared to 440 kg. That’s a difference of about 109 kg.

Who wins the race?

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross proves to be wins the duel decisively and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross is the better all-rounder in this comparison.

from about £36,000
mmd_22_ecpih_ext_komp_3_4_front_titan_weiss_dscf0844_low

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

  • Engine Type : Plugin Hybrid
  • Drive Type : All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 188 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 2 L
  • Electric Range : 45 km
details

Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross

The Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross presents a sleek fusion of dynamic design and versatile functionality, perfect for urban adventures and weekend getaways alike. Its elegant lines and bold front grille make a strong statement on the road, while its well-appointed interior offers a comfortable and connected driving experience. With advanced safety features and intuitive technology, the Eclipse Cross ensures drivers feel secure and in control, whether navigating city streets or scenic routes.

details
mmd_22_ecpih_ext_komp_3_4_front_titan_weiss_dscf0844_low @ Mitsubishi Motos
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Plug in Hybrid 42_low @ Mitsubishi Motos
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross Plug in Hybrid 30_low @ Mitsubishi Motos

Skoda Karoq

5 (1)
rate

The Skoda Karoq is a versatile compact SUV that combines practicality with a stylish design. Its interior is spacious and well-appointed, offering a comfortable ride for both driver and passengers. With advanced technology features, it ensures a connected and safe driving experience.

details
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113497 @ skoda-media.de
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113477 @ skoda-media.de
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113491 @ skoda-media.de
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113481 @ skoda-media.de
KAROQ_ueberarbeitet_2022_#_#_#_#_113494 @ skoda-media.de

Similar Comparisons

Hyundai Tucson
Skoda Karoq
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Hyundai Tucson and Skoda Karoq emerge as strong contenders, each offering a blend of practicality and style. The Tucson impresses with its bold design and advanced technology features, while the Karoq stands out for its spacious interior and excellent driving dynamics. Ultimately, the choice between these two well-rounded vehicles boils down to personal preference and priorities, whether it's tech-savvy comfort or agility on the road.
Mazda CX-5
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Mazda CX-5 courts you with a near-luxury cabin and engaging handling that turns everyday drives into something livelier, while the Skoda Karoq sticks to a sensible script — clever storage, roomy rear seats and sharp value for families. Choose the CX-5 if you want style, poise and a more premium feel; pick the Karoq if practicality, lower running costs and smarter packaging win your heart.
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
Skoda Karoq
Eclipse Cross
Karoq

Costs and Consumption
Price
36000 - 42000 £
Price
29100 - 41700 £
Consumption L/100km
2 L
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
45 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
46 g/km
co2
128 - 173 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
43 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1985 - 2052 kg
Curb weight
1380 - 1655 kg
Trunk capacity
359 L
Trunk capacity
521 L
Length
4545 mm
Length
4384 - 4390 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1841 mm
Height
1685 mm
Height
1624 - 1629 mm
Max trunk capacity
1108 L
Max trunk capacity
1630 L
Payload
373 - 440 kg
Payload
456 - 549 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Transmission
-
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
-
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
188 HP
Power HP
115 - 190 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
10.90 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 11.2 s
Max Speed
162 km/h
Max Speed
192 - 221 km/h
Torque
-
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
138 kW
Power kW
85 - 140 kW
Engine capacity
2360 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1984 cm3

General
Model Year
2021 - 2022
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Skoda

Similar Comparisons

Dacia Duster
Skoda Karoq
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Dacia Duster and Skoda Karoq emerge as strong contenders, each catering to distinct buyer preferences. The Duster offers an impressive value proposition with its rugged design and practical features, making it an ideal choice for budget-conscious adventurers. Meanwhile, the Karoq impresses with its refined interior, advanced technology, and dynamic handling, appealing to those seeking a more premium driving experience.
Skoda Karoq
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Skoda Karoq and VW T-Roc present two compelling options for buyers seeking style and practicality. While the Karoq boasts a more spacious interior and generous cargo capacity, the T-Roc stands out with its sporty design and engaging driving dynamics. Ultimately, the choice between these two models will depend on individual preferences for versatility versus flair.
Kia Sportage
Skoda Karoq
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Kia Sportage and Skoda Karoq stand out with their impressive blend of style and functionality. While the Sportage boasts a bold design with advanced tech features, the Karoq emphasizes practicality and spaciousness, making it a top choice for families. Ultimately, both vehicles offer excellent performance and comfort, but each caters to different preferences in design and utility.
Skoda Karoq
Volvo XC40
VS
The Skoda Karoq and the Volvo XC40 go head-to-head in the compact SUV segment, each bringing unique advantages to potential buyers. The Karoq impresses with its practicality, offering generous cargo space and efficient engine options, making it an ideal choice for families and long journeys. In contrast, the Volvo XC40 stands out with its chic Scandinavian design and advanced safety features, appealing to buyers with a penchant for style and cutting-edge technology.
Nissan Qashqai
Skoda Karoq
VS
The Nissan Qashqai stands out with its sleek design and efficiency, making it an ideal choice for urban adventures, while the Skoda Karoq offers remarkable practicality and interior space, appealing to families and long-distance travelers. Both crossovers come equipped with a suite of advanced technology and safety features, though the Skoda often steals the spotlight with its user-friendly infotainment system. Ultimately, the decision between the two may rest on personal preference, whether one prioritizes style and fuel economy or space and comfort.
Skoda Karoq
Toyota RAV4
VS
Ford Kuga
Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross
VS
In the highly competitive compact SUV segment, the Ford Kuga stands out with its impressive blend of performance and practicality, making it a top choice for families and adventure seekers alike. Meanwhile, the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross offers a distinctive design and a comfortable ride, catering to those who prioritize style and technology. Ultimately, the decision between these two versatile models will come down to personal preferences in space, features, and driving experience.
Ford Kuga
Skoda Karoq
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Ford Kuga shines with its dynamic driving experience and advanced technological features, making it a favorite among enthusiasts. In contrast, the Skoda Karoq impresses with its practicality and spacious interior, offering exceptional comfort for families. While the Kuga leans towards a sportier appeal, the Karoq excels in functionality, catering to different customer preferences in this highly sought-after market.
What drive types are available for the Mitsubishi Eclipse Cross?

Available configurations include All-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.