VS

Mitsubishi Space Star vs Skoda Fabia comparison

Compare performance (71 HP vs 177 HP), boot space and price (11600 £ vs 16900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mitsubishi Space Star or Skoda Fabia?

Space Star

Mitsubishi Space Star vs Skoda Fabia: A Comprehensive Comparison

Choosing a new car is a daunting task, especially when faced with the options like the Mitsubishi Space Star and the Skoda Fabia. Both models hail from reliable brands and serve as popular choices in the compact hatchback segment. However, they cater to distinct preferences, needs, and budgets. In this comparison, we delve into the technical specifications and innovations of these models, focusing on their strengths and what sets them apart.

Fabia

Performance and Power

The Mitsubishi Space Star is powered by a 1.2-liter, 3-cylinder petrol engine delivering 71 horsepower and 102 Nm of torque. Its front-wheel drive and modest output make it a practical option for urban commutes and daily drives. The Space Star offers both manual and automatic (CVT) transmissions, allowing drivers to choose based on their preference. Its acceleration from 0-100 km/h takes between 14.1 and 15.8 seconds, with a top speed peaking at 167 km/h.

In contrast, the Skoda Fabia offers a broader range of engine choices. Starting with a 1.0-liter 3-cylinder to a more potent 1.5-liter 4-cylinder, producing anywhere from 80 to 150 horsepower. The Fabia also provides both manual and dual-clutch automatic transmissions. Notably, its fastest variant accelerates from 0-100 km/h in a brisk 8 seconds, reaching speeds up to 225 km/h. This makes the Fabia an appealing choice for those who crave performance alongside practicality.

Space Star

Fuel Efficiency and Emissions

Fuel consumption is a critical factor for many buyers. The Mitsubishi Space Star boasts a consumption range of 4.9 to 5.5 L/100km, making it a fuel-efficient option for daily driving. Carbon emissions range between 112 and 125 g/km, placing it in efficiency classes C and D.

On the other hand, the Skoda Fabia encounters slightly higher consumption figures, ranging from 5 to 5.5 L/100km. Its CO2 emissions span from 112 to 124 g/km with efficiency classes also scored at C and D. While both vehicles deliver competitive efficiency, the choice might depend on the desired power output.

Fabia

Design and Dimensions

The Mitsubishi Space Star displays compact dimensions, with a length of 3845 mm, width of 1665 mm, and a height of 1505 mm. This compactness is advantageous for urban maneuverability and parking. Its trunk capacity ranges between 209 and 235 liters, providing adequate space for everyday needs.

In contrast, the Skoda Fabia is more expansive with a length of 4108 mm and a width of 1780 mm. The height varies slightly between variants, offering a practical yet modern aesthetic. The Fabia's larger size accommodates a more generous trunk space of 380 liters, appealing to families and those needing additional storage.

Space Star

Innovations and Features

While the Mitsubishi Space Star prioritizes simplicity and affordability, it doesn't shy away from offering a comfortable ride with essential features. Its lightweight design contributes to its efficiency and eases handling, making it an attractive option for budget-conscious buyers.

The Skoda Fabia steps up with advanced technology and sophisticated features, including modern infotainment systems and driver-assist technologies. It appeals to those who seek a bit more luxury and convenience in their hatchback choice. Overall, the Fabia represents a balanced blend of performance, practicality, and dynamic design.

Fabia

Conclusion

Both the Mitsubishi Space Star and the Skoda Fabia excel in their respective areas, offering distinct advantages to different types of drivers. The Space Star is ideal for those who value efficiency and simplicity, while the Fabia attracts those looking for performance, space, and cutting-edge technology. Ultimately, the choice between these two comes down to personal preference and priorities on the road.

Mitsubishi Space Star vs Skoda Fabia: Key differences

Mitsubishi Space Star

  • clearly cheaper
  • distinct lighter

Skoda Fabia

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • decisively more power
  • clearly quicker from 0–100 km/h
  • distinct more trunk space

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Space Star

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Mitsubishi Space Star has a clearly advantage in terms of price – it starts at 11600 £ , while the Skoda Fabia costs 16900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 5229 £.

Both cars consume an average of 4.90 L per 100 km – no difference here.

Fabia

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Skoda Fabia has a decisively edge – offering 177 HP compared to 71 HP. That’s roughly 106 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Skoda Fabia is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the Mitsubishi Space Star takes 14.10 s. That’s about 6.70 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Skoda Fabia performs noticeable better – reaching 228 km/h, while the Mitsubishi Space Star tops out at 167 km/h. The difference is around 61 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: Skoda Fabia pulls clearly stronger with 250 Nm compared to 102 Nm. That’s about 148 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Mitsubishi Space Star is distinct lighter – 940 kg compared to 1143 kg. The difference is around 203 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Skoda Fabia offers distinct more room – 380 L compared to 235 L. That’s a difference of about 145 L.

In maximum load capacity, the Skoda Fabia performs evident better – up to 1190 L, which is about 278 L more than the Mitsubishi Space Star.

When it comes to payload, Skoda Fabia hardly perceptible takes the win – 437 kg compared to 400 kg. That’s a difference of about 37 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Skoda Fabia is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

Frequently compared as well

Skoda Fabia
Skoda Kamiq
VS
If you want a brilliant little hatch that’s cheap to run, slips into tight parking and keeps boot space sensible, the Skoda Fabia is the clever everyday choice; the Skoda Kamiq, by contrast, dresses the same sensible Skoda DNA in a taller, more family-friendly crossover body with extra ride height …
Skoda Fabia
Skoda Scala
VS
Think of the Skoda Fabia as the scrappy city wizard: compact, cheap to run and brilliantly easy to park, while the Skoda Scala feels like an adult hatchback with more space, sharper tech and a calmer, more composed ride. If you want thrift and cheeky agility, go Fabia; if you need room, refinement …
Mitsubishi Space Star
Skoda Fabia

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
from about £16,900
Fabia

Skoda Fabia

  • Engine Type : Petrol
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 80 - 177 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 5.6 L
details

Mitsubishi Space Star

The Mitsubishi Space Star is a tidy, no-nonsense city car that squeezes surprising interior space into a compact, easy-to-park package. It's not a thrill-seeker's toy, but for buyers after low running costs, fuss-free reliability and sensible day-to-day practicality, it's a clever and cheerful choice that keeps your wallet and nerves happy.

details
DSC_2683_low
DSC_6272_low
DSC_8755_low
050_low

Skoda Fabia

5 (1 Reviews)
rate

The Skoda Fabia is a clever, no-nonsense small car that turns everyday chores into a breeze thanks to smart packaging and a surprisingly roomy cabin. It won’t set your pulses racing, but it’s a consistently sensible choice — reliable, easy to live with and blessed with a few neat tricks that make city life less faff.

details
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116050
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116049
Der neue SKODA FABIA Dynamisch_116061
Der neue SKODA FABIA Detail_116013
Der neue SKODA FABIA Interieur_115896

Reviews Mitsubishi Space Star

Reviews Skoda Fabia

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
Mitsubishi Space Star
Skoda Fabia

Costs and Consumption
Price
11600 - 18700 £
Price
16900 - 30500 £
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.5 L
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 5.6 L
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
112 - 125 g/km
co2
112 - 126 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
35 L
Fuel tank capacity
40 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
Hatchback
Body Type
Hatchback
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
940 - 1011 kg
Curb weight
1143 - 1278 kg
Trunk capacity
209 - 235 L
Trunk capacity
380 L
Length
3845 mm
Length
4108 - 4137 mm
Width
1665 mm
Width
1780 mm
Height
1505 mm
Height
1458 - 1461 mm
Max trunk capacity
881 - 912 L
Max trunk capacity
1190 L
Payload
359 - 400 kg
Payload
402 - 437 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, CVT
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
71 HP
Power HP
80 - 177 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
14.1 - 15.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 15.7 s
Max Speed
163 - 167 km/h
Max Speed
175 - 228 km/h
Torque
102 Nm
Torque
93 - 250 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
52 kW
Power kW
59 - 130 kW
Engine capacity
1193 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1498 cm3

General
Model Year
2020 - 2022
Model Year
2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
C, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, C
Brand
Mitsubishi
Brand
Skoda

Similar Comparisons

Hyundai i20
Skoda Fabia
VS
The Hyundai i20 is the sassy, tech-packed choice — peppy engines, crisp looks and a surprisingly upscale cabin for the money — while the Škoda Fabia plays the practical trump card with cavernous boot space, calm manners and a build-for-the-long-haul sensibility. If you want style and gadgetry that …
SEAT Ibiza
Skoda Fabia
VS
The SEAT Ibiza brings snap, youthful styling and engaging handling that makes town driving feel like a mini hot hatch, while the Škoda Fabia answers with roomy practicality, clever storage and a smoother, more accomplished everyday ride. Pick the Ibiza if you want flair and fun; choose the Fabia if …
SEAT Arona
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the SEAT Arona stands out with its sportier design and engaging driving dynamics, appealing to buyers looking for a fun-to-drive option. On the other hand, the Skoda Fabia offers a more practical approach, boasting a spacious interior and impressive boot …
Skoda Fabia
Toyota Yaris
VS
In a head-to-head comparison, the Skoda Fabia and Toyota Yaris both demonstrate distinct strengths in the subcompact car segment. The Fabia impresses with its spacious interior and practical design, offering excellent value for budget-conscious drivers. Meanwhile, the Yaris stands out with its …
Renault Clio
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the ongoing battle of compact hatchbacks, the Renault Clio and Skoda Fabia have both staked their claim for supremacy. The Clio boasts a stylish design and a reputation for comfort, often appealing to those who prioritize aesthetics and innovative tech in their daily drive. Meanwhile, the Fabia …
Skoda Fabia
Suzuki Swift
VS
In the competitive segment of compact cars, the Skoda Fabia and Suzuki Swift stand out with their unique blend of style and practicality. The Fabia offers a spacious interior and advanced technology, making it a favorite for those seeking comfort on long drives, while the Swift impresses with its …
Hyundai i10
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the compact car segment, the Hyundai i10 presents a vibrant package with its fuel efficiency and agile handling, making city drives effortlessly enjoyable. Meanwhile, the Skoda Fabia stands out with a more spacious interior and a sophisticated design, offering a slightly more premium feel. For …
Kia Stonic
Skoda Fabia
VS
In the competitive subcompact segment, the Kia Stonic and Skoda Fabia both offer distinctive styles and features tailored to urban driving. The Stonic impresses with its bold design and extensive customization options, while the Fabia stands out with its spacious interior and practical tech …
What drivetrain options does the Mitsubishi Space Star have?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices shown are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted for local VAT. Local registration taxes (e.g. NoVA, BPM or CO2 malus) are not included. This information is not legally binding.